200+ whp n/a without nitrous
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 03-07-05
Location: San Pedro/PV
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
200+ whp n/a without nitrous
- cams $650
- intake $200
- header $400
- exhaust $500
- vector tune $400
Total: Roughly $2200 for 50whp? Or $44/hp
Think it's possible?
- intake $200
- header $400
- exhaust $500
- vector tune $400
Total: Roughly $2200 for 50whp? Or $44/hp
Think it's possible?
#8
if you want 50whp outta cams and supporting mods the cams are gonna have to be big enough to need valvetrain upgrades so add about $300 more to the list for valvetrain components. then if you want more power you can p&p the head and get much better numbers from the cams and if the port job is nice youll have a smoother power curve too.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-30-06
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 5,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Eddie
dont forget fuel system, stock fuel system wont handle a 50whp increase thats like 80 hp that the engine is gaining.
#11
this is one of those topics that will inevitably cause an argument, whether or not its possible...watch, once certain "experts" post that it isnt possible, you'll have half of the people in this thread changing their minds.
just post the results, i want to see someone post the finished product instead of talking about it. i 100% agree that it is possible.
just post the results, i want to see someone post the finished product instead of talking about it. i 100% agree that it is possible.
#12
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 04-13-04
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah i'm planning on using ss/sc injectors. From what i've gathered all ecotecs use the same type just different lbs/hr. And with tuning i'm sure the injectors would work fine with the ecu.
#14
Originally Posted by CobaltKids
Hmm I think $2,200 is a lot of money for 50whp. But im 17 and dont have a lot of moohlah so thats probably why. If you do it let us know how it goes!
#15
I'm not sure if the computer was programed to handle the larger injectors is what I meant. The SS S/C is only programmed to handle the stock 34 lb-hr and the the Stage 42.5 lb-hr. Intense and others make the 60 lb-hr injectors work by changing the VE table to trick the computer. It works, but it's not the most accurate way of tuning.
Just be sure to do a few stock pulls for a baseline figure and then a few after the mods to see the differance.
Just be sure to do a few stock pulls for a baseline figure and then a few after the mods to see the differance.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-26-05
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pjk91
- cams $650
- intake $200
- header $400
- exhaust $500
- vector tune $400
Total: Roughly $2200 for 50whp? Or $44/hp
Think it's possible?
- intake $200
- header $400
- exhaust $500
- vector tune $400
Total: Roughly $2200 for 50whp? Or $44/hp
Think it's possible?
#18
Senior Member
Originally Posted by SpecialK
Don't forget using a thinner headgasket. (If you can even get one for the 2.4) THat slight bumping up in compression will help bigtime. :thumbsup
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-30-06
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 5,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would think tuning, higher compression pistons (somewhere between 11.0 and 11.5 maybe?), and a bumped redline will get you at or near TSX levels, and from there you can still do bolt-ons and cams. I don't see why it wouldn't be possible, but I think you may go over budget if you're set on $2,200.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-28-06
Location: Greensburg (PA)
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tomtwtwtw
I would think tuning, higher compression pistons (somewhere between 11.0 and 11.5 maybe?), and a bumped redline will get you at or near TSX levels, and from there you can still do bolt-ons and cams. I don't see why it wouldn't be possible, but I think you may go over budget if you're set on $2,200.
I think with JBP cams, the 3" inch DP/header combo, 3 inch exhaust, intake and tuning
2.4s will be running much faster than TSXs (unless they have a ton of $$$ into them or are FI) .. I ran a A spec TSX with at least an intake and exhaust and he faded pretty quickly even with my limited mods. I think they are a bit heavier than 2.4s. But none the less, good competition for us.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-30-06
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 5,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GTP
I think with JBP cams, the 3" inch DP/header combo, 3 inch exhaust, intake and tuning
2.4s will be running much faster than TSXs (unless they have a ton of $$$ into them or are FI) .. I ran a A spec TSX with at least an intake and exhaust and he faded pretty quickly even with my limited mods. I think they are a bit heavier than 2.4s. But none the less, good competition for us.
2.4s will be running much faster than TSXs (unless they have a ton of $$$ into them or are FI) .. I ran a A spec TSX with at least an intake and exhaust and he faded pretty quickly even with my limited mods. I think they are a bit heavier than 2.4s. But none the less, good competition for us.
#25
I don't think you'd need cams to hit the numbers you want. An intake, header, high flow cat and cat back exhaust should get you right around halfway there then do some port work and the tune and you'd probly see somewhere in the 40 HP gain range.