Bnr k04-gt28
#576
Senior Member
So frankly we both don't know wtf we are talking about ...
#577
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-08-06
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Making 360 efficiently? For how long? With a good powerband and without E-85? Also, you should know term that the sky's will always show lower HP results due to the higher drivetrain lost( in the case of the stock turbo). I'll be impressed when you do 360 at a dyno on stock turbo without E-85 and on pump. I can imagine if you think your squeezing that much power from a stock turbo, the numbers you'll be pulling from this upgrade will be AMAZING. Your such a Floridian, I can tell! Flamboyant cocky about ONE time case with so many variables, but still cling to that one car. How many 360hp SS/TC are out there? FF ace and who else? I know of 350whp on pump 91 here in Cali.
All in all, thanks though for being one of the many tuners in this community.
O-town peeps, gotta Love them.
All in all, thanks though for being one of the many tuners in this community.
O-town peeps, gotta Love them.
#578
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-13-09
Location: Davie, Fl
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
first off dude you need to get your info right. term has tuned a couple other cobalts that are pushing around the same numbers as me drewbroo is one of them also BYT has 09whiteSS something that has just a lil higher numbers than i do. My tune ive had on my car for awhile now and i havnt had any problems what so ever other than the stock clutch slipping. whos pushing 350whp on cali pump 91? im calling BS or a very happy dyno because i know that cat **** for gas you have out there wont cut it we have the same in az that was the big reason why im running a e85 mix as well as methanol injection. so you need to cool your jets.
#579
Senior Member
first off dude you need to get your info right. term has tuned a couple other cobalts that are pushing around the same numbers as me drewbroo is one of them also BYT has 09whiteSS something that has just a lil higher numbers than i do. My tune ive had on my car for awhile now and i havnt had any problems what so ever other than the stock clutch slipping. whos pushing 350whp on cali pump 91? im calling BS or a very happy dyno because i know that cat **** for gas you have out there wont cut it we have the same in az that was the big reason why im running a e85 mix as well as methanol injection. so you need to cool your jets.
Look, Whatever you guys do is great and overall if your happy with what you have then awesome. Im just the kinda guy that like everything on a car to be unique and dont exploit/preach that only certain tunes are best. I guess in your situation where its more economical for you, you did that mix and got some nice numbers. Now did anyone want to answer the questions that I asked Term? Lets take your car then, how long does your car make that power for? Does it do it efficiently with the stock turbo? is that at Redline? I'm not trying to push this on cause really what does it matter, I'm just asking what i asked Term is all.
Now, once you guys get this new stage 1 or 2 then we'll really see some numbers and efficiency ranges on the turbo that will be more in line with what I like.
yep,
Last edited by 40rty; 01-14-2011 at 09:36 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#581
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: 03-01-09
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Update on the car...
Went out and drove it around a little. Everything is installed. Tuning will happen shortly. Beware that you will have to do something about the charge pipes because the stock turbo has a 3" tip on it for where the hot side charge piping connects that the Stage II does not. This means your CP will be about 3" short. I'll upload a pic later to show...
Went out and drove it around a little. Everything is installed. Tuning will happen shortly. Beware that you will have to do something about the charge pipes because the stock turbo has a 3" tip on it for where the hot side charge piping connects that the Stage II does not. This means your CP will be about 3" short. I'll upload a pic later to show...
#582
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-08-06
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Look, Whatever you guys do is great and overall if your happy with what you have then awesome. Im just the kinda guy that like everything on a car to be unique and dont exploit/preach that only certain tunes are best. I guess in your situation where its more economical for you, you did that mix and got some nice numbers. Now did anyone want to answer the questions that I asked Term? Lets take your car then, how long does your car make that power for? Does it do it efficiently with the stock turbo? is that at Redline? I'm not trying to push this on cause really what does it matter, I'm just asking what i asked Term is all.
Now, once you guys get this new stage 1 or 2 then we'll really see some numbers and efficiency ranges on the turbo that will be more in line with what I like.
yep,
Now, once you guys get this new stage 1 or 2 then we'll really see some numbers and efficiency ranges on the turbo that will be more in line with what I like.
yep,
#583
Senior Member
Update on the car...
Went out and drove it around a little. Everything is installed. Tuning will happen shortly. Beware that you will have to do something about the charge pipes because the stock turbo has a 3" tip on it for where the hot side charge piping connects that the Stage II does not. This means your CP will be about 3" short. I'll upload a pic later to show...
Went out and drove it around a little. Everything is installed. Tuning will happen shortly. Beware that you will have to do something about the charge pipes because the stock turbo has a 3" tip on it for where the hot side charge piping connects that the Stage II does not. This means your CP will be about 3" short. I'll upload a pic later to show...
#587
Senior Member
Making 360 efficiently? For how long? With a good powerband and without E-85? Also, you should know term that the sky's will always show lower HP results due to the higher drivetrain lost( in the case of the stock turbo). I'll be impressed when you do 360 at a dyno on stock turbo without E-85 and on pump. I can imagine if you think your squeezing that much power from a stock turbo, the numbers you'll be pulling from this upgrade will be AMAZING. Your such a Floridian, I can tell! Flamboyant cocky about ONE time case with so many variables, but still cling to that one car. How many 360hp SS/TC are out there? FF ace and who else? I know of 350whp on pump 91 here in Cali.
All in all, thanks though for being one of the many tuners in this community.
O-town peeps, gotta Love them.
All in all, thanks though for being one of the many tuners in this community.
O-town peeps, gotta Love them.
#590
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
My car made 342 whp 378 wrtq on a dynojet and 362 whp 393 wtrq on a dynocom no E-85 no meth and 24 psi. It holds power pretty well until 6500 RPMs. FF-aces car made more than mine but he has E-85/91 octane and a small meth nozzle. RYRIDESMOTOX's car I tuned is close to 350 whp on 91 octane out in Cali (310 whp 370 wtrq on a mustang dyno)
the only number that actually sounds normal is the mustang dyno numbers
the fact that the dynocom read 20 whp higher and 17 wtrq higher then the DYNOJET should make you throw it out right away
just busting chops btw i know you're a good tuner but inflated numbers are just that.. for all you know the kappa could be putting down 400 whp on your dynojet or whatever
Last edited by elecblue06; 01-15-2011 at 10:43 AM.
#591
Senior Member
All relative. Dynojets read ~13% higher than a properly calibrated mustang dyno but most dynojets read within 1% of each other because there is no operator error like mustang dynos and dynocoms. My car did make only 242 whp stock on that dynocom. Never got a chance to dyno stock on the dynojet but it would have likely made 228-230 whp stock. IMHO the best way to try to compare numbers is for everyone to use dynojet numbers and the same correction factor, using STD, SAE, or Uncorrected does not matter if everyone is using the same one.
#592
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
All relative. Dynojets read ~13% higher than a properly calibrated mustang dyno but most dynojets read within 1% of each other because there is no operator error like mustang dynos and dynocoms. My car did make only 242 whp stock on that dynocom. Never got a chance to dyno stock on the dynojet but it would have likely made 228-230 whp stock. IMHO the best way to try to compare numbers is for everyone to use dynojet numbers and the same correction factor, using STD, SAE, or Uncorrected does not matter if everyone is using the same one.
242 stock makes sense however. like you said operator error could've made your second dyno higher
thats one thing that sucks.. when there is operator error
#594
Former Vendor
Dynojet numbers can be affected just as easily as Mustang numbers. Calibrations and weather station parameters can be way off. A michigan Grand Prix club dyno'd at Baker Engineering on their Dynojet and several people had numbers 5 to 7% lower than they had recently tested on VT Engines Dynojet. More importantly, though is that stating a peak dyno number really only means that the car put that amount of power to the roller at one instance in time, for a fraction of a second in some cases. I recently saw someone post that they dyno'd xx amount of power, but the clutch was slipping so it should be higher. Well this is not necessarily true. In fact, a slipping clutch often makes the peak HP number higher. Much the same way that spinning your tires can give you a higher mph in your 1/4 mile run, a slipping clutch allows your motor to reach a higher RPM and stay there while the drivetrain catches up. While power numbers early in the graph will be lower, the peak power is often higher. This is due to the stored energy of the motor because it is already spinning at a high RPM. There are many other ways that dyno numbers can be inflated as well without technically being "inaccurate." That type of stuff rarely gets disscussed, however.
#599
Senior Member
My car made 342 whp 378 wrtq on a dynojet and 362 whp 393 wtrq on a dynocom no E-85 no meth and 24 psi. It holds power pretty well until 6500 RPMs. FF-aces car made more than mine but he has E-85/91 octane and a small meth nozzle. RYRIDESMOTOX's car I tuned is close to 350 whp on 91 octane out in Cali (310 whp 370 wtrq on a mustang dyno)
Sup,
RYRIDEMOTOX's car is who I was talking about making 350 on pump. See I didn't know that you tuned his using pump. That's what I like to see and I know him personally. Just not a fan of the whole E85/91 and Meth, that doesn't even sound cost effective.