08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion Discuss the 2008 - 2009 Chevy Cobalt SS Turbocharged. On sale since the second quarter of 2008.

Bnr k04-gt28

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2011, 08:02 PM
  #1651  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
cubaniche's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-26-09
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,804
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Sweetsandman
^^^ did you remove your head to install those? If not...how difficult was it? Do you need special tools or anything or can the basic handy-man do it lol?
It is def easier with the head off since you dont have to worry about dropping a valve into a cylinder. I dont know if a basic handyman can do it. It is pretty involved taking the cams out and having to redo the timing once your all done. And to do that, you have to remove the timing chain cover, which in turn means you have to remove the engine mount, and so on and so forth lol
There are quite a few things you have to do and its def a two man job. If you havent done it before I wouldnt recommend trying it yourself. Luckily, one of my best friends is a genius when it comes to all this and he was on hand helping me out and telling me what to do lol
I must admit, it was pretty cool doing it though
Old 05-08-2011, 08:44 PM
  #1652  
Senior Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Sweetsandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-15-09
Location: Parma, OH
Posts: 4,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cubaniche
It is def easier with the head off since you dont have to worry about dropping a valve into a cylinder. I dont know if a basic handyman can do it. It is pretty involved taking the cams out and having to redo the timing once your all done. And to do that, you have to remove the timing chain cover, which in turn means you have to remove the engine mount, and so on and so forth lol
There are quite a few things you have to do and its def a two man job. If you havent done it before I wouldnt recommend trying it yourself. Luckily, one of my best friends is a genius when it comes to all this and he was on hand helping me out and telling me what to do lol
I must admit, it was pretty cool doing it though
Hmm...well...luckily ZZP is only like 4 and a half hours away
Old 05-08-2011, 09:29 PM
  #1653  
Former Vendor
 
Matt M's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-03-08
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by HHRSSouth
I would definetly have my valve cover powdercoated while it was off.
You need to be careful with that. Most of the time when an Ecotec valve cover gets baked after powder-coating, the plastic baffles in the pcv passages melt and then it doesn't vent good anymore.
Old 05-08-2011, 09:32 PM
  #1654  
Senior Member
 
HHRSSouth's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-04-09
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Matt M
You need to be careful with that. Most of the time when an Ecotec valve cover gets baked after powder-coating, the plastic baffles in the pcv passages melt and then it doesn't vent good anymore.
Good info there, I didn't know that.
Old 05-08-2011, 09:39 PM
  #1655  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by elecblue06
sooo basically about 50 whp more then a stock turbo with similar mods?
Seeing as a normally 380-385 whp LS3 put down 347 whp (10% less then a dynojet) on that dyno a fully bolted and tuned stock turbo lnf on an E-blend would likely put down ~320 whp (10%less than a dynojet). So all and all I would say the BNR 2871 is worth about 70-75 whp over the stock turbo. I would say if he dynoed his car as it sits right now on a dynojet it would have made 10% more power which is 430 whp and 470 wrtq.
Old 05-08-2011, 10:52 PM
  #1656  
Premium Member
iTrader: (2)
 
drewbroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-08
Location: TUCSON AZ
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are correct sir. And the sheet I got is my low numbers. I will get the other sheet next week with my 398whp run

Originally Posted by Terminator2
Seeing as a normally 380-385 whp LS3 put down 347 whp (10% less then a dynojet) on that dyno a fully bolted and tuned stock turbo lnf on an E-blend would likely put down ~320 whp (10%less than a dynojet). So all and all I would say the BNR 2871 is worth about 70-75 whp over the stock turbo. I would say if he dynoed his car as it sits right now on a dynojet it would have made 10% more power which is 430 whp and 470 wrtq.
Old 05-08-2011, 11:03 PM
  #1657  
Former Vendor
 
Matt M's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-03-08
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Terminator2
Seeing as a normally 380-385 whp LS3 put down 347 whp (10% less then a dynojet) on that dyno a fully bolted and tuned stock turbo lnf on an E-blend would likely put down ~320 whp (10%less than a dynojet). So all and all I would say the BNR 2871 is worth about 70-75 whp over the stock turbo. I would say if he dynoed his car as it sits right now on a dynojet it would have made 10% more power which is 430 whp and 470 wrtq.
But then again we did 360 sae(373 std) on a Mustang dyno with the k04 on E85 when I was still running stock cams. We would need more test samples.

Last edited by Matt M; 05-08-2011 at 11:10 PM.
Old 05-08-2011, 11:18 PM
  #1658  
Premium Member
iTrader: (2)
 
drewbroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-08
Location: TUCSON AZ
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My numbers are sae. I also have elevation working against me. Also an srt4 w/ a gt3076 on full e only put down 435 whp there. He has done over 500 whp on a dynojet in phoenix. Also an nsx put down 218whp on it. It was a stingy Dyno, I'm good with it. If I make good numbers on that Dyno, I will do well on any Dyno.

Originally Posted by Matt M
But then again we did 360 sae(373 std) on a Mustang dyno with the k04 on E85 when I was still running stock cams. We would need more test samples.
Old 05-08-2011, 11:21 PM
  #1659  
Premium Member
iTrader: (2)
 
drewbroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-08
Location: TUCSON AZ
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Matt M
But then again we did 360 sae(373 std) on a Mustang dyno with the k04 on E85 when I was still running stock cams. We would need more test samples.
And was this on your dual feed rail? Your shop cars have much more available than the average joe.
Old 05-08-2011, 11:33 PM
  #1660  
Former Vendor
 
Matt M's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-03-08
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by drewbroo
And was this on your dual feed rail? Your shop cars have much more available than the average joe.
No, it was stock fuel system, stock head, stock cams, ZZP silicone intake tube, charge tubes, IC and exhaust, and E85 from the gas station up the street. Nothing fancy.
Old 05-08-2011, 11:36 PM
  #1661  
Former Vendor
 
Matt M's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-03-08
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by drewbroo
My numbers are sae. I also have elevation working against me. Also an srt4 w/ a gt3076 on full e only put down 435 whp there. He has done over 500 whp on a dynojet in phoenix. Also an nsx put down 218whp on it. It was a stingy Dyno, I'm good with it. If I make good numbers on that Dyno, I will do well on any Dyno.
But the posted numbers are corrected, so elevation isn't really working against you.
Old 05-08-2011, 11:38 PM
  #1662  
Former Vendor
 
Matt M's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-03-08
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
I'm not knocking your numbers. They show solid, respectable gains. I'm only responding to someone saying that they are 70-75whp over k04 numbers, which they are not.
Old 05-08-2011, 11:51 PM
  #1663  
Premium Member
iTrader: (2)
 
drewbroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-08
Location: TUCSON AZ
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Matt M
No, it was stock fuel system, stock head, stock cams, ZZP silicone intake tube, charge tubes, IC and exhaust, and E85 from the gas station up the street. Nothing fancy.
We need to get in on the secret to running full E85 then.
Old 05-08-2011, 11:56 PM
  #1664  
Former Vendor
 
Matt M's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-03-08
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by drewbroo
We need to get in on the secret to running full E85 then.
There wasn't any secret. It was september/october. It was 75% ethanol at the most. The stock fuel system easily supported it at anything over 4500 RPM.
Old 05-08-2011, 11:57 PM
  #1665  
Premium Member
iTrader: (2)
 
drewbroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-08
Location: TUCSON AZ
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Matt M
I'm not knocking your numbers. They show solid, respectable gains. I'm only responding to someone saying that they are 70-75whp over k04 numbers, which they are not.
its a decent increase in WHP, only comparison I have is the 334WHP run on a dyno jet in FL. Also an E47 fully modded cobalt with basically the same mods as me put down about 50WHP less on a dynojet at 1000 ft of elevation. So a 60-70WHP increase isn't out of the question. I am also on very conservative timing.
Old 05-08-2011, 11:58 PM
  #1666  
Premium Member
iTrader: (2)
 
drewbroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-08
Location: TUCSON AZ
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Matt M
There wasn't any secret. It was september/october. It was 75% ethanol at the most. The stock fuel system easily supported it at anything over 4500 RPM.
Yeah we don't get E75 down here.
Old 05-09-2011, 06:47 AM
  #1667  
Senior Member
 
raver0789's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-26-10
Location: Toronto
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice job guys!

This is something I won't be doing. IMO Dollar value isn't worth putting a few grand for this for the gains.

My next step will be fully forged zzp motor, efr turbo, stage 4 plus clutch, zzp trans, and 600whp.


In a couple of years.
Old 05-09-2011, 07:16 AM
  #1668  
Senior Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Sweetsandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-15-09
Location: Parma, OH
Posts: 4,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by raver0789
Nice job guys!

This is something I won't be doing. IMO Dollar value isn't worth putting a few grand for this for the gains.

My next step will be fully forged zzp motor, efr turbo, stage 4 plus clutch, zzp trans, and 600whp.


In a couple of years.
It's ~$1200 for the 2871 IIRC...not a few grand. Good luck with your potential future build
Old 05-09-2011, 08:32 AM
  #1669  
Senior Member
 
HHRSSouth's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-04-09
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by raver0789
Nice job guys!

This is something I won't be doing. IMO Dollar value isn't worth putting a few grand for this for the gains.

My next step will be fully forged zzp motor, efr turbo, stage 4 plus clutch, zzp trans, and 600whp.


In a couple of years.
I have $1500 into my BNR 2871, thats with me buying a new Tial Q BOV and re-tuning.

Have fun spending $2-3k + on any other turbo upgrade
Old 05-09-2011, 08:46 AM
  #1670  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Matt M
But the posted numbers are corrected, so elevation isn't really working against you.
Nope but I seriously douubt a fully bolted and tuned stock turbo LNF will make more than 320 whp on that dyno he used. Do you honestly think that it is normal for a brand new LS3 to make only 347 whp? Sorry they normally make 380-385 whp on a dynojet.

Last edited by Terminator2; 05-09-2011 at 11:51 AM.
Old 05-09-2011, 09:00 AM
  #1671  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Matt M
But then again we did 360 sae(373 std) on a Mustang dyno with the k04 on E85 when I was still running stock cams. We would need more test samples.
Your stock turbo LNF also made 240 whp on your dyno. Your mustang dyno reads higher than any other mustang dyno I have ever seen before. Stock LNFs make 210-220 whp on Mustang dynos normally. Many cars I have tuned have reached their fueling limits on the stock turbo on E-47 at 24 psi and lower whp and wtrq numbers than your shop car on E-74. Hmm I wonder why? The torque limit on E-47 is about 425 wrtq and on E-74 it is about 10% lower or ~382 wrtq.

Last edited by Terminator2; 05-09-2011 at 11:53 AM.
Old 05-09-2011, 09:04 AM
  #1672  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by drewbroo
You are correct sir. And the sheet I got is my low numbers. I will get the other sheet next week with my 398whp run
When Nick goes to dyno his 5857 turbo you should bring your car to that dynojet to redyno it. I am willing to bet it will make about 425-430 whp and 465-470 wrtq on the dynojet. Fully bolted and tuned E-47 stock turbo at 24 psi makes ~355 whp on that dyno.

Last edited by Terminator2; 05-09-2011 at 12:05 PM.
Old 05-09-2011, 12:25 PM
  #1673  
Premium Member
iTrader: (2)
 
drewbroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-08
Location: TUCSON AZ
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Terminator2
When Nick goes to dyno his 5857 turbo you should bring your car to that dynojet to redyno it. I am willing to bet it will make about 425-430 whp and 465-470 wrtq on the dynojet. Fully bolted and tuned E-47 stock turbo at 24 psi makes ~355 whp on that dyno.
I will bring it up there. Again, I am happy with the numbers I made on a mustang dyno. Also the better air up there will make for some better power.
Old 05-09-2011, 12:31 PM
  #1674  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by drewbroo
I will bring it up there. Again, I am happy with the numbers I made on a mustang dyno. Also the better air up there will make for some better power.
The dynos will correct the numbers for the DA but we both know that that mustang dyno you used reads lower than the dynojet Nick made 353 whp with the stock turbo on. I wish you would have run your car on the stock turbo on there for before vs after gains.

I am happy with the numbers as well but the torque curve could be better up top. I have 2 ideas idea that just might help that issue.

Last edited by Terminator2; 05-09-2011 at 12:36 PM.
Old 05-09-2011, 12:52 PM
  #1675  
Premium Member
iTrader: (2)
 
drewbroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-08
Location: TUCSON AZ
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Terminator2
The dynos will correct the numbers for the DA but we both know that that mustang dyno you used reads lower than the dynojet Nick made 353 whp with the stock turbo on. I wish you would have run your car on the stock turbo on there for before vs after gains.

I am happy with the numbers as well but the torque curve could be better up top. I have 2 ideas idea that just might help that issue.
I am open to anything that does gains. The shop just opened up a few weeks ago, its a really nice place. Here is pictures from there.











The vette in the pic was also an LS3 and put down in the low 340's.

here is a vid from my 398 pull.

YouTube - drew cobalt SS on the dyno

the dyno operator thought I was knocking at the end because of the power dip. (I was logging in the passenger seat and saw nothing of the sort.)


Quick Reply: Bnr k04-gt28



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:22 AM.