08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion Discuss the 2008 - 2009 Chevy Cobalt SS Turbocharged. On sale since the second quarter of 2008.

Bnr k04-gt28

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2011, 12:38 PM
  #1701  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (6)
 
BYT*SS*TURBO's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-01-09
Location: NEPA/North NJ
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We have been making well over the 400 mark on cars with a Blend Tune lately
Old 05-10-2011, 12:40 PM
  #1702  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by drewbroo
Feels like well over 400 ftlbs. My guess is 330/410 on the mustang. I am going to dyno the TF E85 tune vs the BYT E85 Tune.
I would say on a dynojet 335-340 whp and 390-400 wrtq I am thinking it will be about 10% lower than that on that mustang dyno. We will see. Your coupe fully bolted on the stock turbo was trapping 3MPH higher than the sedan IIRC.
Old 05-10-2011, 12:42 PM
  #1703  
Premium Member
iTrader: (2)
 
drewbroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-08
Location: TUCSON AZ
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BYT*SS*TURBO
We have been making well over the 400 mark on cars with a Blend Tune lately
the 4 door seems to like the full E right now. Its really likes the TF tune I have on there too. Pull wise I can't really tell a difference.
Old 05-10-2011, 12:50 PM
  #1704  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
09CobaltSS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-12-09
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,910
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
damnit I seriously wish there was e85 readily available in my area!!
Old 05-10-2011, 12:57 PM
  #1705  
Senior Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Sweetsandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-15-09
Location: Parma, OH
Posts: 4,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 09CobaltSS1
damnit I seriously wish there was e85 readily available in my area!!
It's nice
Old 05-10-2011, 01:10 PM
  #1706  
Senior Member
 
HHRSSouth's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-04-09
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by drewbroo
Feels like well over 400 ftlbs. My guess is 330/410 on the mustang. I am going to dyno the TF E85 tune vs the BYT E85 Tune.
Battle of the LNF E85 Tuners
Old 05-10-2011, 01:29 PM
  #1707  
Premium Member
iTrader: (2)
 
drewbroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-08
Location: TUCSON AZ
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am not battling any tuners, everyone I have dealt with is really good. (Other than superchips)
Old 05-10-2011, 01:30 PM
  #1708  
Banned
 
WSox33's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-09-10
Location: Chicago
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why not just get a real turbo and make some real numbers?
Old 05-10-2011, 01:32 PM
  #1709  
Senior Member
 
HHRSSouth's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-04-09
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by drewbroo
I am not battling any tuners, everyone I have dealt with is really good. (Other than superchips)
Trust me man, if you don't want to stir up any trouble, I would not post a comparison test of Trifecta vs. HPT E85 results.

Its just going to start the whole Trifecta HPT battles again that are never ending between people.
Old 05-10-2011, 01:34 PM
  #1710  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (6)
 
BYT*SS*TURBO's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-01-09
Location: NEPA/North NJ
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess 367/424 on stock turbo isn't real enough lol. Look at the dyno list and how many big turbo cars didn't make 400whp. Not to mention, the car is already worthless traction wise at this level. 3rd gear just laughs at the pavement now..

John - Growth Energy Market Development
I drive a bit out of my way to fill up BUT if you do a blend tune it will last a decent amount for you. We saw minimal gain going from 1:1 to 2:1, so you could really make it last with a E30 blend and still get the power boost

Originally Posted by HHRSSouth
Trust me man, if you don't want to stir up any trouble, I would not post a comparison test of Trifecta vs. HPT E85 results.

Its just going to start the whole Trifecta HPT battles again that are never ending between people.
Stir it up.. I haven't seen any TF customers post a over 360whp graph on E like we have.

Last edited by BYT*SS*TURBO; 05-10-2011 at 01:34 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 05-10-2011, 01:41 PM
  #1711  
Premium Member
iTrader: (2)
 
drewbroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-08
Location: TUCSON AZ
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BYT*SS*TURBO
I guess 367/424 on stock turbo isn't real enough lol. Look at the dyno list and how many big turbo cars didn't make 400whp. Not to mention, the car is already worthless traction wise at this level. 3rd gear just laughs at the pavement now..

John - Growth Energy Market Development
I drive a bit out of my way to fill up BUT if you do a blend tune it will last a decent amount for you. We saw minimal gain going from 1:1 to 2:1, so you could really make it last with a E30 blend and still get the power boost



Stir it up.. I haven't seen any TF customers post a over 360whp graph on E like we have.
its all in how much time is put into the car too. Some people don't get their car fully dialed in by vince and just throw it on a dyno.
Old 05-10-2011, 01:43 PM
  #1712  
Premium Member
iTrader: (2)
 
drewbroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-08
Location: TUCSON AZ
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WSox33
Why not just get a real turbo and make some real numbers?
I guess reading fails you, check my sig. I don't need a car with a "real turbo." Also I am all about research and development for the community, I am not all about dyno numbers, I am about the whole picture. (1/4 mile times and drivability.)

Last edited by drewbroo; 05-10-2011 at 01:52 PM.
Old 05-10-2011, 01:45 PM
  #1713  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by BYT*SS*TURBO
I guess 367/424 on stock turbo isn't real enough lol. Look at the dyno list and how many big turbo cars didn't make 400whp. Not to mention, the car is already worthless traction wise at this level. 3rd gear just laughs at the pavement now..

John - Growth Energy Market Development
I drive a bit out of my way to fill up BUT if you do a blend tune it will last a decent amount for you. We saw minimal gain going from 1:1 to 2:1, so you could really make it last with a E30 blend and still get the power boost



Stir it up.. I haven't seen any TF customers post a over 360whp graph on E like we have.
I am curious to see what Drews 4 door puts down on E-85. The torque limit on E-47 appears to be approx 430 wtrq (on that mustang dyno anyway). I still see no advantage going above E-47 in most cases.
Old 05-10-2011, 01:49 PM
  #1714  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by WSox33
Why not just get a real turbo and make some real numbers?
Because ~400 whp and 430 wtrq on a mustang dyno and a powerband from 3K-past 7K RPMs is not an improvement over stock? He already has traction issues in 3rd gear in 100* dessert heat at 3,600 ft above sea level.
Old 05-10-2011, 01:51 PM
  #1715  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (6)
 
BYT*SS*TURBO's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-01-09
Location: NEPA/North NJ
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We made 447wtq on a couple pulls with a Eblend car.
Old 05-10-2011, 01:54 PM
  #1716  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
cubaniche's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-26-09
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,804
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yeah the only real advantage to running full E is to be able to pump just once when you gas up and to minimize the fluctuations in the mix that you may get from fill up to fill up.
Old 05-10-2011, 01:59 PM
  #1717  
Premium Member
iTrader: (2)
 
drewbroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-08
Location: TUCSON AZ
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cubaniche
Yeah the only real advantage to running full E is to be able to pump just once when you gas up and to minimize the fluctuations in the mix that you may get from fill up to fill up.
I do not know why, but the powerband seems to be better on a full E car with little mods.
Old 05-10-2011, 02:02 PM
  #1718  
Former Vendor
 
Matt M's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-03-08
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Terminator2
I am not "talking ****" as you put it. What I am saying about torque limits and fueling has been proven time and time again by me and the other tuners of this site and yet your car is magic it somehow makes more torque on E-74 without hitting the fueling limit than the cars I tune on E47 or even E-30. Sorry but the torque limit on E-74 no what you do with the injector constant, rail pressure ramping and injection timing is much lower than your car was able to make on the stock fuel system. Your car made 240 whp SAE stock on your mustang dyno you posted the dyno sheets right after you picked the car up. So if you take that 10-12% difference that normally exists between a dynojet and a mustang dyno your car made 264-270 whp SAE stock on a dynojet?
1. My car doesn't have to be magic. We learn new ways to make more power. That is our job. I notice that you ignored my statement that I trapped 119mph right after I dyno'd 356 on our dyno.

2. Yes, I have seen stock LNF Cobalts make 260 on Dynojets.

3. Now you are stating that the difference between Mustang and Dynojet is 10-12%, but you have simply moved into the next topic that you still have a lot to learn about. As I'm sure you know, Mustang dynos require vehicle weight to be entered. You may also know that the number that you enter affects the hp numbers. Because of this, lighter cars do not take as much of a hit on a Mustang dyno as a heavier car. While a 4000 lb car might lose 10-15% by going from a Dynojet to a Mustang, a 300 lb car might only lose 6-10% This is something that is rarely discussed, but should be.
Old 05-10-2011, 02:03 PM
  #1719  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by BYT*SS*TURBO
We made 447wtq on a couple pulls with a Eblend car.
Different dyno though. That is why I put in parentheses on that mustang dyno.
Old 05-10-2011, 02:05 PM
  #1720  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by drewbroo
I do not know why, but the powerband seems to be better on a full E car with little mods.
Did you try E-47 in the 4 door first? Or just strait to E-85?
Old 05-10-2011, 02:08 PM
  #1721  
Former Vendor
 
Matt M's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-03-08
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Another thing that people have to realize is that we know how to get power out of cars on the dyno. Similar to what is commonly known as the driver mod, it works the same way on the dyno. It just is what it is.
Old 05-10-2011, 02:10 PM
  #1722  
Premium Member
iTrader: (2)
 
drewbroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-08
Location: TUCSON AZ
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Matt M
Another thing that people have to realize is that we know how to get power out of cars on the dyno. Similar to what is commonly known as the driver mod, it works the same way on the dyno. It just is what it is.
This is true. I wish I could have been doing the driving for my dyno pulls.
Old 05-10-2011, 02:14 PM
  #1723  
Premium Member
iTrader: (2)
 
drewbroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-08
Location: TUCSON AZ
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Matt M
1. My car doesn't have to be magic. We learn new ways to make more power. That is our job. I notice that you ignored my statement that I trapped 119mph right after I dyno'd 356 on our dyno.

2. Yes, I have seen stock LNF Cobalts make 260 on Dynojets.

3. Now you are stating that the difference between Mustang and Dynojet is 10-12%, but you have simply moved into the next topic that you still have a lot to learn about. As I'm sure you know, Mustang dynos require vehicle weight to be entered. You may also know that the number that you enter affects the hp numbers. Because of this, lighter cars do not take as much of a hit on a Mustang dyno as a heavier car. While a 4000 lb car might lose 10-15% by going from a Dynojet to a Mustang, a 300 lb car might only lose 6-10% This is something that is rarely discussed, but should be.
The dyno I was on you enter in the weight of the car. Anyways, the car will be dyno'd on the same dyno so I can see what real world gains I get.
Old 05-10-2011, 02:18 PM
  #1724  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by drewbroo
This is true. I wish I could have been doing the driving for my dyno pulls.
That and he used 4th gear on the pulls. Although we have no perfect 1.00 : 1.00 gear fourth is technically an overdrive gear at 0.89. Third gear is 1.19 so neither is perfect but I like to use 3rd gear. When you do the sedan ask him to do both fourth and third gear pulls to see what the difference is.
Old 05-10-2011, 02:19 PM
  #1725  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Gremlin85's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-01-09
Location: Wheh ah we? MA.
Posts: 9,999
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Terminator2
That and he used 4th gear on the pulls. Although we have no perfect 1.00 : 1.00 gear fourth is technically an overdrive gear at 0.89. Third gear is 1.19 so neither is perfect but I like to use 3rd gear. When you do the sedan ask him to do both fourth and third gear pulls to see what the difference is.
I've done 3rd and 4th gear pulls and saw no difference in power at the wheels. I found it odd.


Quick Reply: Bnr k04-gt28



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:26 AM.