Anyone see Matt's prototype dual injector setup?
#4
I heard about it. But haven't seen it yet. I talked about doing this for a big turbo a year and a half ago before we were able to raise the fuel pressure. Don't have facebook to see the pics.
#15
#17
i may not post much, but do you ever have anything positive to say? I get it you think your parts are the best, but it doesnt mean you have to be a douche to zzp or others...honestly I wouldve bought a few things from you guys but your attitude towards zzp in other threads made me not....
#18
i may not post much, but do you ever have anything positive to say? I get it you think your parts are the best, but it doesnt mean you have to be a douche to zzp or others...honestly I wouldve bought a few things from you guys but your attitude towards zzp in other threads made me not....
I never once brought up werks, on this subject. So, I would appreciate if you wouldn't be so quick to take this post simply as negativity. Its simply me looking for information on the setup, not bashing.
#19
i may not post much, but do you ever have anything positive to say? I get it you think your parts are the best, but it doesnt mean you have to be a douche to zzp or others...honestly I wouldve bought a few things from you guys but your attitude towards zzp in other threads made me not....
#20
#21
What did I say that was wrong there, sir? All I said is that BTF has done it for years, meaning, its been done, and its been proven. then I raised an issue that has been raised in numerous different platforms that I follow (many of the issues being raised on hondas), when running secondary injectors. The issue being fuel aggregation on the opposite side of the intake manifold. This is a real problem, and I would like to see if ZZP has a solution to that. Fuel aggregation is a real problem when adding secondary injectors to ANY intake manifold, whether it be ours, or a Skunk2 on a honda.
I never once brought up werks, on this subject. So, I would appreciate if you wouldn't be so quick to take this post simply as negativity. Its simply me looking for information on the setup, not bashing.
I never once brought up werks, on this subject. So, I would appreciate if you wouldn't be so quick to take this post simply as negativity. Its simply me looking for information on the setup, not bashing.
#22
Thats what I am trying to do. Its not new, at all. Its just relatively unseen. 90% of the people over here don't even know who BTF is, I am willing to bet. I was just saying this is a proven setup. It works. But I just wanna know how well it works, due to fuel aggregation. Thats it!
#23
As of right now, I am running my car with the stock turbo and E85. I was able to put down 355whp sae on the DI injectors only(2800psi). I then installed the port fuel injectors and put down exactly the same power with the DI injectors providing ~2/3 of the fuel and the port injectors providing ~1/3. This was good news since I was afraid that we might lose a little power due to the port injection not being able to utilize the benefits of direct injection. My theory is that above 25% duty cycle, DI gains are quickly diminishing. In other words, the shortened pulses of the DI system are helping at least as much as the port injection is hurting.
#24
As of right now, I am running my car with the stock turbo and E85. I was able to put down 355whp sae on the DI injectors only(2800psi). I then installed the port fuel injectors and put down exactly the same power with the DI injectors providing ~2/3 of the fuel and the port injectors providing ~1/3. This was good news since I was afraid that we might lose a little power due to the port injection not being able to utilize the benefits of direct injection. My theory is that above 25% duty cycle, DI gains are quickly diminishing. In other words, the shortened pulses of the DI system are helping at least as much as the port injection is hurting.
#25
Yes, they are angled nearly 45 degrees.