Drewbroo's Tune review Part II - Superchips, HP, TF (With Dyno comparrison sheets)
#26
Elevation plays a big factor, Most people from your area run a half second + faster than people in my area with comparable mods. Hence why all the people on the leaderboard running 12&11's are from the northeast.
#28
ALso SIR's track prep sucks, Getting a good 60ft is hard there. Although I did cut a few 2.1's in the coupe there.
#30
#32
93+ is good for track days. In my coupe I run the E85 mix for track days and fun nights. I run 91 Oct in it when its just going back and forth to work.
#34
Tip in knock due to too much advance around 100% airload (mid loads) is the issue on 91 octane as far as timing is concerned. My car will knock sometimes on tip on on stock midload advance and 93 octane.
#36
Coupe is 50 lbs lighter than the sedan. 3000 lbs vs 2950. Although with the mods he has on the coupe I bet they are within 25 lbs of each other.
#38
I think this makes me an LNF Fanboi
Yeah the coupe is pretty heavily modded, I can't even compare the 2.
Yeah the coupe is pretty heavily modded, I can't even compare the 2.
Last edited by drewbroo; 03-05-2011 at 02:16 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#39
I ran an E Blend on my own car today and a gas tune car has 0 chance lol. So yea, there's no comparing the 2. I will say catless plus E Blend is a bit stinky lol..
414wtq, stock clutch and holding! 346whp (still cant rev over 6k and with a busted 2nd gear too lol)
414wtq, stock clutch and holding! 346whp (still cant rev over 6k and with a busted 2nd gear too lol)
#40
#41
I might bug you for an E-Blend tune in the near future then.....
#43
DIALED IN ON BOTH TUNES IN THE SEDAN, ran at SIR today, vids up in a bit
Results were very close here are the times
BYT Tune Run 1: 13.609@106.09
TF Tune Run 2: 13.544@106.66
Waited for it to cool off a bit, it was 79 degrees
BYT Tune Run 3: 13.293@106.42
TF Tune Run 4: 13.271@106.62
This is the 91 OCT Tune at 3200 Actual elevation, calculated DA at 7900 ft.
Results were very close here are the times
BYT Tune Run 1: 13.609@106.09
TF Tune Run 2: 13.544@106.66
Waited for it to cool off a bit, it was 79 degrees
BYT Tune Run 3: 13.293@106.42
TF Tune Run 4: 13.271@106.62
This is the 91 OCT Tune at 3200 Actual elevation, calculated DA at 7900 ft.
#44
DIALED IN ON BOTH TUNES IN THE SEDAN, ran at SIR today, vids up in a bit
Results were very close here are the times
BYT Tune Run 1: 13.609@106.09
TF Tune Run 2: 13.544@106.66
Waited for it to cool off a bit, it was 79 degrees
BYT Tune Run 3: 13.293@106.42
TF Tune Run 4: 13.271@106.62
This is the 91 OCT Tune at 3200 Actual elevation, calculated DA at 7900 ft.
Results were very close here are the times
BYT Tune Run 1: 13.609@106.09
TF Tune Run 2: 13.544@106.66
Waited for it to cool off a bit, it was 79 degrees
BYT Tune Run 3: 13.293@106.42
TF Tune Run 4: 13.271@106.62
This is the 91 OCT Tune at 3200 Actual elevation, calculated DA at 7900 ft.
#45
Both tunes are too fricking close to call, i can't say one is better than the other. Boost levels are the same on both. Here is a vid of the 13.6 run with my wifes cell phone cam.
YouTube - 13.6 in Cobalt SS Sedan
YouTube - 13.6 in Cobalt SS Sedan
#46
Both tunes are too fricking close to call, i can't say one is better than the other. Boost levels are the same on both. Here is a vid of the 13.6 run with my wifes cell phone cam.
YouTube - 13.6 in Cobalt SS Sedan
YouTube - 13.6 in Cobalt SS Sedan
#47
#48
Never heard this, Texas state wide is 93 octrane and regular 87 oct.
#50
I take it you have never been to el-paso or vanhorn. The closer you get to mexico the lower the OCT rating. Also up towards san angelo its back to 91 again. San Antonio, Dallas and Houston all have 93 Oct. I have driven through texas quite a few times, and am periodically there for months at a time.
Thanks
Last edited by drewbroo; 03-06-2011 at 07:18 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost