Figure I can tell you guys now...
#126
I NLS'ed maybe a handful of times on stock tune when I first got the car but I dont do that anymore at all.... still seems wrong and too harsh, so I'll stick to the tried and true old fashion way.
#127
Pussies! I used to NLS the **** out of my SS/TC all the time when i was tuned and never had an issue with the car. GM before the car being released tested NLS a little over 1200 times, opened the tranny and saw that it was good to go still. I can understand on a big turbo but come on, on the stock, please.
I tried for the longest time to get a group of people together for a Shep trans. All he needed was 10 people with $1000. He would of made a bulletproof trans but you guys are a bunch of broke ***** as in a course of a month I was only able to gather like 5 willing to step up.
I tried for the longest time to get a group of people together for a Shep trans. All he needed was 10 people with $1000. He would of made a bulletproof trans but you guys are a bunch of broke ***** as in a course of a month I was only able to gather like 5 willing to step up.
#128
Pussies! I used to NLS the **** out of my SS/TC all the time when i was tuned and never had an issue with the car. GM before the car being released tested NLS a little over 1200 times, opened the tranny and saw that it was good to go still. I can understand on a big turbo but come on, on the stock, please.
I tried for the longest time to get a group of people together for a Shep trans. All he needed was 10 people with $1000. He would of made a bulletproof trans but you guys are a bunch of broke ***** as in a course of a month I was only able to gather like 5 willing to step up.
I tried for the longest time to get a group of people together for a Shep trans. All he needed was 10 people with $1000. He would of made a bulletproof trans but you guys are a bunch of broke ***** as in a course of a month I was only able to gather like 5 willing to step up.
#129
Even with that kinda name it was hard getting people. It got frustrating and this is a guy helping the Cobalt guys that doesn't even have one anymore. I know FF_ace kinda took over that thread. Not sure what happened.
#130
Its going to cost a lot more then a grand for a built trans...... hell billet input shafts aren't cheap let alone when you start building additional gears..... so I hope the 1000 was just a deposit when the rest due at completion. Sheppard does good stuff but its far from cheap
#134
thats right, it was just a name. Shep doesn't know **** about GM F35. Sure he may know about DSMs and EVOs but you want people to put up a grand for a transmission that has never been tested? what if you put up your grand and he builds one, it doesn't hold any more power than the stock trans, and you get screwed. Thats why nobody bothered with it.
#135
thats right, it was just a name. Shep doesn't know **** about GM F35. Sure he may know about DSMs and EVOs but you want people to put up a grand for a transmission that has never been tested? what if you put up your grand and he builds one, it doesn't hold any more power than the stock trans, and you get screwed. Thats why nobody bothered with it.
I think the problem was that its a lot of money to give up on while relying on 9 other people to do the same. If somone was really that set on it, they would come up with the $10k themselves and then take a cut of the sales from the first 10 trans sold to recoup their money....
*cough* *cough* zzp *cough* *cough*
#137
It's ok, if that's the build you planned, but I can tell you that just with my turbo kit and stock engine, I'm putting down 410whp on a conservative tune, that's great for a DD, it has been over a year that I have it and so far I didn't have any problem. I was thinking that to get a fully built bottom engine, you were looking at at least 500whp
Unless you were to graph things in excel over one another to see the differences, you're basically trying to compare dick sizes without actually busting out the tape measure and sword fighting.
Good luck on your quest man. You've got a great base. It's time to turn up the wick now.
Doesn't look bad at all. Nice numbers kdub. Very respectable on that dyno from what I've gathered.
#138
[QUOTE=Doesn't look bad at all. Nice numbers kdub. Very respectable on that dyno from what I've gathered. [/QUOTE]
Thanks man I really appreciate it! Those are very good numbers for that dyno and on 93 without any meth or added ethanol.
Thanks man I really appreciate it! Those are very good numbers for that dyno and on 93 without any meth or added ethanol.
#140
thats right, it was just a name. Shep doesn't know **** about GM F35. Sure he may know about DSMs and EVOs but you want people to put up a grand for a transmission that has never been tested? what if you put up your grand and he builds one, it doesn't hold any more power than the stock trans, and you get screwed. Thats why nobody bothered with it.
#141
Last edited by Dawgz83948; 12-18-2012 at 05:03 PM.
#142
meh, you are missing the point. I never said shep was a moron, i just said he didnt know the F35 that well. So what he builds GTR Transmissions, I simply stated that the reason people didnt pony up the money cause there was no definite guarantee this would work. It was all R&D. GM/Chrysler/Ford dont go "hey guys, before we build a car we need 10 people to donate 10k and then the rest on completion.
#143
meh, you are missing the point. I never said shep was a moron, i just said he didnt know the F35 that well. So what he builds GTR Transmissions, I simply stated that the reason people didnt pony up the money cause there was no definite guarantee this would work. It was all R&D. GM/Chrysler/Ford dont go "hey guys, before we build a car we need 10 people to donate 10k and then the rest on completion.
#144
oh nevermind, Im done lol
#145
#147
You aren't putting down 410whp on a loaded mustang dyno like the OP are you? If you didn't use a load based dyno, you're comparing apples to oranges as the load based dyno will not throw down the "hero" numbers. You're also trying to comparing peak numbers. Spool time, power under the curve, how well the curve carries etc is what matters.
Unless you were to graph things in excel over one another to see the differences, you're basically trying to compare dick sizes without actually busting out the tape measure and sword fighting.
Good luck on your quest man. You've got a great base. It's time to turn up the wick now.
Doesn't look bad at all. Nice numbers kdub. Very respectable on that dyno from what I've gathered.
Unless you were to graph things in excel over one another to see the differences, you're basically trying to compare dick sizes without actually busting out the tape measure and sword fighting.
Good luck on your quest man. You've got a great base. It's time to turn up the wick now.
Doesn't look bad at all. Nice numbers kdub. Very respectable on that dyno from what I've gathered.
My guess is kdub's numbers would be closer to 460whp on a dynojet.
Kdub, my only concern is the boost spike you're seeing on tip-in. That's a tranny killer. Are you using the stock boost control?
Last edited by Ch1ck3n; 12-27-2012 at 11:52 AM.
#148
Well guys back to PWerks I go! Me and Dave have decided it was time to ditch the reducer from the turbo to the intake pipe and we are building a 4" intake! Thing is gonna be massive. We have a baseline tune right now, so we will be able to see gains/losses. Also going to be throwing on the Powell PCV system while shes down. End of the summer I will be going with cams/5th injector. Just don't have the time right now.
#149
Well guys back to PWerks I go! Me and Dave have decided it was time to ditch the reducer from the turbo to the intake pipe and we are building a 4" intake! Thing is gonna be massive. We have a baseline tune right now, so we will be able to see gains/losses. Also going to be throwing on the Powell PCV system while shes down. End of the summer I will be going with cams/5th injector. Just don't have the time right now.