2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

LNF R&D Updates

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-2010 | 11:52 AM
  #26  
peachpuff's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-14-08
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 1
From: around the world
I wish more vendors put this much r&d into the lnf, the engine has been out for over 3 years now and only now its basically getting picked apart and pushed to the limits, kudos to zzp.
Old 01-09-2010 | 11:56 AM
  #27  
09CobaltSS1's Avatar
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 04-12-09
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 15
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by 06blackg85ss
eh they will still cost around the same in the beginning. custom rods aren't the cheapest thing. I had em in my motor when it blew and they came out still looking brand new lol.
I paid $865 shipped for a set of custom rods from pauter, not going to get too much cheaper with a forged rod maybe in the $550-$650 range setup since it's not really going to be a big seller in the aftermarket world
definitely true, but **** $200-$300 less is still 23%-35% less per set and an H-beam rod in a 4 banger can support somewhere around 800-900hp.. any money saved is good in my book..
Old 01-09-2010 | 12:22 PM
  #28  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by Black08SSTC
wow, so basically an S252 and Tuning would put me around 415hp??
415 to the wheels is pretty easy with fuel pressure raised to 2800.

Originally Posted by 208REV
So I have to ask, what is it gonna cost, preliminary prices of course, and when is it going to be up for purchase?

And one other thing... have you guys thought about an e85 tune, here in boise a lot of the higher hp cars such as evo's and supra's and things are all on e85 and if I were to invest in such a kit, I would love to have the option to be a part of the e85 army here in boise.
We have to do a cost breakdown before we can release a price, but we are working to keep this kit very affordable.

E85 is a poor choice for the LNF. Even with more than 3000psi, we couldn't deliver enough E85 to support the airflow of the stock turbo.

Originally Posted by blackbird
Nice information and while perhaps not up to that type of abuse, it is a testament to the stock rods that they didn't suffer a catastrophic failure. Are you still altering the signal from the pressure sensor on the rail or only with calibration adjustments in the tune?
We are only using the ECM fuel pressure control at this time.

Originally Posted by blownss06
So the rods bent at 500hp+ they should be fine for guys only wanting 425hp. great work ZZP looking forward to that intercooler your working on and this turbo kit of course.
I agree. I would rate them to 400whp for extended use and occasional hits to 425. 450 is stressing them pretty good.

We are going to tear down Ryan's motor(LSJ) soon as well. I'm expecting to find the same problem.

Last edited by Matt M; 01-09-2010 at 12:22 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 01-09-2010 | 12:25 PM
  #29  
SuperchargedSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-07-05
Posts: 3,533
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Great work. Another testament to the mighty lnf...
Old 01-09-2010 | 12:45 PM
  #30  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by stevessvt
I wonder if the rods bent on the run you did that went to the a/f of 9.....causing mild hydro lock. Isnt there a theory that some of the other pistons had popped from being too rich, and they weren't close to a 9 a/f ratio.
9:1 wouldn't be anywhere close to causing hydro-lock. People running methanol run far richer than that, and they often run a lot more boost, meaning even more fuel.

Originally Posted by efactor
that's some good stuff. is that the stock rod? correct me if I'm wrong.
Yes, stock rod.

Originally Posted by oldskool
500 ft lbs in the mid range!

So how was it running with the bent rods? Did you notice knocking or strange noises?

This is amazing work overall. I wish you guys supported the kappa platform, but i think i'll trade my cav for an LNF solstice soon enough
It ran 11.43 on the bent rods. That was the last day I ran the car before it was taken apart. There were no signs .

Originally Posted by 06blackg85ss
eh they will still cost around the same in the beginning. custom rods aren't the cheapest thing. I had em in my motor when it blew and they came out still looking brand new lol.
I paid $865 shipped for a set of custom rods from pauter, not going to get too much cheaper with a forged rod maybe in the $550-$650 range setup since it's not really going to be a big seller in the aftermarket world
We'd like to be in the $650 range, but that will be difficult in low quantity. We will have to see how it pans out.

Originally Posted by stevessvt
Well, I guess hydrolock wasnt the correct wording, but I wonder if the bent rods are connected to the rich afr.
No, they just bent from trying to push too much power through them. GM doesn't rate them for anywhere near the power I was running.

Originally Posted by 09CobaltSS1
definitely true, but **** $200-$300 less is still 23%-35% less per set and an H-beam rod in a 4 banger can support somewhere around 800-900hp.. any money saved is good in my book..
The problem with having rods made by companies like Eagle is that they get costs down by running high quantity only. We would have to invest in hundreds of sets, which might take years to sell. Of course we would sell more since the price would be lower. It's just a gamble either way.

Last edited by Matt M; 01-09-2010 at 12:45 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 01-09-2010 | 01:58 PM
  #31  
mkriebs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-12-09
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Good to know... I will definitely be building my bottom end next year though. Hopefully with your stroker kit **AHEM** Lol... so I'm persistent...
Old 01-09-2010 | 04:58 PM
  #32  
Tennpenn83's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-13-07
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
very impressive matt.
Old 01-09-2010 | 05:50 PM
  #33  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 3
From: WI
What is wrong with using the aftermarket LNF rods that are already available?



How did the pistons look when you took them out?

I have read a lot of LNF guys having problems with #1.

Does ZZP plan on developing their own LNF pistons or will you use the Wiseco ones?
Old 01-09-2010 | 06:18 PM
  #34  
PrincessTurbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-09
Posts: 2,803
Likes: 1
From: In the mountains
Originally Posted by ebristol
What is wrong with using the aftermarket LNF rods that are already available?



How did the pistons look when you took them out?

I have read a lot of LNF guys having problems with #1.

Does ZZP plan on developing their own LNF pistons or will you use the Wiseco ones?
damn they look good enough to support 600 HP

.

See I knew if I showed some hate they would prevail and show us whats up...LOL
Altering the Fuel signal tricking the ECU very cool man this is exciting to know ,

I would be down for a set of Pistons , rods and valve springs , new turbo, Voltage Manipulator, but is this going to be a "Trifecta" only tune included because Vince is the only one with fuel table access or what ?

A lot of guys aren't going to want to throw away their HPT's for a canned turbo tune kit , not everyone lives in the same climate elevation etc , so I suppose if HPT gets their head out their asses you will have a base calibration to be sent for HPT guys ?
Old 01-09-2010 | 06:27 PM
  #35  
ls1fbody's Avatar
Haz l33t wheelz.
 
Joined: 09-14-07
Posts: 18,891
Likes: 3
From: Costa Mesa CA
Originally Posted by mkriebs
Good to know... I will definitely be building my bottom end next year though. Hopefully with your stroker kit **AHEM** Lol... so I'm persistent...
why would you want a stroker kit?
Old 01-09-2010 | 06:37 PM
  #36  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by ebristol
What is wrong with using the aftermarket LNF rods that are already available?

How did the pistons look when you took them out?

I have read a lot of LNF guys having problems with #1.

Does ZZP plan on developing their own LNF pistons or will you use the Wiseco ones?
Those rods are too expensive.

#1 piston was starting to fail as well.

We will likely be going with JE.
Old 01-09-2010 | 06:41 PM
  #37  
09CobaltSS1's Avatar
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 04-12-09
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 15
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by ebristol
What is wrong with using the aftermarket LNF rods that are already available?



How did the pistons look when you took them out?

I have read a lot of LNF guys having problems with #1.

Does ZZP plan on developing their own LNF pistons or will you use the Wiseco ones?
hmm I forgot those were around.. I mentioned forged H-beam before and got shot down.. well I guess pictures speak louder than words.. $974.99?? Extremely expensive though.. wow
Old 01-09-2010 | 06:41 PM
  #38  
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 37,073
Likes: 2
From: The 405
wouldn't the bent rods be a cause for lower hp numbers as well? i mean, when you take something straight, and bend it. the overall length decreases. so wouldn't a bend rod=shorter rod. which would lower compression and in turn horsepower as well.... wouldn't it?
Old 01-09-2010 | 06:46 PM
  #39  
NME's Avatar
NME
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 06-11-08
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: florida
So the new set up isnt using the voltage device to raise fuel pressure and its being done through the ECM now?
Old 01-09-2010 | 07:02 PM
  #40  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by PrincessTurbo

I would be down for a set of Pistons , rods and valve springs , new turbo, Voltage Manipulator, but is this going to be a "Trifecta" only tune included because Vince is the only one with fuel table access or what ?

A lot of guys aren't going to want to throw away their HPT's for a canned turbo tune kit , not everyone lives in the same climate elevation etc , so I suppose if HPT gets their head out their asses you will have a base calibration to be sent for HPT guys ?
Vince set up the base files for me, but I am tuning on the dyno with HP Tuners. Hopefully we can set something up to allow others to tune as well.

Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921
wouldn't the bent rods be a cause for lower hp numbers as well? i mean, when you take something straight, and bend it. the overall length decreases. so wouldn't a bend rod=shorter rod. which would lower compression and in turn horsepower as well.... wouldn't it?
Yes, but I doubt it was much of a loss.

Originally Posted by NME
So the new set up isnt using the voltage device to raise fuel pressure and its being done through the ECM now?
Correct.

Ok, here are the updates for today-
On Friday, Vince sent me a file in which the ECM reports fuel pressure through the O2 B1S2 pid. I don't know how he does this stuff, but he did and it works. Unfortunately, I didn't have any way to accurately scale the data without adding in another gauge or referencing the voltage signal from the sensor. I will get to that another day. However, I did notice that fuel pressure was falling off quite a bit. This was bad because we need to keep injector duty cycles under 35%, especially at higher RPMs. After messing around with the DALs trying to get the ECM boost control set up I noticed the fuel pressure holding much better up top. I'm not sure if it is related or if the ECM is just learning the regulator duty cycles, but it was a pleasant surprise.

After a few pulls, I got the boost to fade slightly, allowing for a wider power band without any misfires from excessively long injector pulses. Here is the dyno chart for the last pull:

467whp on 93 octane!
453 ft lbs!
400+ whp from 4600rpm on!

Remember- these are uncorrected HP numbers. With sae correction, whp was around 435 because it's cold as F here in MI. I'm using uncorrected numbers to demonstrate the potential of the fuel system with the Trifecta tweaks in the ECM.

Cliff notes:
LNF kicks ass.
Bullseye s252et kicks ass.
Trifecta kicks ass.
People who buy this setup will kick ass.

Last edited by Matt M; 01-09-2010 at 07:07 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 01-09-2010 | 07:16 PM
  #41  
Black08SSTC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-10-08
Posts: 5,678
Likes: 2
From: North Jersey
OMG i want the S252 now!! ill be more than happy with 400-410 whp!! PM Me, ill drive my car out to Grand Rapids drop it off and pic it up in April!!
Old 01-09-2010 | 10:49 PM
  #42  
agent007kimball's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-08
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
From: East Windsor, NJ & Scranton, PA
Very impressive results and I applaud the public documentation of your progress.

Just a few questions though.....How did you find this setup to behave on the street? Was driveability signifigantly compromised? How about gas mileage?

By any chance did you get to take a look at the transmission? How is that holding up?
Old 01-09-2010 | 11:16 PM
  #43  
mongorat427's Avatar
Premium Member
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: 07-23-09
Posts: 6,064
Likes: 9
From: pittsburgh
Rods

Originally Posted by Matt M
Those rods are too expensive.

#1 piston was starting to fail as well.

We will likely be going with JE.
How much are they ? There has to be someone who would make a 100 sets. We need to see how many people will actually buy a set though.
Old 01-09-2010 | 11:16 PM
  #44  
Kildore's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-18-09
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Man.. you guys are really getting into the mud on this one. Keep up the good work! LNF FTW!
Old 01-09-2010 | 11:55 PM
  #45  
MaxVQ35DE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-17-08
Posts: 1,605
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
i need a solstice or sky STAT!
Old 01-10-2010 | 04:21 AM
  #46  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,911
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
this kicks ass
Old 01-10-2010 | 04:35 AM
  #47  
OriGinaL Condo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-27-08
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Linden, New Jersey
Gotta love the guys over at ZZP. Always pushing the 'balt further
Old 01-10-2010 | 04:55 AM
  #48  
09BlueBaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-13-09
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 0
From: Davie, Fl
What makes the torque curve fall off so hard on these engines? Between 4700rpm and redline youve lost like 125ftlbs. Could this be helped with tuning or is it just the nature of the lnf?
Old 01-10-2010 | 12:27 PM
  #49  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by Black08SSTC
OMG i want the S252 now!! ill be more than happy with 400-410 whp!! PM Me, ill drive my car out to Grand Rapids drop it off and pic it up in April!!
Bring it out. We can get you set up.

Originally Posted by agent007kimball
Very impressive results and I applaud the public documentation of your progress.

Just a few questions though.....How did you find this setup to behave on the street? Was driveability signifigantly compromised? How about gas mileage?

By any chance did you get to take a look at the transmission? How is that holding up?
I don't have street miles on this particular turbo due to winter conditions, but I can say that it starts and runs like stock and drives perfectly on the dyno.

The trans still feels fine, but we did not open it up.

Last edited by Matt M; 01-10-2010 at 12:27 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 01-10-2010 | 12:30 PM
  #50  
PrincessTurbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-09
Posts: 2,803
Likes: 1
From: In the mountains
Originally Posted by 09BlueBaltSS
What makes the torque curve fall off so hard on these engines? Between 4700rpm and redline youve lost like 125ftlbs. Could this be helped with tuning or is it just the nature of the lnf?
fuel fuel fuel

Originally Posted by Matt M
Bring it out. We can get you set up.



I don't have street miles on this particular turbo due to winter conditions, but I can say that it starts and runs like stock and drives perfectly on the dyno.

The trans still feels fine, but we did not open it up.
450HP would be fine with me as well , I don't want to HAVE to replace the internals but who does LOL I guess you could always wait for the stuff to break or do it right the first time , that would cost a pretty penny it sounds like Pistons, Rods ,Valve Springs, Turbo Kit, clutch ,
you are looking at 6500K easy

Last edited by PrincessTurbo; 01-10-2010 at 12:30 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:32 AM.