Treadstone Stage 4 Review/Install
#155
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-19-09
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah i was going to do it but ended up going the S256et route. It's a great looking kit, i hope you make some sick power on it.
#158
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
i been doin sum reading and the best comparison i found was on a test done at perrin comparing the gtx3076r with the .82 housing to the .63 housing and they made more power with the .82 housing which spools a lil faster and makes the same power as the old gt3582 turbos. im deployed so my power curve when i get bac i want atleast 530whp when its all said and done. my friend went with the 6262 but i plan on driving mines in the street dnt want to not enjoy my car waiting for boost. so i think that gives me a gud median to go higher if i want but be pleased with my current goal. so to clearify when i order this turbo i want just a T3 housing? or should i get a Vband not to clear on choice at this point of the build so far i selected turbo and i want the Tial housing but the flange is the last step and im confused.
#159
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-19-09
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You are talking about two different things here. The T3 refers to the housing of the turbo, such as the part that bolts into the manifold. The tial flange is the flange for the wastegate.
#160
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-19-09
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#162
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-19-09
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You do realize that it will be a much much slower spool than the .63ar, correct? It should make a little more power up top but at the cost of the lower rpm power loss and lag it may in fact be slower unless you are brake boosting the f*ck out of it or racing from 5200rpms-7000rpm. Powerbands do matter. Bigger is not always better.
#164
You do realize that it will be a much much slower spool than the .63ar, correct? It should make a little more power up top but at the cost of the lower rpm power loss and lag it may in fact be slower unless you are brake boosting the f*ck out of it or racing from 5200rpms-7000rpm. Powerbands do matter. Bigger is not always better.
#165
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
You do realize that it will be a much much slower spool than the .63ar, correct? It should make a little more power up top but at the cost of the lower rpm power loss and lag it may in fact be slower unless you are brake boosting the f*ck out of it or racing from 5200rpms-7000rpm. Powerbands do matter. Bigger is not always better.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post