2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Trifecta gets it done: Fuel tables unlocked

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-15-2009, 06:06 PM
  #176  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
ei3dag3's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-23-08
Posts: 4,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
slowbalt84, i posted another thread with videos in there with the first, and not datalogged tune.

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2-0l-lnf-performance-tech-153/lnf-trifeca-tune-18-24-psi-195750/
Old 11-15-2009, 06:12 PM
  #177  
Senior Member
 
slowbalt84's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-03-09
Location: Warrenton, MO
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok excellent I will check it out right now. thanks
Old 11-15-2009, 07:42 PM
  #178  
Senior Member
 
Stamina's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-09-09
Location: Tejas
Posts: 4,377
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by HHRSSouth
So the 20g upgrade for the LNF isn't a true 20g upgrade? What or who is the maker of the 20g upgrade for the LNF? Because I have a MHI TDO6-20G sitting in my garage and a MHI big 16g, the 20g is huge compared to the big 16g.
I think this may be what people are talking about. http://www.turbosystem.com/ProjectVe...C%20Turbos.htm

It's a Hahn kit using a modified Mitsubishi 20G turbo.

MHI = Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, so it would be the same minus the portion that Hahn mods.
Old 11-15-2009, 07:44 PM
  #179  
Senior Member
 
slowbalt84's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-03-09
Location: Warrenton, MO
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nope definitely not the kit i am talking about. The one i am talking about will be a lot cheaper. like half the price since hahn is overpriced like a biotch
Old 11-15-2009, 07:45 PM
  #180  
Senior Member
 
Stamina's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-09-09
Location: Tejas
Posts: 4,377
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by slowbalt84
nope definitely not the kit i am talking about. The one i am talking about will be a lot cheaper. like half the price since hahn is overpriced like a biotch
Any links/info?
Old 11-15-2009, 08:18 PM
  #181  
Senior Member
 
slowbalt84's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-03-09
Location: Warrenton, MO
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no links as the company is in the process of testing it. It's dejon lol. I can't keep my mouth shut lol
Old 11-16-2009, 06:03 AM
  #182  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
oopsitouchedmyself's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-15-09
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dejon is crap, cheaper products, worse quality.
Old 11-16-2009, 09:31 AM
  #183  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
kidcrash603's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-12-08
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by oopsitouchedmyself
dejon is crap, cheaper products, worse quality.
I have nothing but good things to say about my dejon products.... The service and personality of the owner on the other hand is crap!
Old 11-16-2009, 10:26 AM
  #184  
Senior Member
 
slowbalt84's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-03-09
Location: Warrenton, MO
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by oopsitouchedmyself
dejon is crap, cheaper products, worse quality.
really? name one product on the ss/tc thats crap.
intake? everyone's is crap
downpipe? its just a metal pipe.
boost piping? i have had it for over 15,000 miles and works great

so seriously if you have an opinion but have no facts then don't talk.
Old 11-16-2009, 11:31 AM
  #185  
Senior Member
 
buellfooll's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-28-08
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by slowbalt84
really? name one product on the ss/tc thats crap.
intake? everyone's is crap
downpipe? its just a metal pipe.
boost piping? i have had it for over 15,000 miles and works great

so seriously if you have an opinion but have no facts then don't talk.
The only way anybody is ever going to be able to realistically compare aftermarket parts is to have one of each part from each manufacturer lined up and inspected by one independent tester then installed on one test vehicle and run on the same dyno and then around town on the same roads for a week. Each part going through the same set of inspections and tests. Then and ONLY then would you have an HONEST comparison.

Till then "to each his own".

I happen to like my CIA stuff. Enough so that I have ALL their stuff. CAI, Boost tubing and down pipe. After buying the first piece, the catted down pipe, and installing it I decided to stick with CIA. Each and every piece seems to be well designed and manufactured using what I accept as the best materials. Fit and finish of each part is nothing short of beautiful. The under hood parts definately compliment my engine compartment and the down pipe not only improves the performance but sounds GREAT. The prices are not the cheapest around but I learned a LONG time ago through trial and a lot of errors (expensive errors) that cheapest is NOT usually the best. Neither is the most expensive. When you GET what you PAY for you got a good deal. Then you have to consider the PEOPLE you deal with at CIA. Dan is easy to talk to, communicates well and will make you feel like one of the family. He's been in the aftermarket business a while and knows the business.

P.T. Barnum said it best. "There's an ass for EVERY seat". Take it from there!
Old 11-16-2009, 01:27 PM
  #186  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by slowbalt84
really? name one product on the ss/tc thats crap.
intake? everyone's is crap
downpipe? its just a metal pipe.
boost piping? i have had it for over 15,000 miles and works great

so seriously if you have an opinion but have no facts then don't talk.
With the exception of AEM's Silicone elbow blunder, and the SRIs that seem to be very difficult to get dialed in because of vastly fluctuating IATs. It just takes some tuning to get everything running much better with most if not all intakes.
Old 11-16-2009, 01:36 PM
  #187  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
fshizl's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-01-09
Location: Chino Hills
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Terminator2
With the exception of AEM's Silicone elbow blunder, and the SRIs that seem to be very difficult to get dialed in because of vastly fluctuating IATs. It just takes some tuning to get everything running much better with most if not all intakes.
you said it perfectly... i love how everyone says intakes are crap.. however, if you have a good tuner that knows what he is doing, that intake will actually help you out.
Old 11-16-2009, 01:52 PM
  #188  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by fshizl
you said it perfectly... i love how everyone says intakes are crap.. however, if you have a good tuner that knows what he is doing, that intake will actually help you out.
As long as your intake does not collapse at high levels of Vac. Because of the longer length of the CAIs though there can be a reduction in low end and midrange even when tuned for the intake. Tofu dynoed his car before and after his Injen intake and it gained 10 whp up top but lost power in the midrange.
Old 04-14-2010, 11:10 PM
  #189  
Senior Member
 
pookie025's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-10-09
Location: east hartford, connecticut
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
vince any tune update with the raised fuel pressure?
Old 04-14-2010, 11:27 PM
  #190  
Member
Thread Starter
 
VinceTrifecta's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-09-08
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pookie025
vince any tune update with the raised fuel pressure?
Well, I've had my car back at the dyno with it running at 2600psi (it's been running that much pressure since I made this original post), it didn't seem to make a difference in the power, but I did notice it was leaning out at the end of the pull, so the high pressure pump might have been experiencing starvation.

We do know now, however, that raising the fuel rail pressure solves the fueling issues on upgraded turbos that require more fuel/RPM. I think it's public knowledge now that we are working with a company that made some ridiculous amount of power (over 500WHP if I recall) on the dyno (without any additional electronics and no throttle shutdown) using our fuel rail pressure tweaks, boost table mods, and wastegate table mods.

So, yes, it works, and solved the problem it was supposed to solve, but no it doesn't seem to have much use on stock turbo cars.
Old 04-15-2010, 01:11 PM
  #191  
Former Vendor
 
Matt M's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-03-08
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by VinceTrifecta
Well, I've had my car back at the dyno with it running at 2600psi (it's been running that much pressure since I made this original post), it didn't seem to make a difference in the power, but I did notice it was leaning out at the end of the pull, so the high pressure pump might have been experiencing starvation.

We do know now, however, that raising the fuel rail pressure solves the fueling issues on upgraded turbos that require more fuel/RPM. I think it's public knowledge now that we are working with a company that made some ridiculous amount of power (over 500WHP if I recall) on the dyno (without any additional electronics and no throttle shutdown) using our fuel rail pressure tweaks, boost table mods, and wastegate table mods.

So, yes, it works, and solved the problem it was supposed to solve, but no it doesn't seem to have much use on stock turbo cars.
We picked up a few HP on the stock turbo by raising fuel pressure, but that was with ported head and every mod possible, including open downpipe...and it was only a few hp.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hacadacalopolis
Parts
8
10-28-2015 06:09 PM
biniecki
Problems/Service/Maintenance
8
10-25-2015 02:23 PM
no_ss
Problems/Service/Maintenance
11
10-18-2015 11:58 PM
DocSvensk
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
7
09-27-2015 02:24 PM
Adiaz1ss
Problems/Service/Maintenance
4
09-26-2015 11:51 PM



Quick Reply: Trifecta gets it done: Fuel tables unlocked



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:13 AM.