2.9 and happy
#28
Yea the problem with that is you have to have a tune to go to 60lbs and you need a GOOD tune to do so, alot of motors go pop cause of bad tunes and 60's.... A 2.9 wont really be a hell of a lot worse then the 3.x you have with the stage 2, its not a huge difference in size, thing is the pulley spins easier making boost quicker being why you feel the increase.
Injectors on this car are effed up anyway, till you get a real good tune and 60s.
Injectors on this car are effed up anyway, till you get a real good tune and 60s.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-23-07
Location: Michigan
Posts: 14,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dont think that you need a bigger tensioner with a 2.9 and to the guy who has belt squeeking make sure you check your belt to make sure its on right
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-16-06
Location: Calgary Alberta
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
/sadface
#33
Premium Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: 08-21-06
Location: Western NY
Posts: 6,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Funny how people just passed by this info and didn't comment on it . I logged a 119% IDC on my stage 2 pulley with a tech 2 this summer. When i put the 2.99 on they went down to 94% ..... really weird .
#35
Senior Member
#36
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 09-02-05
Location: The East Coast
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Okay, I fixed the belt squeek. I had a rib off the lower pulley.
Got it aligned properly, and it hasnt made a noise since.
As for the tuning issue, that sucks. 60 lb'ers wernt originally in the cards for me.
I dont suppose tuning alone would solve the problem?
Got it aligned properly, and it hasnt made a noise since.
As for the tuning issue, that sucks. 60 lb'ers wernt originally in the cards for me.
I dont suppose tuning alone would solve the problem?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post