2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

42s or 60s with a 2.8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2007, 07:31 PM
  #26  
Rent me! per hour
 
Area47's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-22-07
Location: Still fixing others mistakes.
Posts: 24,185
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by CobaltWithMods
so if its 260whp what is that at the crank?
whp = wheel horse power.

please watch the a/f ratio. if you don't. you WILL lose the motor.
Old 08-17-2007, 12:54 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-05
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 12,485
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 60 Posts
Originally Posted by ridemlow03
well why dont you just simply keep your redline at 6500?? seems to me it would be safe if you ran at 6500 or is like harder to tune at 6500 redline???
Because the car keeps making power to 7000 rpms. Why stop before you have to?
Old 08-17-2007, 12:12 PM
  #28  
Junior Member
 
ridemlow03's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-24-07
Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah till it goes boom! if you have a 2.7 you will get through the rpms faster then a 2.8 so there for you wont be doing as much damage to the motor or supercharger. your not spinning the supercharger as much with a 2.7 and 6500 rpm then you would be with a 2.8 and 7000 so there for your running cooler iats and a safer engine. 2.7 and 6500 RL is 600 rpms less on the super charger then the 2.8 7000.
Old 08-17-2007, 01:41 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-05
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 12,485
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 60 Posts
Originally Posted by ridemlow03
yeah till it goes boom! if you have a 2.7 you will get through the rpms faster then a 2.8 so there for you wont be doing as much damage to the motor or supercharger. your not spinning the supercharger as much with a 2.7 and 6500 rpm then you would be with a 2.8 and 7000 so there for your running cooler iats and a safer engine. 2.7 and 6500 RL is 600 rpms less on the super charger then the 2.8 7000.
And, you still probably make less power. I doubt you will gain enough HP from that 0.1 of pulley size to make up for the difference in more rpms and higher shift points.
Old 08-17-2007, 02:12 PM
  #30  
Junior Member
 
ridemlow03's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-24-07
Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you very possibly could. your pushing colder air into the engine and more densed air. those 500rpms might not make that big of a difference. im not saying it will and im not saying it wont. but remember this you will be getting more torque earlier in the the rpms with a 2.7 then a 2.8 and torque is what really matters. torque is better for the strip rather then horsepower.
Old 08-17-2007, 02:18 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-05
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 12,485
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 60 Posts
Originally Posted by ridemlow03
you very possibly could. your pushing colder air into the engine and more densed air. those 500rpms might not make that big of a difference. im not saying it will and im not saying it wont. but remember this you will be getting more torque earlier in the the rpms with a 2.7 then a 2.8 and torque is what really matters. torque is better for the strip rather then horsepower.
Right, but 2 lb ft is not enough to overcome the difference of shift points for me. How much torque will you gain really? I shift at about 7100, so if I shifted at 6400 and dropped myself 500 rpms lower in the next gear, will that point, 500 rpms less with a 2.7, be making more torque and HP than the spot 500 rpms higher, but with a 2.8? I don't think it matters either way, I won't be using a smaller pulley and I don't own HPT so I can't retune the car yet. When I can, I'll see what works and go from there.
Old 08-17-2007, 02:56 PM
  #32  
Junior Member
 
ridemlow03's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-24-07
Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ItalianJoe1
Right, but 2 lb ft is not enough to overcome the difference of shift points for me. How much torque will you gain really? I shift at about 7100, so if I shifted at 6400 and dropped myself 500 rpms lower in the next gear, will that point, 500 rpms less with a 2.7, be making more torque and HP than the spot 500 rpms higher, but with a 2.8? I don't think it matters either way, I won't be using a smaller pulley and I don't own HPT so I can't retune the car yet. When I can, I'll see what works and go from there.
i guess the only way to really know which is better is by looking at dyno results to get a general idea of it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Supercharged06SS
Parts
20
10-05-2015 09:13 PM
SlowSaturn
Drivetrain
0
09-28-2015 11:03 AM
ChrisTutoki
Parts
0
09-24-2015 08:39 PM
Silverbullet333
New Members Check In!!
1
09-22-2015 10:55 AM
n20saturn
Parts
6
09-21-2015 01:50 AM



Quick Reply: 42s or 60s with a 2.8



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 PM.