All out m62 build update!
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: 11-06-06
Location: Pontypool, Ontario
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So this build is really good and all with good numbers, but I don't care what a 2.3L frankenstein LSJ can run on E85 I want to see a 2.0L LSJ on pump gas. Running these numbers wiht your set up doesn't put anyone on here to shame its pretty coolwhip what can be done if you dig in and throw tons of cash at your car to compensate for a poor power adder. Realistically it would be alot easier to run a turbo kit and or TVS to make similar numbers with pump gas and little to no downtime. I mean good job and all but to me this build doesn't mean ****, and im not a zzp hater i'd rather go twincharge then totally rip my motor apart jus throw the heaton on and run OKAY numbers for a built lsj
#29
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
So this build is really good and all with good numbers, but I don't care what a 2.3L frankenstein LSJ can run on E85 I want to see a 2.0L LSJ on pump gas. Running these numbers wiht your set up doesn't put anyone on here to shame its pretty coolwhip what can be done if you dig in and throw tons of cash at your car to compensate for a poor power adder. Realistically it would be alot easier to run a turbo kit and or TVS to make similar numbers with pump gas and little to no downtime. I mean good job and all but to me this build doesn't mean ****, and im not a zzp hater i'd rather go twincharge then totally rip my motor apart jus throw the heaton on and run OKAY numbers for a built lsj
Ryan on a 2.0 liter with stock head and stock cams made over 300WHP.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: 11-06-06
Location: Pontypool, Ontario
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah its a really cool build I just can't see many people running to you with cash for the shortblock. I think a better Idea would be to run all these mods while stayin 2.0 I mean you could showcase the cams better etc
#32
Premium Member
Theoretically wouldn't you be able to produce even more power with these upgrades with a more efficient power adder?
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: 11-06-06
Location: Pontypool, Ontario
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
for sure. I just mean anything they bolt on and show numbers with are going to be with the 2.3L on this project so if someone say wants to buy there cams they only know how much HP is possible if they had the ZZP shortblock. I'm sure ZZP we'll test these products on the regular 2.0lsj but it would have been cool to see them use all there products on a true 2.0L M62 car so we could really see how much there stuff would shine.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-08-05
Location: Niceville, FL
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Awesome new numbers and thanks for posting the graph with rpms and torque this time! This is the sort of stuff I like to see on here. Testing and tuning at its best.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-08-05
Location: Niceville, FL
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#41
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2-0l-lsj-performance-tech-47/zzp-all-out-m62-build-what-do-you-think-capable-184464/
Car is a 2.3L fully built stroker motor.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-03-06
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 7,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting. Mine only made 17 psi at 5300, and by 8200 rpm is was only at 14 psi. The blower couldn't keep up with my head/cams. Perhaps if I had gone with a less radical head/cam combo, I might have gotten better results with the M62. Good luck. You'll need a lot of it, and possibly some of Paul's voodoo magic.
#44
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Interesting. Mine only made 17 psi at 5300, and by 8200 rpm is was only at 14 psi. The blower couldn't keep up with my head/cams. Perhaps if I had gone with a less radical head/cam combo, I might have gotten better results with the M62. Good luck. You'll need a lot of it, and possibly some of Paul's voodoo magic.
#47
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 04-04-06
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We hit 320whp (conservative tune and pulley) and stopped there, I didnt want to push it to much further, new engine, so I stepped up to 110 and swapped the pulley to go further.
I want to get to the track soon, the trans is hating me for my 8000+rpm shifts, I swapped the fluid and I have been putting some miles on it and we will see if it loosens up a bit. On the scanner it was taking 1.2 seconds to shift 1-2 and 2-3, which doesnt seem like long, but let me tell you when your trying to race it seems like forever!
I want to get to the track soon, the trans is hating me for my 8000+rpm shifts, I swapped the fluid and I have been putting some miles on it and we will see if it loosens up a bit. On the scanner it was taking 1.2 seconds to shift 1-2 and 2-3, which doesnt seem like long, but let me tell you when your trying to race it seems like forever!
#49
Rent me! per hour
Join Date: 03-22-07
Location: Still fixing others mistakes.
Posts: 24,185
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
14 Posts
We hit 320whp (conservative tune and pulley) and stopped there, I didnt want to push it to much further, new engine, so I stepped up to 110 and swapped the pulley to go further.
I want to get to the track soon, the trans is hating me for my 8000+rpm shifts, I swapped the fluid and I have been putting some miles on it and we will see if it loosens up a bit. On the scanner it was taking 1.2 seconds to shift 1-2 and 2-3, which doesnt seem like long, but let me tell you when your trying to race it seems like forever!
I want to get to the track soon, the trans is hating me for my 8000+rpm shifts, I swapped the fluid and I have been putting some miles on it and we will see if it loosens up a bit. On the scanner it was taking 1.2 seconds to shift 1-2 and 2-3, which doesnt seem like long, but let me tell you when your trying to race it seems like forever!