2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Bwoody vs TTR vs CA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2008, 05:21 PM
  #1  
Super Moderator
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
07MetallicSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-29-06
Location: Land of Freedom
Posts: 23,408
Received 214 Likes on 173 Posts
Bwoody vs TTR vs CA

Originally on my cobalt I had a TTR motor mount, and CA trans mounts. This combination worked beautifully on the cobalt. I sold everything to get thru a jam, and now am in the process of building up slowly as it comes. I just noticed tho that I can get a full set of solid mounts for the balt from Bwoody for 260 bucks, vs 160 for TTR mount and then whatever CA costs. Thats not really what im thinking tho, im trying to find out if anyone has used the Bwoody setup in their balt and what were your thoughts, I know TTRs mount looks a HELL of a lot beefier. But I really havnt heard anything bad about bwoody on other parts.
Any and all feedback is appreciated. thanks
Old 11-03-2008, 05:24 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
eurochevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-14-06
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,623
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
my_bd with his TVs in the redline has the b-woody ones i believe..they're basically solid metal with a bushing at the top for the side engine mount haha his are like no movement at all..if i think you are talking the ones im thinking about
Old 11-03-2008, 05:42 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ebristol's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: WI
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I get into it with the RL guys all the time about the Bwoody Mounts VS the ZZP and TTR mounts. Its pretty easy to see that the ZZP and TTR Mounts are far superior in design over the Bwoody ones...

Bwoody


TTR and ZZP


The bwoody mounts are basically Motor mounts wrapped around tubes. You can actually see the engineering work that went into the ZZP and TTR mounts.

That was my setup and I had zero wheel hop.

Spam alert! lol I am selling my ZZP lower Trans mounts.

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/parts-66/fs-ttr-top-engine-mount-zzp-lower-trans-mounts-not-bwoody-140306/

You won't find a better deal on the intraweb.
Old 11-03-2008, 07:32 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
eurochevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-14-06
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,623
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
the ttr/zzp ones move a lot more on the left side engine mount..i was shown stock vs that vs b-woody before b-woody has a lot less freeplay
Old 11-03-2008, 11:02 PM
  #5  
Super Moderator
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
07MetallicSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-29-06
Location: Land of Freedom
Posts: 23,408
Received 214 Likes on 173 Posts
lol you have the exact setup I had. TTR and ZZP. by the way i pmed you on the ZZP mounts... I LOVED that set up. Your right, so much more engineering is quite apparent.
Old 11-04-2008, 12:53 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ebristol's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: WI
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by 07MetallicSC
lol you have the exact setup I had. TTR and ZZP. by the way i pmed you on the ZZP mounts... I LOVED that set up. Your right, so much more engineering is quite apparent.
Yeah it is nice.

TTR + ZZP > Bwuudy

I was looking for the post but someone on RLFs said that he has the Bwuudy mounts and STILL had wheel hop. But I don't remember who said it.

If I find it I will quote it in this thread.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TurboTechRacing
Supporting Vendor Deals & Group Purchases
11
10-27-2015 07:58 AM
MVP
General Cobalt
8
09-08-2007 09:55 AM
06 Redline
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
14
04-01-2007 03:57 PM
AROON02
Suspension
17
03-13-2007 12:23 PM
MVP
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
52
01-28-2007 05:20 PM



Quick Reply: Bwoody vs TTR vs CA



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:32 PM.