2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Disappointed on the Dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2007, 07:32 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
cobaltBlackss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-02-05
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Disappointed on the Dyno

Go ahead and say it, with out a good tune it's worthless. The guy tuning it was clueless on hptuners.I guess I'm going to have to drive somewhere to find an expert to tune my car.
243hp 240 tq

I'm sure there is a crap ton wrong wrong w/ my tune. I couldn't get stfts to drop, they just stayed at -50.




How do I upload a tune?

Last edited by cobaltBlackss; 12-07-2007 at 07:54 PM.
Old 12-07-2007, 07:36 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Witt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-03-06
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cobaltBlackss
I couldn't get stfts to drop, they just stayed at -50.
You were scanning too many STFT PIDs.
Old 12-08-2007, 01:30 AM
  #3  
Banned
 
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-07
Location: Az
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What the **** is wrong with the top end? Did he back off on the timing?
Old 12-08-2007, 01:34 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
lsjwannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-23-06
Location: on here
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
looks like you were running stupid rich up top did i see 8.0 afr? I told you it would not get that high on a mustang dyno though. Go to someone who knows what there doing and then re dyno you should probably get 260
Old 12-08-2007, 01:38 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
spaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-01-06
Location: Calgary,Canada
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What injectors are you running?
Old 12-08-2007, 01:44 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Sharkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-27-07
Location: Abbotsford BC, Canada
Posts: 5,687
Received 265 Likes on 224 Posts
from what i can tell, the a/f curve (line) in the first graph means nothing, the 2nd graph is the a/f ratio from the pull on the first graph.

looking at that a/f curve, id drive the thing nice till you get a tune, looks like it hit almost 13:1 at 5500rpm, that gonna melt some pistons.
Old 12-08-2007, 12:22 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
cobaltBlackss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-02-05
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lsjwannabe
Go to someone who knows what there doing and then re dyno you should probably get 260
I should probably get alot more than 260! Check my garage for mods
Old 12-08-2007, 12:38 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Greased's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-09-07
Location: minnesota
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol yeah you shouldnt be running at stage 2 number right now w/ your mods
Old 12-08-2007, 08:06 PM
  #9  
Moderator Alumni
 
zinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-26-04
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 4,944
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Remove ANY pids that have b2 or bank2 in the name from your scan pids.
Old 12-09-2007, 01:23 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
lsjwannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-23-06
Location: on here
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i know what you have man. A thing a few people are forgetting though is the car was dyno'd on a mustang dyno though 260 is alot. To many people base a lot off dyno numbers take it to the track once its retuned and see what kind of e.t and trap its running that will let you know where you stand. I have seen people dyno 230's on 2.5 pullied cars with every bolt on, i think the 2.8 pulley is holding you back and the tune.
Old 12-09-2007, 07:44 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
cobaltBlackss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-02-05
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^^ I don't think it waws an actual mustang dyno. It was a superflow dyno. If the guy would have just installed my widebandlike I asked him to I could have just copy and pasted afr error. But he didn't, I'm just gonna have to start from scratch again because that tune is worthless. I guess I'm going to have to save my money for a month and drive to Intense.
Old 12-09-2007, 10:59 PM
  #12  
New Member
 
sPeEdInGsS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-08-07
Location: york
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow i'd like like to see atleast 280whp with those mods
Old 12-09-2007, 11:09 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
an0malous's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-06
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,577
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
looks like it hit negative v-tec at 5500
Old 12-10-2007, 11:02 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
cobaltBlackss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-02-05
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by an0malous
looks like it hit negative v-tec at 5500
rofl
Old 12-10-2007, 11:06 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
chevysalesman614's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: new jersey
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Engine:
Ported head- Similar flow #'s to that of Drag cobalts
Cams- Crower regrind Intake 264 deg lift .417 /Exhaust 260 deg lift .408
Larger valves- Ferrea +1mm
Custom forged 10:1 Comp. ratio pistons- Diamond w/ both coatings
Custom forged rods- Eagle
Head studs- Eagle
Head Gasket- Cometic
Valve cover- 12 an outlet to reduce positive crank case pressure
Oil catch can
Ported blower
Pulley size-???
Injectors- Siemens 60#/hr
Water/meth-installed but not hooked up
Spark plugs- Ngk bkr7e gap .040
Intake-K'N CAI
Exhaust- 4-2-1 header, Magnaflow 2.5" catback
Coolant- Dual pass w/ resevoir, Cobra HE and stck HE

Drivetrain:
Clutch- Spec stage 3+
Flywheel- Fidanza light weight
Engine mounts- Turbo tech solid, Intense poly inserts
Control arm Bushings- Intense poly





damn, that sucks. like wannabe said though, go to the track and run it. you'll probably be pleasantly suprised when you run a 13.2 or something.
Old 12-10-2007, 11:08 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
an0malous's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-06
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,577
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
that would surprise me on that tune...
Old 12-10-2007, 11:30 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
cobaltBlackss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-02-05
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guys, honestly the tune is ****. I'm going to start from scratch and tune myself then take it an expert for WOT. Those #'s in now way reflect the car's poential. I was lean at 4000 rpm's so obviously I'm not going to make any power like that. It will be a little while longer, but cross your fingers for me. I need all the help I can get!
Old 12-10-2007, 11:36 AM
  #18  
Rent me! per hour
 
Area47's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-22-07
Location: Still fixing others mistakes.
Posts: 24,185
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts
lean is mean.

you can make power running lean. just depends on how you do it
Old 12-10-2007, 11:44 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
cobaltBlackss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-02-05
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Area47
lean is mean.

you can make power running lean. just depends on how you do it
it can also be too mean, like melting my pistons. But you're right, I want to keep it a little less than 12 once it's tuned properly
Old 12-10-2007, 12:00 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Blown 4-banger's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-03-06
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 7,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by an0malous
looks like it hit negative v-tec at 5500
LMFAO!!!! Peak power at 5500-6500 FTW!?!?

Originally Posted by cobaltBlackss
it can also be too mean, like melting my pistons. But you're right, I want to keep it a little less than 12 once it's tuned properly
It all depends on the amount of boost and heat. I fractured a piston (cast pistons break instead of melt) running an 11.7-11.8 AFR.... on 19 lbs of boost :shrug:

Last edited by Blown 4-banger; 12-10-2007 at 12:00 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 12-10-2007, 12:20 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
cobaltBlackss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-02-05
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did the same thing at 22lbs, but mine definitely looked melted. I don't want to push more than 16 or 17 lbs of boost because of the compression ratio.
Old 12-10-2007, 03:14 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
an0malous's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-06
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,577
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
has nothing to do with the amount of boost.
its what you were using to create that amount of boost.

an m62 eaton making 20psi or more, you might as well bolt in an oxy torch to your intake manifold.
Old 12-11-2007, 01:13 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
lsjwannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-23-06
Location: on here
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why are you only revving to 6500 when your car has cams?
Old 12-11-2007, 09:47 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
cobaltBlackss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-02-05
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm revving to 7000. I was going way lean on the dyno so there was no point in going all the way to 7.
Old 12-11-2007, 10:33 AM
  #25  
Rent me! per hour
 
Area47's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-22-07
Location: Still fixing others mistakes.
Posts: 24,185
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by cobaltBlackss
I'm revving to 7000. I was going way lean on the dyno so there was no point in going all the way to 7.
your definition of lean, and mine are obviously different.


Quick Reply: Disappointed on the Dyno



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:19 PM.