2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Enthusiasts and vendors alike... header testing inside!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-2009 | 11:41 PM
  #201  
Pickles's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-08-07
Posts: 1,641
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Originally Posted by Zach06CobaltSC
Some of us expected it and that's why were not running the JBP lol. However I never expected THAT much of a decrease from just a header.
Indeed. It's also alarming to know that someone buying this header not only loses tons of power, but limits there potential advance, or if they have already advanced, puts them at risk...
Old 08-08-2009 | 11:45 PM
  #202  
Zach06CobaltSC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-09-08
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
First one thing you need to remember is that his car is NO WHERE near stock lol. I would venture to guess that on a 100% stock car though wouldn't be much of a decrease if any, maybe even some possible gains, who knows. On a highly modified car, sure this shouldn't be ran but who knows. As far as the risk, I really don't think there is any RISK of running this header. If you are properly tuned for what you are running, there shouldn't be an issue.
Old 08-08-2009 | 11:49 PM
  #203  
Deathscythe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-28-06
Posts: 4,994
Likes: 0
From: Waldorf, MD
exactly. this header should not be run on a highly modified balt. It will probably not make a big deal on lesser powered cars, especially not someone that only wants the sound. But it hits a wall really fast, and if you're moving any serious airflow, then this will hinder your ability to make any kind of real power.
Old 08-08-2009 | 11:52 PM
  #204  
CobaltSS 16's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 07-01-07
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 29
From: NJ
wow that power decrease is insane, even with some timing dropped for obvious reasons.
Old 08-08-2009 | 11:53 PM
  #205  
Zach06CobaltSC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-09-08
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Whats the next header you are testing. I just switched to a Clear Image Automative header and downpipe setup and I am very curious as to what kinda power gains/loss's you will see.
Old 08-08-2009 | 11:54 PM
  #206  
Deathscythe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-28-06
Posts: 4,994
Likes: 0
From: Waldorf, MD
I'm going to be out for a few hours, but I'll get more info up when I get back.

the vibrant is next.
Old 08-08-2009 | 11:59 PM
  #207  
Pickles's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-08-07
Posts: 1,641
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Originally Posted by Zach06CobaltSC
First one thing you need to remember is that his car is NO WHERE near stock lol. I would venture to guess that on a 100% stock car though wouldn't be much of a decrease if any, maybe even some possible gains, who knows. On a highly modified car, sure this shouldn't be ran but who knows. As far as the risk, I really don't think there is any RISK of running this header. If you are properly tuned for what you are running, there shouldn't be an issue.
I guess what I was getting at, is that if someone had lightly tuned, lets say a 2.8, 60's, meth, and a comparable header/dp, and then decided they wanted to switch to this one believing the company that they would get similar performance, or more, and a mean sound, and didn't think the roll back timing after the swap...... You know what i'm sayin?
Old 08-09-2009 | 12:04 AM
  #208  
Zach06CobaltSC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-09-08
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Yes and No. I mean I don't think the header was the cause of a lot of the knock personally. I don't foresee someone else having 6 degrees of knock on a 2.8 60lbers and meth if they are tuned properly with this on.

But still in general, this IS a poorly designed header from the looks of it and the dyno doesn't lie generally lol.

Last edited by Zach06CobaltSC; 08-09-2009 at 12:04 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 08-09-2009 | 12:11 AM
  #209  
WickedSS2005's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 2
From: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
Actually, it is totally possible it IS the header causing the knock. I was able to go from 18* to 21*, no methanol, when I stept up to pacesetter header, full 3" exhaust. The restriction of the JBP spaghetti ball gave it garlic breath
Old 08-09-2009 | 12:21 AM
  #210  
freakta's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-07
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 0
From: milton ma
thats crazy
Old 08-09-2009 | 12:59 AM
  #211  
domin8_gt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-10-06
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
That's about a 16% decrease (doing the math in my head, so it's not exact).
Old 08-09-2009 | 01:40 AM
  #212  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
lol. cali buddies you seeing this?
Old 08-09-2009 | 01:45 AM
  #213  
WickedSS2005's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 2
From: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
cali ftw. a friend keeps asking me to move there. but I say screw CARB. So far we have stock header and JBP correct? (not reading every page up til now)
Old 08-09-2009 | 01:55 AM
  #214  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
i know 3 guys in socal alone that were running this header. 2 of which will be running tvs's. hopefully this opens some eyes!
Old 08-09-2009 | 01:57 AM
  #215  
Deathscythe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-28-06
Posts: 4,994
Likes: 0
From: Waldorf, MD
off the top, the header causes so many problems. The afr wasn't holding steady through any of the pulls i did yesterday. It kept changing during every pull we did today. The header has too many bends in it, and there are two different places where two different primaries are touching each other.
Old 08-09-2009 | 02:08 AM
  #216  
WickedSS2005's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 2
From: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
is the primaries touching..a problem? I'm thinking heat affecting flow
Old 08-09-2009 | 02:13 AM
  #217  
aterminatorz's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 07-16-08
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: USA
Next header please!
Old 08-09-2009 | 02:22 AM
  #218  
Deathscythe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-28-06
Posts: 4,994
Likes: 0
From: Waldorf, MD
[QUOTE=WickedSS2005;4198023]is the primaries touching..a problem? I'm thinking heat affecting flow[/QOUTE]

think harmonics. If you have frequencies that the ecm picks up as being a problem, the computer is going to take it as knock. There is an issue with the no.1 touching no.3 and no.4. It's going to cause knock and pull timing as a result. I had instances where the max timing was around 9 degrees.

The next one is going to be the vibrant. It's pissed me off already since I have to get a o2 sensor extension just to get the rear sensor to work.

Last edited by Deathscythe; 08-09-2009 at 02:22 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 08-09-2009 | 02:29 AM
  #219  
OriGinaL Condo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-27-08
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Linden, New Jersey
Can't wait for the results. I'm currently running the vibrant until i have enough power to warrant a full hahn exhaust
Old 08-09-2009 | 03:05 AM
  #220  
InfraRedline's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-22-08
Posts: 7,190
Likes: 6
From: Alpharetta, GA
I really wanna see the vibrant too! Even though I've cut out the cat.
Old 08-09-2009 | 05:32 AM
  #221  
Rippin07's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-22-07
Posts: 616
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
I call bull **** on the JBP test. Even giving you benefit of doubt that you have a shitty header where your primaries are touching, I have one and there is another one here, neither have primaries that touch. Second, your tune is F'ed up or you have an exhaust leak for your AFR's to be all whacked, I would have that checked out first. I put down more power and way more torque than what your claiming with less boost and on the M62 on both mustang and dyno jet dyno's, even for disparity between dynos around the country, no way are your numbers believeable, I dont think you have a solid tune at all since your meth problem.
I am not a JBP fan by any means, but I think the communities hate for them is fueling some of this. If you have a JBP header with touching primaries then you have a bad header, and I highly doubt touching primaries would affect the knock sensor that bad.

Out of curiousity, how much air flow are you moving through the MAF, you know, when you had the stock manifold or when you get the vibrant on.

Last edited by Rippin07; 08-09-2009 at 05:38 AM. Reason: just too damn unbelievable
Old 08-09-2009 | 05:57 AM
  #222  
WickedSS2005's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 2
From: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
Pretty touchy for not being a JBP fan. But fyi, their shitty rep was earned
Old 08-09-2009 | 09:02 AM
  #223  
Deathscythe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-28-06
Posts: 4,994
Likes: 0
From: Waldorf, MD
Originally Posted by Rippin07
I call bull **** on the JBP test. Even giving you benefit of doubt that you have a shitty header where your primaries are touching, I have one and there is another one here, neither have primaries that touch. Second, your tune is F'ed up or you have an exhaust leak for your AFR's to be all whacked, I would have that checked out first. I put down more power and way more torque than what your claiming with less boost and on the M62 on both mustang and dyno jet dyno's, even for disparity between dynos around the country, no way are your numbers believeable, I dont think you have a solid tune at all since your meth problem.
I am not a JBP fan by any means, but I think the communities hate for them is fueling some of this. If you have a JBP header with touching primaries then you have a bad header, and I highly doubt touching primaries would affect the knock sensor that bad.

Out of curiousity, how much air flow are you moving through the MAF, you know, when you had the stock manifold or when you get the vibrant on.

I was waiting for you to come. I am going to give you a chance to think about what you said. For one, I don't care if I had a bad header. Have some pride in your product and sell something that won't cause a problem. I bought mine along with about 30 other people during a group buy sometime last year.

Two, since you know so much, take the time to realize the differences between our two cars. I don't care how much you say you've done with yours, I can guarantee that you and I are doing two different things, and I am moving way more air than you. I will post my mods for you, since I don't think you took the time.

1. TVS- 1.32L air per cycle as opposed to the m62 moving 1.0L of air. Also, I am running over 22.3 psi max. That means I'm moving almost twice the air a stock one moves coming from a larger blower. So unless you have a tvs, I suggest you rethink your stance.

2. Ported head- The game is movement of airflow here. R.A.W. intake + ported head= more air being forced into the head. I also have forged pistons in there, so I can move up in boost if I so choose. The intake manifold is not a big restriction in my setup. I am more than capable to handle what the engine is sucking in.

3. Water-Methanol Injection- In place to keep supercharger temps down. Not really a major factor since we're talking about a header, but it is on the car.

Since you're so confident in the header, take a look at it yourself and think of what I'm going to say next.
Old 08-09-2009 | 02:45 PM
  #224  
Pickles's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-08-07
Posts: 1,641
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Originally Posted by JBP Website
With the best gains in the market, you are definatley getting what you pay for. In combination with our JBP Vortex exhaust and JBP Vortex intake, we've achieved an unpresidented full 31WHP gain! This is truly unbelivable and far exceeds our projected gains of 15-20WHP.
Ummm....... Unpresidented? Srsly?
Old 08-09-2009 | 02:57 PM
  #225  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
they meant loss not gain


Quick Reply: Enthusiasts and vendors alike... header testing inside!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15 PM.