Gt2560r
03-02-2008, 09:57 AM
#3
Senior Member
you can pay a little more for a t3/t4 and youll make alot better power...not to mention there is alot less involved with running a journal bearing turbo...and ball bearing doesnt make that big of a difference
03-02-2008, 03:10 PM
#7
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: 06-11-07
Location: Az
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03-02-2008, 03:14 PM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-19-07
Location: Ft. Benning, GA / Charlotte
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03-03-2008, 01:58 AM
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-08-05
Location: Niceville, FL
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Precision SC50
Garrett GT2871R
MHI EVO III 16G
03-03-2008, 02:01 AM
#10
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: 06-11-07
Location: Az
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just a few off the top of my head. The Garrett and the Mitsubishi turbo will spool faster. My Integra with it's 1.8 liters of fury spools the 16G fully by 3500rpms and the turbo will support those power numbers you want. I got my real MHI EVO III 16G brand new from turbochargers.com for $510 shipped!
Precision SC50
Garrett GT2871R
MHI EVO III 16G
Precision SC50
Garrett GT2871R
MHI EVO III 16G
Last edited by Onyxd04Redline; 03-03-2008 at 02:01 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
03-03-2008, 03:03 PM
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-20-06
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 5,450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03-03-2008, 03:16 PM
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-18-05
Location: Canada eh!
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IIRC my SBR T3/T04E 50 trim is made by Precision turbo and is the same as the SC50. It spools pretty quick. 15-16psi by 3500-3800rpm. It works way better then before on 18psi on the SC.
03-03-2008, 03:29 PM
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-20-06
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 5,450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03-03-2008, 03:31 PM
#21
Senior Member
yes, its dam close to that at that given psi but i'm on a larger frame turbo (SC6031RS) thus moving more air, with more lag tho.
not much, the early re-build with ceramic BB's and the higher RPM balance helped out as well. the manifold swap made the single largest difference.
not much, the early re-build with ceramic BB's and the higher RPM balance helped out as well. the manifold swap made the single largest difference.
03-03-2008, 03:35 PM
#23
Senior Member
not.
stuck with the A/W unit.
different cores, but still the same.
i have an external A/W core ready to go once the KFI-intake manifold is completed here shortly.
you just cant beat an air to water set up, they'll absorb a dam good amount of heat.
stuck with the A/W unit.
different cores, but still the same.
i have an external A/W core ready to go once the KFI-intake manifold is completed here shortly.
you just cant beat an air to water set up, they'll absorb a dam good amount of heat.
03-03-2008, 03:36 PM
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-20-06
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 5,450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes, its dam close to that at that given psi but i'm on a larger frame turbo (SC6031RS) thus moving more air, with more lag tho.
not much, the early re-build with ceramic BB's and the higher RPM balance helped out as well. the manifold swap made the single largest difference.
not much, the early re-build with ceramic BB's and the higher RPM balance helped out as well. the manifold swap made the single largest difference.
03-03-2008, 03:42 PM
#25
Senior Member