2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

High flow intake manifold***picking off where rebel stopped**

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2009, 04:53 PM
  #451  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
SCcobaltSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-28-06
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I liked the idea of keeping it water-air because I was going to get this with my twincharge setup to be twin cooled, but now its just single if I get this manifold, then I will have to go even larger FMIC than what probably comes with the kit... Might just get fabricate a quad single pass with the stock manifold. Depending on the air flow numbers this produces over stock.
Old 09-02-2009, 04:58 PM
  #452  
Jn2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Jn2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-07
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,791
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ebristol
Interesting twist in the project...
lol yes it is, fisrt thing we got asked is how we fit all that piping in the engine bay hahahaha...will update with pics later tonight or tommorow morning
Old 09-02-2009, 05:00 PM
  #453  
Senior Member
 
slowswap's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-25-08
Location: Depew, NY
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well this was a fail. I notion to lock this thread.
Old 09-02-2009, 05:00 PM
  #454  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ebristol's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: WI
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Jn2
yeah, i mean this isnt the first time air2air has been tried on a sc...anyone remember the older 3800sc t-bird?

Last edited by ebristol; 09-02-2009 at 09:25 PM.
Old 09-02-2009, 07:14 PM
  #455  
Senior Member
 
qwikredline's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-03-08
Location: Port Perry Ontario
Posts: 3,454
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
agreed lock the fail thread, this did not pick up where Rebel stopped AT ALL.
Old 09-02-2009, 07:39 PM
  #456  
Senior Member
 
spike's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-01-06
Location: IN
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Turbos r looking better & better
Old 09-02-2009, 07:40 PM
  #457  
Jn2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Jn2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-07
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,791
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by spike
Turbos r looking better & better
or single pass on the stock manifold, which is what i believe to be the cheapest route...zzp got 365whp out of the m62 :p so turbos arent looking that much bettter
Old 09-02-2009, 07:43 PM
  #458  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
HunterKiller89's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-20-06
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
no longer interested in this
lack of water-air = waste of time following this thread
Old 09-02-2009, 07:53 PM
  #459  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
freakta's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-22-07
Location: milton ma
Posts: 5,578
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
air to air works great... dont know why everyone is against it
Old 09-02-2009, 08:02 PM
  #460  
Jn2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Jn2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-07
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,791
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by HunterKiller89
no longer interested in this
lack of water-air = waste of time following this thread
sorry to hear that, i suggest unsubscribing from this thread if it now offends you in any way or form
Old 09-02-2009, 08:10 PM
  #461  
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-08
Location: The 405
Posts: 37,073
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by SCcobaltSS
Intersting.... So instead of buying just a manifold that has a built in water-air intercooler we have to buy an air-air intercooler, piping, fittings, along with the high flow manifold, scrap the heat exchanger, scrap the pump? Hopefully the cooling efficiency difference is worth it.
i'ld say even for 10* cooler it's definitely worth it. you don't have the weight of the coolant, heat exchanger, or intake manifold. you don't have to worry about pump failure or leaks. much much easier for a direct nitrous or methanol setup or to add in 4 more fuel injectors. i'ld say going air to air is way worth it
Old 09-02-2009, 08:14 PM
  #462  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
HunterKiller89's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-20-06
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Jn2
sorry to hear that, i suggest unsubscribing from this thread if it now offends you in any way or form
lol. it doesnt offend me, but i was very excited to see a improved air-water manifold. after following it for so long, only to see that its not going to happen, its a big let down. im sure you can understand.
Old 09-02-2009, 08:17 PM
  #463  
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-08
Location: The 405
Posts: 37,073
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i don't see what you guys are so worried about. you don't think an air to air cooling setup will be enough for a roots style blower, when the same principal works to cool turbochargers that get glowing red hot, sping 10 times faster than any blower, and are powered by exhaust gas?
Old 09-02-2009, 08:20 PM
  #464  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-05
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 12,485
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 60 Posts
Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921
i don't see what you guys are so worried about. you don't think an air to air cooling setup will be enough for a roots style blower, when the same principal works to cool turbochargers that get glowing red hot, sping 10 times faster than any blower, and are powered by exhaust gas?
The compressor side of a turbo doesn't get red hot. What does shaft speed have to do with any of it? Same question for exhaust powering?

The issue here is more of "why go air-air over liquid-air", as opposed to "air-air won't be good".
Old 09-02-2009, 08:24 PM
  #465  
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-08
Location: The 405
Posts: 37,073
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
shafter speed=friction(yes, what little there is actually does effect it). i know its not the compressor side that gets hot. but you can't try to tell me that the compressor side isn't feeling quite a bit of heat from the, coinsidentally named "hot" side. why do you think they have the heat shield on them? to keep the heat from spreading into the engine bay and protect the compressor side.

and why go air to air as opposed to staying water to air?? would YOU like to redesign a whole cooling system? i sure wouldn't.

Last edited by EXsoccer1921; 09-02-2009 at 08:24 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 09-02-2009, 08:38 PM
  #466  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
freakta's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-22-07
Location: milton ma
Posts: 5,578
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i dont think its soo much a redesign as a room to put all the extra stuff
Old 09-02-2009, 08:50 PM
  #467  
Senior Member
 
thought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-12-06
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well, i'd be interested to see what the tradeoff is in extra coolant from my option b tank to completely removing the extra capacity - heatsoak
Old 09-02-2009, 09:36 PM
  #468  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ebristol's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: WI
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921
i don't see what you guys are so worried about. you don't think an air to air cooling setup will be enough for a roots style blower, when the same principal works to cool turbochargers that get glowing red hot, sping 10 times faster than any blower, and are powered by exhaust gas?
This is probably something you and all the other air to air people will never figure out. The water-air laminova setup on the LSJ is far more efficient that air-air setups used in most turbo charged cars.

Charged air from a turbo is no where near the temp created by superchargers. That is just the cold hard truth.
Old 09-02-2009, 09:39 PM
  #469  
Senior Member
 
qwikredline's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-03-08
Location: Port Perry Ontario
Posts: 3,454
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ebristol
This is probably something you and all the other air to air people will never figure out. The water-air laminova setup on the LSJ is far more efficient that air-air setups used in most turbo charged cars.

Charged air from a turbo is no where near the temp created by superchargers. That is just the cold hard truth.
hot hard truth?
Old 09-02-2009, 09:40 PM
  #470  
Senior Member
 
leviticus88's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-22-06
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jn2
yeah we decided to go air/air, couldnt make a better water/air system...we coudlnt get a core to meet the size restrcition of the manifold, and than we tried to make one of our own...that one took many man hrs to make, in the end it would of made the cost of production manifolds way to expensive....

Sad, I was only interested in a Water to Air setup. No way an air to air will keep up with a 2.7-2.6 pullied m62...
Old 09-02-2009, 09:45 PM
  #471  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
domin8_gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-10-06
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ebristol
This is probably something you and all the other air to air people will never figure out. The water-air laminova setup on the LSJ is far more efficient that air-air setups used in most turbo charged cars.

Charged air from a turbo is no where near the temp created by superchargers. That is just the cold hard truth.
Isn't that why some people will spray nitrous or some other cooler onto the intercooler.

I like the idea of air-air. If it so bad then why is ZZP using it on the twincharge setup? I know some people don't like them, but their results speak for themself. 465whp is good enough for me to think air-air is good.

Last edited by domin8_gt; 09-02-2009 at 09:45 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 09-02-2009, 09:48 PM
  #472  
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-08
Location: The 405
Posts: 37,073
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i never said air to air was more efficient that water to air all of the time. but in this situation and the intake manifold being made/redesigned. i would have to say that switching to air/air is the better move.
Old 09-02-2009, 09:53 PM
  #473  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
domin8_gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-10-06
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921
i never said air to air was more efficient that water to air all of the time. but in this situation and the intake manifold being made/redesigned. i would have to say that switching to air/air is the better move.
QFT!
Old 09-02-2009, 10:03 PM
  #474  
Member
 
paul1588's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-13-08
Location: West Allis , WI
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
zzp uses both the stock im with the lamnova cores and also a air to air front mount just an fyi domin8 gt
Old 09-02-2009, 10:17 PM
  #475  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
domin8_gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-10-06
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are correct. The air-air the air from the turbo to the inlet of the supercharger which is then compressed by the s/c and cooled by the air-water in the oe im.


Quick Reply: High flow intake manifold***picking off where rebel stopped**



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:24 PM.