Hockeyman

iTrader: (4)

Can do.

After 1 week, I managed to go 160 miles on 12 gallons of ethanol. I didn't realize that during the install we also did the lead foot mod. She's running great and a blast to drive now. Can't wait to race it this weekend

383_Stroker

iTrader: (3)

New parts always come with the lead foot mod

Tjolley

Wow 13 mpg..

U should settle around 22-25 mpg if the tune is dialed.

U have a ls4 tb on??

usafcobalt

I agree that mileage sucks ass. Hah and I was mad when I dropped to 26. The heavy foot probably has a lot to do with that tho

Tjolley

E98 is a even better feeling..lol
E98 + NOS = **** UR PANTS TOP END FOR SOME REASON.

jonathan923

iTrader: (2)

so any final dyno numbers or updated vids?

kissmy05ss

Nice setup, hockeyman. Let us know how you did at the bash.

Hockeyman

iTrader: (4)

Running stock TB. It gets 18-20mpg on E now, drove it a couple hundred miles on the highway over the weekend.

Hockeyman

iTrader: (4)

She ran great! Best run was my first run, 13.6 in the quarter. Getting no traction and wheel hop in 1st gear now. 60ft was 2.4 which shows lots of room for improvement. My best trap was 109mph. I believe I was the only m62 LSJ in the 13s at the bash

Hockeyman

iTrader: (4)

I have a vid of my 13.6 pass, will upload it soon!

usafcobalt

Nice! There's plenty of room for improvement. You get her to hook up it will be dangerous

Area47

needs my timing map in it

Hockeyman

iTrader: (4)

I took one look at it and nearly shat my pants...firstly because of win, secondly because of oh ****.

JapEatr

iTrader: (9)

i was scared to flash it on his

i plan on running it very shortly

Area47

i make power.

which map? obviously not the tvs one. the "discretion" map is for drag only. the "josh" map is for an e85 m62 car.

JapEatr

iTrader: (9)

i showed him the full of win and he about fell outta the chair

can i "all the time" the discretion one with built motor :EVIL:

Area47

im sure you could, but i wouldn't advise it. look at the map i ran in mine vs that one. the peak timing at peak torque and peak hp are different. this is just for usable power differences and rod bearing life.

JapEatr

iTrader: (9)

i thought your file and the "win" file were the same timing map. it was late when i looked at it, sorry if it got lost in translation

armcclure

iTrader: (2)

As I've seen you say before, is a few extra hp worth short rod bearing life?
I plan to run a fairly tame timing map on my new motor. There will already be more power than is readily usable on the street. No sense in pushing it too hard.

Tjolley

Hardened bearings is all Im gone say.

JapEatr

iTrader: (9)

OE is better

Tjolley

Clevite bearings.
I have 30,000 miles on my built engine.. I ran it on e85 with 34* of timing up top for 20k racing it every weekend.

JapEatr

iTrader: (9)

bryan - just looked at it again, and the slopes are the same but a few degrees from each other. nevermind my earlier confusion

Hockeyman

iTrader: (4)

time for racecar action

Area47

lol fail!
how many miles are on these bearings?



slopes are the same, but the final numbers are not. i stopped at 27 i think on my personal one due to the minuscule gains above this. .5-1 whp isn't worth torquing the bearings. that "win" timing map was created for someone who wanted a big track number.
it worked.