Official Turbo LSJ thread!!!
08-12-2013 | 12:20 AM
#6476
08-12-2013 | 01:03 AM
#6477
So for an engine where the only time it sees boost is when it's making a pass down the track...Vented like the Civics and Supras or sealed with a return to the intake? I've noticed some of the vented setups are vented and returned, check valves in place then? Would it be on the lines from Engine->Can or the return Can->Engine line?
This is an interesting thread.
Oil catch can set up - pic request - EK9.org JDM EK9 Honda Civic Type R Forum
This is an interesting thread.
Oil catch can set up - pic request - EK9.org JDM EK9 Honda Civic Type R Forum
08-12-2013 | 10:37 PM
#6479
Question. I have stg2 turbo cams and only put down 461whp and 383wtq. Im seeing guys with stock cams put down much more tq and bouy the same whp. Whats with that? Im thinking of switching back to stock cams. What do you guys think. Keep stg 2 cams? Why? Or go back to stock cams? Why? Thank ya fellas.
08-13-2013 | 04:06 AM
#6480
In one months time you went from there is no fresh air to there is fresh air.
On the 9th of July... (ttr manifold thread)
On the 10th of August... (this thread)
So you either learned something in 30 days and are acting like you had it all figured out since racing the Time Attack according to how you addressed MRB. OR you, like most on the forum, dont like to admit you were WRONG.
On the 9th of July... (ttr manifold thread)
lol. the LNF system has a different system with a different rocker cover. The rocker cover on the LSJ is similar but has no fresh air intake. and only one route for the rocker cover vent. At 25 psi, I am guessing you are developing considerable blow by, how much i dont know. And if you have a filtered rocker cover cap, then its all meaningless from a vacuum point of view. LSJ's like to pop dipsticks, thats an indication of compressing in the base of the motor- blow by.
so agree or disagree:
the pcv system is used to consume crankcase vapors in the combustion process instead of venting them to the atmosphere. Fresh air from the intake system is supplied to the crankcase mixed with blow by gases and then passed through a calibrated orifice into the intake manifold.
Thw primary control is through the pcv orifice which meters the flow depending on inlet vacuum. The pcv orifice is an integral part of the rocker cover.
if abnormal operating conditions occur, the system is designed to allow excessive amounts of blow by gases to backflow through the crankcase vent into the intake system to be consumed by normal combustion.
The moment you significantly change your engine the requirements will change. If you change the orifice sizes in the PCV system then the system wont function as designed. The best you can say if you mod your car and it runs well, is that it runs well.
the pcv system is used to consume crankcase vapors in the combustion process instead of venting them to the atmosphere. Fresh air from the intake system is supplied to the crankcase mixed with blow by gases and then passed through a calibrated orifice into the intake manifold.
Thw primary control is through the pcv orifice which meters the flow depending on inlet vacuum. The pcv orifice is an integral part of the rocker cover.
if abnormal operating conditions occur, the system is designed to allow excessive amounts of blow by gases to backflow through the crankcase vent into the intake system to be consumed by normal combustion.
The moment you significantly change your engine the requirements will change. If you change the orifice sizes in the PCV system then the system wont function as designed. The best you can say if you mod your car and it runs well, is that it runs well.
So you either learned something in 30 days and are acting like you had it all figured out since racing the Time Attack according to how you addressed MRB. OR you, like most on the forum, dont like to admit you were WRONG.
08-13-2013 | 04:24 AM
#6481
Question. I have stg2 turbo cams and only put down 461whp and 383wtq. Im seeing guys with stock cams put down much more tq and bouy the same whp. Whats with that? Im thinking of switching back to stock cams. What do you guys think. Keep stg 2 cams? Why? Or go back to stock cams? Why? Thank ya fellas.
Now with that said, you did put up 461whp on only 21 psi of boost. It took me 26 psi to do that. At 21 psi my car was only making 410whp and 395wtq. So if you look at it from that stand point you gave up 10wtq for 50whp. Good trade off. I know our turbos, mods, head flow, exhaust, etc. are all different and its apples to oranges but I am trying to give some perspective. Dont change anything, get more fuel, more maf, and turn the boost up. You wont care about those cams or the numbers...
08-13-2013 | 05:38 AM
#6482
Yeah. I do shift at 7800 tho so I pull all the way thru. I have the fuel now. I swapped in a dw300 fuel pump and ID1000s. Im still maxxing my maf tho and I cant get around it. Max freq is 12.5k and im nailing that bitch hard. No one has a mini afc I can use. Tim at zzp said they dont work and he doesnt have any ATM. And im being told two diff things that you can and you can't extend the maf scale. Idk which it is.
A few guys I know running turbo 3800s blocked off half of the inlet on there maf to make it see less air and compensated with fuel accordingly so its seeing less air and demanding less fuel but they had to richen it up across the tables to make it idle and drive correctly.
I read that bumping too the larger maf tubes you lose drivibility and I DD my car so I cant be having that
A few guys I know running turbo 3800s blocked off half of the inlet on there maf to make it see less air and compensated with fuel accordingly so its seeing less air and demanding less fuel but they had to richen it up across the tables to make it idle and drive correctly.
I read that bumping too the larger maf tubes you lose drivibility and I DD my car so I cant be having that
08-13-2013 | 10:20 AM
#6483
In one months time you went from there is no fresh air to there is fresh air.
On the 9th of July... (ttr manifold thread)
On the 10th of August... (this thread)
So you either learned something in 30 days and are acting like you had it all figured out since racing the Time Attack according to how you addressed MRB. OR you, like most on the forum, dont like to admit you were WRONG.
On the 9th of July... (ttr manifold thread)
On the 10th of August... (this thread)
So you either learned something in 30 days and are acting like you had it all figured out since racing the Time Attack according to how you addressed MRB. OR you, like most on the forum, dont like to admit you were WRONG.Meant . JUST I DIDN'T EXPLAIN IT WELL. sorry that you are so arrogant you want to dissect every word. Which is why I quoted The WORKSHOP MANUAL FOR DESCRIPTION OF THE PCV S
SYSTEM. You said that statement may or not be true OH WELL
08-13-2013 | 11:51 AM
#6488
08-13-2013 | 01:02 PM
#6491
And ill set mine up to flush the blowby gasses out instead of just venting.
Last edited by armcclure; 08-13-2013 at 02:15 PM.
08-13-2013 | 02:34 PM
#6494
your the dude on the rl forums that's k04 crazy
Last edited by mrbelvedere; 08-13-2013 at 02:34 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
08-13-2013 | 02:35 PM
#6495
08-13-2013 | 06:50 PM
#6499
Just to be a db I would argue that point. The 60 and 70's rocker covers DID NOT have PCV pathways with oil seperator biscuits mounted in a mezannine built into the top of the rocker cover. etc.
08-13-2013 | 07:23 PM
#6500