Official TVS Thread!!!
02-27-2013, 10:48 AM
#4629
tim was the person who stopped the process of putting a tvs on his car and as for making money from it they most definitely would have I was told by a person at zzp at the c.e.d. meet last year the reason why they do not do much supercharger development is the fact they didn't want to hurt their turbo sales
Last edited by mrbelvedere; 02-27-2013 at 10:50 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
02-27-2013, 10:54 AM
#4631
keep thinking that your wrong
tim was the person who stopped the process of putting a tvs on his car and as for making money from it they most definitely would have I was told by a person at zzp at the c.e.d. meet last year the reason why they do not do supercharger development is the fact they didn't want to hurt their turbo sales
tim was the person who stopped the process of putting a tvs on his car and as for making money from it they most definitely would have I was told by a person at zzp at the c.e.d. meet last year the reason why they do not do supercharger development is the fact they didn't want to hurt their turbo sales
But you confirmed my point with the second part of your post. "Why advertise the accomplishments of another companies product when it would hurt your own sales?"
I assumed that most people understood that if OTTP was selling more TVSs that would mean that ZZP would be selling less Turbo kits...
Next time I will spell it all out to avoid confusion.
02-27-2013, 10:56 AM
#4632
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
But you confirmed my point with the second part of your post. "Why advertise the accomplishments of another companies product when it would hurt your own sales?"
I assumed that most people understood that if OTTP was selling more TVSs that would mean that ZZP would be selling less Turbo kits...
Next time I will spell it all out to avoid confusion.
But you confirmed my point with the second part of your post. "Why advertise the accomplishments of another companies product when it would hurt your own sales?"
I assumed that most people understood that if OTTP was selling more TVSs that would mean that ZZP would be selling less Turbo kits...
Next time I will spell it all out to avoid confusion.
02-27-2013, 11:19 AM
#4636
I only drove the car twice since the install, but I love them!!
I haven't had a chance to log much, but my butt dyno is very happy.
I felt an increase in power throughout the rev range.
They come on very strong around 6.5k rpm and keep pulling. Lots of fun
I plan on taking the car for a spin this Saturday. I want to see how much more they flow (MAF lbs/min wise) vs. the stockers.
I haven't had a chance to log much, but my butt dyno is very happy.
I felt an increase in power throughout the rev range.
They come on very strong around 6.5k rpm and keep pulling. Lots of fun
I plan on taking the car for a spin this Saturday. I want to see how much more they flow (MAF lbs/min wise) vs. the stockers.
02-27-2013, 11:26 AM
#4638
lmao
they should be all in well before then
I only drove the car twice since the install, but I love them!!
I haven't had a chance to log much, but my butt dyno is very happy.
I felt an increase in power throughout the rev range.
They come on very strong around 6.5k rpm and keep pulling. Lots of fun
I plan on taking the car for a spin this Saturday. I want to see how much more they flow (MAF lbs/min wise) vs. the stockers.
I haven't had a chance to log much, but my butt dyno is very happy.
I felt an increase in power throughout the rev range.
They come on very strong around 6.5k rpm and keep pulling. Lots of fun
I plan on taking the car for a spin this Saturday. I want to see how much more they flow (MAF lbs/min wise) vs. the stockers.
Last edited by mrbelvedere; 02-27-2013 at 11:26 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
02-27-2013, 11:32 AM
#4639
The car revs very quick.
I glanced at the tack when I felt the swell in power.
The tack was at/around 6.5k when I glanced, but power probably came on well before that.
Again, I will log and get accurate results once spring time comes. My comments are all based on the increased power I felt. No data yet other than checking for knock & fuel trims (all checked out great).
I glanced at the tack when I felt the swell in power.
The tack was at/around 6.5k when I glanced, but power probably came on well before that.
Again, I will log and get accurate results once spring time comes. My comments are all based on the increased power I felt. No data yet other than checking for knock & fuel trims (all checked out great).
Last edited by Staged07SS; 02-27-2013 at 11:39 AM.
02-27-2013, 12:01 PM
#4645
The only one I have on record is 374 whp, so in that case Japeatr is nipping at your toes
I say pick up a cheap LSJ, and bring us back to 2007-2010 when you were making leaps and bounds with your TVS car. I miss those days.
My midrange felt pretty stout as did my low end.
I'll need to try a "40 roll", and see how she moves out in 2nd gear, lol.
02-27-2013, 12:09 PM
#4646
02-27-2013, 12:11 PM
#4647
U never posted your "400 hp" dyno for your SS/SC Bryan....
The only one I have on record is 374 whp, so in that case Japeatr is nipping at your toes
I say pick up a cheap LSJ, and bring us back to 2007-2010 when you were making leaps and bounds with your TVS car. I miss those days.
My midrange felt pretty stout as did my low end.
I'll need to try a "40 roll", and see how she moves out in 2nd gear, lol.
The only one I have on record is 374 whp, so in that case Japeatr is nipping at your toes
I say pick up a cheap LSJ, and bring us back to 2007-2010 when you were making leaps and bounds with your TVS car. I miss those days.
My midrange felt pretty stout as did my low end.
I'll need to try a "40 roll", and see how she moves out in 2nd gear, lol.
jk.
