2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Problems with 2.9 Pulley.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2008, 11:06 PM
  #26  
Fail Less.
iTrader: (3)
 
Bika's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-08-05
Location: Brookfield
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
np
Old 06-09-2008, 11:14 PM
  #27  
Banned
 
Mss26's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-17-08
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sput
Hey guys, I found this post that contains a formula for converting the injector pulsewidth into IDC. This should be useful for those with the interceptor and wanting to figure out IDC's.

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/show...dth#post644739

Hey it works too... it matches the HPT log above...

Pulse Width = 20, RPM = 6900... and 20 * 6900 = 138,000 and then 138,000 divided by 1200 = 115% just like the log says Man it's been a while since i actually learned something from this forum lol.
Old 06-10-2008, 09:00 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
schamsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-02-07
Location: LaCrosse, WI
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LOL I've got ALL these people saying "you'll max out your injectors" but not one person saying. I have blown #4, or I over revved the charger, or some other thing to that effect... So I'm gunna go ahead and buy it and maybe I'll be the first to actually break something, cause it does look like anyone else has.
Old 06-10-2008, 03:11 PM
  #29  
Fail Less.
iTrader: (3)
 
Bika's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-08-05
Location: Brookfield
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
people have. you wouldnt be the first. run it hard for long enough you will see that heat + lean = boom.

also people tend to forget that shoving more air into an engine with JUST a smaller pulley isnt the best way to get more power.
Old 06-10-2008, 07:31 PM
  #30  
Member
 
Connor05's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-20-07
Location: Bayonne, New Jersey
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ive been running a 2.9 with stage 2 tune for a while now and i live at sea level. My car runs just as good as it did when i got it brand new.
Old 06-10-2008, 07:33 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
hungryhip-ccp's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-31-07
Location: SoCal, Lancaster
Posts: 4,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SlowBalt_06
alot depends on where you live
ding ding ding you have the CORRECT answer...
Old 06-10-2008, 08:16 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
sput's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-07
Location: MN
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I tested out my 2.9 today and my injectors were running at 100% or higher over 6750 rpm. Now obviously this is not normal operating conditions so running a 2.9 for daily driving in my car is just fine.

I've concluded, however, that since I do occasionally take it to the track and run up to 6800 rpm or higher that I'm going to use a bigger pulley that I have instead. I think in the long run my engine will last longer.

This is a good thread. I learned quite a bit from it. Thanks cobaltss.net
Old 06-10-2008, 08:17 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-05-07
Location: cincinnati
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
subscribed. i have a 2.9 now... thinking about a 3 inch now
Old 06-10-2008, 08:25 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
hungryhip-ccp's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-31-07
Location: SoCal, Lancaster
Posts: 4,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
check out this thread if your curious about heat&pulley sizing

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2-0l-lsj-performance-tech-47/2-8-42s-dyno-results-113169/
Old 06-10-2008, 08:37 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
OntarioBalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-18-07
Location: Windsor, Ontario
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
watch for a **** load of 2.9's is the classified section soon...lol
Old 06-10-2008, 08:40 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
hungryhip-ccp's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-31-07
Location: SoCal, Lancaster
Posts: 4,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sput
I tested out my 2.9 today and my injectors were running at 100% or higher over 6750 rpm. Now obviously this is not normal operating conditions so running a 2.9 for daily driving in my car is just fine.

I've concluded, however, that since I do occasionally take it to the track and run up to 6800 rpm or higher that I'm going to use a bigger pulley that I have instead. I think in the long run my engine will last longer.

This is a good thread. I learned quite a bit from it. Thanks cobaltss.net


for daily driving i would much rather use stage 2 pulley vs 2.9 as 2.9 will create more unwanted drag and cause worse mpg

Last edited by hungryhip-ccp; 06-10-2008 at 09:11 PM.
Old 06-10-2008, 08:44 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
sput's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-07
Location: MN
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes I just meant the injectors would be ok with it. I switched to a 3inch pulley already.
Old 06-11-2008, 12:34 AM
  #38  
Premium Member
iTrader: (3)
 
rukkee's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-21-06
Location: Western NY
Posts: 6,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hahah this is funny , i just took my stage 3 pulley off for the summer (heat) . To the person who said there is no differnece between stg2 and 3 pulley ,needs to ride in my car . You notice it down in lower rpm ranges , there is a difference . I went with the 2.99 because of IDC's , i didn't feel good about running a true 2.9 without a tune. In the GM stage 3 instructions they say it is fine to run the pulley on the stage 2 tune.
Old 06-11-2008, 01:54 AM
  #39  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
hungryhip-ccp's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-31-07
Location: SoCal, Lancaster
Posts: 4,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rukkee
Hahah this is funny , i just took my stage 3 pulley off for the summer (heat) . To the person who said there is no differnece between stg2 and 3 pulley ,needs to ride in my car . You notice it down in lower rpm ranges , there is a difference . I went with the 2.99 because of IDC's , i didn't feel good about running a true 2.9 without a tune. In the GM stage 3 instructions they say it is fine to run the pulley on the stage 2 tune.


yeah i know what you mean... almost like the a/c is on but not as bad... this is why i run just reg old stage 2 pulley during summer... and if you have supporting mods its not like the car isnt quick anymore, why waste the gas and put the extra un-needed rpm's on the blower internals... save pulley for the track or weekend racing...
Old 06-11-2008, 08:20 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
schamsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-02-07
Location: LaCrosse, WI
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, since I already got the money to my paypal account, I'm gunna go ahead and have Nate custom make me a 2.95, well see how that works out. Otherwise big deal it was only $50. Least I'm supporting a vendor.

Old 06-11-2008, 10:58 AM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
LopsidedJester's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-13-06
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think if you have a lot of supporting mods allowing for extra airflow then a 2.9" becomes a little too small, a 2.95" sounds like a good idea if you're going to try and max out your stage 2 tune without getting too unsafe. i'm sure a 2.9" will be fine as well, from what i see it isn't causing any severe problems, car is still running great and a bit stronger than stage 2 pulley.

I finally got hptuners and started logging and i see 120% idc at 7200 rpm, starts maxxing injectors at 6k (calibration is still a little off, i ask for 11.4, it gives me 10.8 afr). but, by the time i hit redline i'm seeing 12.2 afr and see almost 4 degrees of kr, it scares me that i've been running this setup for almost a year with less cooling mods than i have now.
Old 06-11-2008, 11:28 AM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
SmOKe JeNsOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-07
Location: Amarillo,TX
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gonna check mine with a tech 2 in the shop I'm at approx. 4000 ft. I'll get back with you guys with results
Old 06-11-2008, 01:08 PM
  #43  
Fail Less.
iTrader: (3)
 
Bika's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-08-05
Location: Brookfield
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i said there was no difference between an aftermarket 3.0" pulley and stage 3.
stage 2 = 3.06"
stage 3 = 2.99"
almost 1 psi difference. still not a whole hell of alot, but potentially noticeable
Old 06-11-2008, 01:30 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
schamsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-02-07
Location: LaCrosse, WI
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am 40 ft above sea level. 2.95 should be nice.
Old 06-11-2008, 01:33 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
Psykostevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-06
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,911
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Mss26
this useless post has been brought to you in part by.... a typical cobaltss member

does anyone have solid information like logs from hpt that show a 2.9 is not good on stage 2? i'm tired of seeing these posts and people saying "yes" or "no" without backing it up.
We try posting graphs and stuff for you guys, but then all of you claim you can't read them, so then I have to go into Microsoft Paint, and draw diagrams all over the freaking things like its MaddenVision!
Old 06-11-2008, 01:35 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
hatrickstu's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-05
Location: Ar-kan-sas
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lsjwannabe owning more nesayers, who would have guessed?
Old 06-11-2008, 01:52 PM
  #47  
Banned
 
Mss26's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-17-08
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Psykostevo
We try posting graphs and stuff for you guys, but then all of you claim you can't read them, so then I have to go into Microsoft Paint, and draw diagrams all over the freaking things like its MaddenVision!
well put me down in the "can read graphs" column i make useless graphs and charts all day for my bosses... and lol at MaddenVision
Old 06-14-2008, 07:52 PM
  #48  
New Member
 
SSmoke1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-14-08
Location: Amarillo
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok after hooking up the Tech 2 to my car oh this is Smoke Jenson BTW
here is what I have found dont know if this sounds right or not

PW-1.79ms @6k rpm
boost duty cycle- 99%DC
Knock retard 0%
air/fuel 14.7

What does this mean for you guys that know more about this then me? 2.90 stage 2
Old 06-14-2008, 11:28 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
NexTnmE's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-23-07
Location: Central CT
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, you will 'most likely' over max your injectors. Depending on where you are, ambient temps, mods...

I am at about 110% right now. The tech that tuned me asked that particuluar question. "Do you have a smaller pulley?"

If you wanna beat the **** out of your car, it's probably not the best idea to run 42's...its 'safe' because you wont blow up your car, immediately...
Old 06-15-2008, 01:06 AM
  #50  
Fail Less.
iTrader: (3)
 
Bika's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-08-05
Location: Brookfield
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SSmoke1
Ok after hooking up the Tech 2 to my car oh this is Smoke Jenson BTW
here is what I have found dont know if this sounds right or not

PW-1.79ms @6k rpm
boost duty cycle- 99%DC
Knock retard 0%
air/fuel 14.7

What does this mean for you guys that know more about this then me? 2.90 stage 2
doesnt tell me much. the injector pw and duty cycle says that you have maxed out your injectors before 6000 rpm. either you arent getting any knock, or the tech2 just isnt reading any.
god help you if your air/fuel is 14.7 at full throttle... but i think that is referring to idle.


Quick Reply: Problems with 2.9 Pulley.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 PM.