Rebel Auto Worxs Twin Screw tuning session and Video
#76
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: new jersey
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks.
this one is 100cfm bigger, and more effecient.. i'm liking this over the turbo.. at least for my needs. i just wanna run high 12s off the bottle, and low 12s on it.
plus the driveability and low end torque of the ss s/c are why i bought it. i imagine the characteristics of the car would stay closer to stock if i went the twin screw route
yup i think there is another vendor crying about this right now
you will probably have to spring for an upgraded clutch and axles.. plus drag radials would be a very good idea.
this one is 100cfm bigger, and more effecient.. i'm liking this over the turbo.. at least for my needs. i just wanna run high 12s off the bottle, and low 12s on it.
plus the driveability and low end torque of the ss s/c are why i bought it. i imagine the characteristics of the car would stay closer to stock if i went the twin screw route
Ok, so in the end, we can run this new blower without upgrading the internals and not worry about it, correct? Eventually I'll up the intenals regardless, but once I buy this, and the suspension/drive upgraes to hndle th new power, I'll be low for a bit on the money. Sorry to soundlike a puss, but the car is my daily driver a well as my toy, and I'm still paying on it, so hopefully you guys can understand my wanting to be sure of this.
Last edited by chevysalesman614; 07-24-2007 at 07:32 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#77
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-29-05
Location: Goodfellow AFB, TX
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks.
this one is 100cfm bigger, and more effecient.. i'm liking this over the turbo.. at least for my needs. i just wanna run high 12s off the bottle, and low 12s on it.
plus the driveability and low end torque of the ss s/c are why i bought it. i imagine the characteristics of the car would stay closer to stock if i went the twin screw route
yup i think there is another vendor crying about this right now
you will probably have to spring for an upgraded clutch and axles.. plus drag radials would be a very good idea.
this one is 100cfm bigger, and more effecient.. i'm liking this over the turbo.. at least for my needs. i just wanna run high 12s off the bottle, and low 12s on it.
plus the driveability and low end torque of the ss s/c are why i bought it. i imagine the characteristics of the car would stay closer to stock if i went the twin screw route
yup i think there is another vendor crying about this right now
you will probably have to spring for an upgraded clutch and axles.. plus drag radials would be a very good idea.
Yeah, hence the part about upgrading the suspension/drive part...no way in hell the stockers will hold up to this, but good to know the motor will.
#78
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 03-21-07
Location: Rebel Land
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Clutch For sure axles should be fine if your not a track goer with sticky tires it would get ugly.
Like i said excellent upgrade over stock blower and a blast to drive!
This car will run 12's.. with some tires
Like i said excellent upgrade over stock blower and a blast to drive!
This car will run 12's.. with some tires
#79
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: new jersey
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BriDoc614@yahoo.com - write that down. i want to know when i can buy this.
Last edited by chevysalesman614; 07-24-2007 at 07:42 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#80
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 01-23-06
Location: on here
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well When we first started the Car on the 2.8inch and 60lb injector tune. we drove the car home the first night with No tuning Just no wide open runs.
Tuning is no harder than using the stock blower setup.
In terms of Pistons I suggest going stock compression or slightly less to avoid timing and tuning issues.
Tuning is no harder than using the stock blower setup.
In terms of Pistons I suggest going stock compression or slightly less to avoid timing and tuning issues.
#82
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-27-07
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMO, once you get done tuning, run up to 7k and use a nice exhaust the numbers might actually be a little more suprising than what you've mentioned in this thread. It's better to stay on the conservative side before it happens but you made those numbers on very conservative timing at a lower than stock redline.
#83
WOW.... that is awsome, great work guys! When will we see some WOT fly bys??
Also, I thought this was Tag's project, are you guys taking over it? or working together?? sorry just a little confussed....maybe I missed something.... Also do you know when we will have a price on this complete kit??
Thanks, and great work guys!!!
Also, I thought this was Tag's project, are you guys taking over it? or working together?? sorry just a little confussed....maybe I missed something.... Also do you know when we will have a price on this complete kit??
Thanks, and great work guys!!!
#84
Senior Member
So was this done on a bone stock car or what. IIRC it just had an intake and that was all? Yah if that was done with a 2.9" pulley and you made 281 imagine what it would make with a 2.5" then 300whp should be a piece of cake, with upgrade pistons, and full bolt ons(I/H/E) and a tune 350whp shouldnt be problem.
#87
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: new jersey
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So was this done on a bone stock car or what. IIRC it just had an intake and that was all? Yah if that was done with a 2.9" pulley and you made 281 imagine what it would make with a 2.5" then 300whp should be a piece of cake, with upgrade pistons, and full bolt ons(I/H/E) and a tune 350whp shouldnt be problem.
we have nothing better to do than sit on this forum
Last edited by chevysalesman614; 07-24-2007 at 07:53 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#90
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 03-21-07
Location: Rebel Land
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes there are 72lb injectors out there that are direct drop in. I believe Rc engineering still sells them. The 60lb injectors will be fine for most.
Thanks for the quick calculation area47.
Thanks for the quick calculation area47.
#94
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: new jersey
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
or he took the project and finished it for them?
Last edited by chevysalesman614; 07-24-2007 at 08:20 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#96
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-11-05
Location: Yonkers NY
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thats wat i gathered.. bc its the same exact thing.. same machined parts and connectors and what not... but obviously not TAG
#97
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: new jersey
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
either way, i would like to know how long it will take for mine to come in the mail
i'd like to keep my Cobalt SS Supercharged, supercharged, instead of going turbo. then i might even put my badges back on
i'd like to keep my Cobalt SS Supercharged, supercharged, instead of going turbo. then i might even put my badges back on
#100
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-03-06
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 7,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only problem with this kit, using that charger in MY position is RPM. The 1200AX has a max rpm of like 14000 rpm, which is a 3" pulley with a 7k rev limiter. However it would be like a 3.5" pulley with my 8100 rpm limit. For normal guys it looks like a GREAT kit