2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

safe set-up?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-2008, 06:50 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
MSHETZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-25-07
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question safe set-up?

would this be a safe set-up, injen cai, ca 2.79 pulley, 60lb injectors , corsa catback, and wit a zzp pcm ?
Old 06-04-2008, 06:51 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-08
Location: The 405
Posts: 37,073
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
depends what the zzp pcm is tuned for, other than that sounds good.

your best bet however would be to leave the pcm out and have a dyno tune done once all that is installed
Old 06-04-2008, 07:12 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
MSHETZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-25-07
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok thanx ....

zzp says its basically a stage 2 wit 20 tweaks .... they told me i would def need a header/dp to run that setup ... not correct?

Last edited by MSHETZ; 06-04-2008 at 07:12 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 06-04-2008, 07:14 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
hungryhip-ccp's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-31-07
Location: SoCal, Lancaster
Posts: 4,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MSHETZ
ok thanx ....

zzp says its basically a stage 2 wit 20 tweaks .... they told me i would def need a header/dp to run that setup ... not correct?
you would deff benifit from those thing greatly. . .
Old 06-04-2008, 07:18 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
kenhebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-06
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Without a front mounted heat exchanger to help negate the extra heat caused by the supercharger turning more rpms than it was originally designed to deal with due to the smaller pulley, this set-up will be useless and dangerous. Your intake air temperatures will be extremely high and will rob you of a lot of power. I would also highly suggest a dyno tune as opposed to buying a PCM. You will get a much better set-up from a dyno tune than a tune in the mail. Trust me
Old 06-04-2008, 07:20 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
bobby71189's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-20-07
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hungryhip-ccp
you would deff benifit from those thing greatly. . .
im running a 2.8 and 60#'s with a stock exhaust with a highflow muffler and no resonator. my car runs fine but its really restricted. i got a dc sports catback n im just waitin on gettin a midlength header n downpipe which is really gonna open this thing up.
Old 06-04-2008, 07:20 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
MSHETZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-25-07
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok....2.9 pulley would be better to start off wit?
Old 06-04-2008, 07:38 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
kenhebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-06
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Even with a 2.9 you need a front mounted heat exchanger along with the 60's and a tune. I was running the 2.9 on the GM stage 2 tune and when I dynoed it, I dynoed at 190hp because it was running very lean and very hot. Coolant was shooting out of the overflow tube from then stock heat exchanger and that was after just one run. You can run a 2.9, but you need a front mounted heat exchanger, 60's and a tune.
Old 06-04-2008, 07:42 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
MSHETZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-25-07
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how can many others run the 2.9 wit just the stage 2 setup without problems? i believe you but just wondering?
Old 06-04-2008, 08:10 PM
  #10  
Member
 
C0baltWithM0ds's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-18-08
Location: pennsylvania
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kenhebe
Even with a 2.9 you need a front mounted heat exchanger along with the 60's and a tune. I was running the 2.9 on the GM stage 2 tune and when I dynoed it, I dynoed at 190hp because it was running very lean and very hot. Coolant was shooting out of the overflow tube from then stock heat exchanger and that was after just one run. You can run a 2.9, but you need a front mounted heat exchanger, 60's and a tune.
its good to have 60's with a 2.9 but i mean on gm stage kit a 2.9 will run fine on 42's if thats all you plan on goin so you dont really need 60s on a gm stage setup with a 2.9
Old 06-04-2008, 08:51 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
chevysssc's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-12-07
Location: new jersey
Posts: 2,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i got a 2.9 on 42s running great
Old 06-04-2008, 09:00 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
bigrroberto's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-30-06
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kenhebe
Even with a 2.9 you need a front mounted heat exchanger along with the 60's and a tune. I was running the 2.9 on the GM stage 2 tune and when I dynoed it, I dynoed at 190hp because it was running very lean and very hot. Coolant was shooting out of the overflow tube from then stock heat exchanger and that was after just one run. You can run a 2.9, but you need a front mounted heat exchanger, 60's and a tune.
im running 2.8 with 60 intake, exhaust and NO problems with heat. You dont NEED a heat exchangeer, but if you want to take full advantage of the parts with an agressive tune then its recommended.
Old 06-04-2008, 09:03 PM
  #13  
Member
 
C0baltWithM0ds's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-18-08
Location: pennsylvania
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bigrroberto
im running 2.8 with 60 intake, exhaust and NO problems with heat. You dont NEED a heat exchangeer, but if you want to take full advantage of the parts with an agressive tune then its recommended.
um under any circumstance having a h/e is one of the most precious things you can have
Old 06-04-2008, 09:05 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
bigrroberto's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-30-06
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by C0baltWithM0ds
um under any circumstance having a h/e is one of the most precious things you can have
of course anything that will help reduce heat is great, but if your temps arent getting up to a dangerous level then there's really no point. waste of money
Old 06-04-2008, 09:06 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
MSHETZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-25-07
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanx for all feedback but many mixed reviews .... i want to be safe until i get a h/e and/or header/dp... so 2.9 wit 42s or 2.79 wit 60s wit a zzp pcm(basically a stage 2 tune tweaked)?
Old 06-04-2008, 09:14 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
07 SS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-11-07
Location: Bourbonnais IL
Posts: 4,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MSHETZ
thanx for all feedback but many mixed reviews .... i want to be safe until i get a h/e and/or header/dp... so 2.9 wit 42s or 2.79 wit 60s wit a zzp pcm(basically a stage 2 tune tweaked)?
Why not 2.9 with 60's and then you have room to drop pullies if you desire? And you dont HAVE to have a heat exchanger and 60's to run a 2.9. Is it smart? Yes? Do you HAVE to have them, No!.
Old 06-05-2008, 09:01 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
kenhebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-06
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 07 SS/SC
Why not 2.9 with 60's and then you have room to drop pullies if you desire? And you dont HAVE to have a heat exchanger and 60's to run a 2.9. Is it smart? Yes? Do you HAVE to have them, No!.

My dyno and, air fuel ratios, spark plugs, and the fact that my car pulled a massive amount of timing out says otherwise.
Old 06-05-2008, 09:42 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
07 SS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-11-07
Location: Bourbonnais IL
Posts: 4,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kenhebe
My dyno and, air fuel ratios, spark plugs, and the fact that my car pulled a massive amount of timing out says otherwise.
Good for your car, mine runs great along with about 99% of the others who run a 2.9 on 42lbers.
Old 06-05-2008, 09:44 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
hungryhip-ccp's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-31-07
Location: SoCal, Lancaster
Posts: 4,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MSHETZ
thanx for all feedback but many mixed reviews .... i want to be safe until i get a h/e and/or header/dp... so 2.9 wit 42s or 2.79 wit 60s wit a zzp pcm(basically a stage 2 tune tweaked)?

hey you might wanna check out my thread if your going with a zzp tune...


https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2-0l-lsj-performance-tech-47/2-8-42s-dyno-results-113169/
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rduncanss06
New Members Check In!!
0
09-27-2015 11:17 PM
TylerJHowell
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
34
09-21-2015 06:47 PM
ATOMbomb
Suspension
9
09-11-2015 10:48 AM
Macgyver2484
Parts
2
09-02-2015 05:44 PM



Quick Reply: safe set-up?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:19 PM.