2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Stage 2 with 2.85 pulley base dyno run done today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-10-2007, 03:57 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
sscobaltscZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-07-07
Location: Norcal east bay area
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stage 2 with 2.85 pulley base dyno run done today

oops...this topic got posted twice so this is the thread staying open...

Ok..before any further comments about why the numbers are so low....

The Stage 2 GM tune and 42 lb injectors do not work with the 2.85 pulley in our case according to the dyno numbers and readings! We already knew it might not be right and numbers would suffer as components arent matched perfectly. Once we get the 60 lb injectors and a correct tune with correct fuel maps and timing curves for boost levels we will expect better #'s.

Initial base dyno run this morning to see where everything stood with the new 2.85 pulley with GM Stage 2 tune and 42 lb injectors. Dyno sea level at 83 degrees with 24% humidity. Only needed to do one run to 6700 as hp was already peaked and didnt need to go to rev limiter 7K.

IDC (injector duty cycle), hit 92% at 5600, 95% at 6000 and 117% at 6700 rpms. TOO MUCH!

AFR way too lean starting out around 14.65 and dropping down to 12.80 from 4200-6700 but still way too lean.

The timing curves for available boost levels were way off and were actually hovering around the low octane input lines in hptuners and were not where they needed to be and was pulling out a total of 8-10 degress timing through the whole pull pretty much from 4500-6700.

Definatly need and will get 60 lb injectors and a good tune changing fuel and timing curves and a whole ton of other adjustments as needed which should yield another 30+whp.




Last edited by sscobaltscZ06; 08-10-2007 at 09:12 PM.
Old 08-10-2007, 04:06 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
rallyracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-09-04
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 9,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your Hp and TQ numbers are kinda low for stage2 kit plus your other mods.
Old 08-10-2007, 04:08 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
sscobaltscZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-07-07
Location: Norcal east bay area
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes the hp/tq is low cause the S2 tune sucks with the 2.85 pulley and injectors not keeping up. We already knew the 42 lb injectors would not work with the 2.85 pulley and s2 tune so its no surprise the hp # was low and IDC was way over max %.
Old 08-10-2007, 04:10 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Shortbus's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-25-06
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now will people listen about the idc.
Old 08-10-2007, 04:14 PM
  #5  
Moderator Alumni
 
zinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-26-04
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 4,944
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Shortbus
Now will people listen about the idc.

I won't. Basically because I have data that contradicts this data
Old 08-10-2007, 04:15 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Kaisoboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-20-06
Location: Calgary, AB Canada
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking Dyno numbers

Originally Posted by sscobaltscZ06
Kinda low cause the S2 tune sucks with the 2.85 pulley and injectors not keeping up.
Is that Dyno loaded simulating road friction.? If you look at my sig I had 219 whp and 198 wtq on a mustang dyno. The only thing that was not in my mods at the time of run was the 2.85 pully and tune. It was a relatively warm day with low humidity at 3500 ft SL. This equates to a Dyno jet dyno at about 250 whp. Your numbers seam low. Just curious.

Cheers
Old 08-10-2007, 04:29 PM
  #7  
Rent me! per hour
 
Area47's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-22-07
Location: Still fixing others mistakes.
Posts: 24,185
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by zinner
I won't. Basically because I have data that contradicts this data
same here.

42's
2.8
85% duty cycle at 7200.

another car i did. 42's. 2.85 86% duty cycle at 7k.

find someone who knows what they are doing. no two injectors are the same, neither are two cars. people really should keep this in mind.
Old 08-10-2007, 04:33 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Kaisoboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-20-06
Location: Calgary, AB Canada
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With my 2.85 and mods at 3500 ft SL my IDC are at 85% at WOT 7000 rpm. So I agree, every area and car is different.
Old 08-10-2007, 04:36 PM
  #9  
Member
Thread Starter
 
sscobaltscZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-07-07
Location: Norcal east bay area
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've seen a dozen cars with IDC's of over 100% at 6500 with a 2.80-2.85 from a dozen different areas and elevations around the USA and I've seen a dozen more that seemed to be just fine as well.

Lots of variables for sure but im sure not gonna travel around the state looking for a dozen different dynos to take an average from... I could care less what other cars get for their IDC's as im only concerned with this one. Theres no magic in getting a correct IDC reading.

Its no big deal and only costs around $300 with the harness required to go get some 60 lb injectors and throw em in and tune it.
Old 08-10-2007, 04:42 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Shortbus's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-25-06
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zinner
I won't. Basically because I have data that contradicts this data
Care to share.
Old 08-10-2007, 04:49 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Rodimus_Prime's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-02-06
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well im at 137% on stock injectors on a totally stock car running to 7k in hp tuners

when i get stage 2 id like to see what it does on the stage 2 pulley first
Old 08-10-2007, 04:49 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Kaisoboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-20-06
Location: Calgary, AB Canada
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool Easy

Originally Posted by sscobaltscZ06
I've seen a dozen cars with IDC's of over 100% at 6500 with a 2.80-2.85 from a dozen different areas and elevations around the USA and I've seen a dozen more that seemed to be just fine as well most if not all which were elevations of 3000 or higher.

Lots of variables for sure but im sure not gonna travel around the state looking for a dozen different dynos to take an average from... I could care less what other cars get for their IDC's as im only concerned with this one.
That is a pretty **** pour attitude. You posted your results and we graciously replied back with our findings and posted so you have some basis to look at and I do agree that one persons IDC will not be the same as another and no one expects you to travel the states looking for dynos to take an average. If you don't want imput then don't post.

Have a nice day.
Old 08-10-2007, 05:04 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Rodimus_Prime's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-02-06
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its a pretty well known fact that 42lbers dont run 2.8 pulleys its more of a commonality than a rarity that it doesnt work

For every one person that posts thier findings that it does work theres prob 10 that dont work
Old 08-10-2007, 05:10 PM
  #14  
Rent me! per hour
 
Area47's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-22-07
Location: Still fixing others mistakes.
Posts: 24,185
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Rodimus_Prime
its a pretty well known fact that 42lbers dont run 2.8 pulleys its more of a commonality than a rarity that it doesnt work

For every one person that posts thier findings that it does work theres prob 10 that dont work
IF you have the right supporting mods. yes, you can do it.

most people don't have the ability to figure out what it needs first.
Old 08-10-2007, 05:11 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
BriantheLion26's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-08-06
Location: Duncannon, PA
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd like a log of mine sometime to see how mine runs with the gm stage 2 (updated flash if it makes a difference) and a 2.9"
Old 08-10-2007, 05:14 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
cobaltstg2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-14-06
Location: Indiana, Fort Wayne
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zinner
I won't. Basically because I have data that contradicts this data
same here .. although 60s is the better route just more expenseive i put down 247 hp and 231 on just the stage2 tune and the 2.8 pulley with stock exhaust on a mustang dyno
Old 08-10-2007, 09:17 PM
  #17  
Member
Thread Starter
 
sscobaltscZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-07-07
Location: Norcal east bay area
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kaisoboy
That is a pretty **** pour attitude. You posted your results and we graciously replied back with our findings and posted so you have some basis to look at and I do agree that one persons IDC will not be the same as another and no one expects you to travel the states looking for dynos to take an average. If you don't want imput then don't post.

Have a nice day.
Oh, im sorry you think my attitude was **** poor in my comments back. I wasnt arguing or trying to give attitude, only commenting every dyno operator will get different results for tons of different reasons. I never said one was right and one was wrong. Ive been to 3 dynos in the past all within 3 miles of my house. Took the same car (not the Cobalt) to each of them in a 2 hour period and results varied greatly.

I ordered hptuners this afternoon as it wasnt as expensive as I thought it was gonna be and will start learning it myself as we have 4 race cars I can use it on once I begin learning it, then I can only blame myself for numbers that dont look right instead of wondering if my dyno operator is doing everything correctly.

Anyway, I always have a nice day.....
Old 08-10-2007, 09:24 PM
  #18  
Doc
Senior Member
 
Doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-11-05
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Posts: 9,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sscobaltscZ06
I ordered hptuners this afternoon ....
how did you get the measurements for IDC..??
why didn't you let the car go until 7k rpm..??
where in cali are you..??
Old 08-10-2007, 09:36 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
FryLoch's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-18-07
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rodimus_Prime
well im at 137% on stock injectors on a totally stock car running to 7k in hp tuners

when i get stage 2 id like to see what it does on the stage 2 pulley first
That made me laugh!!! Awesome dude!
Old 08-10-2007, 10:12 PM
  #20  
Member
Thread Starter
 
sscobaltscZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-07-07
Location: Norcal east bay area
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didnt need to go to 7k to find out the numbers we were wanting/needing to see. Hp had peaked at 6350 and started to drop off then anyway so there was no need to go further than that. He asked me if I wanted to make a run to 7K and I said no need to and he agreed. In San Francisco east bay area. I dont know how he calculated or what inputs he had in hptuners to calculate the idc's. Im investigating though as I know know there are several ways to do it after going through hptuners forums and seeing a couple threads on here as well by tuners.
Old 08-10-2007, 10:16 PM
  #21  
Doc
Senior Member
 
Doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-11-05
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Posts: 9,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
makes sense...try this link
Old 08-10-2007, 10:23 PM
  #22  
New Member
 
Ryan07SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: Florida
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dynoed 247 whp on a dyno jet with your same setup with 42 lbs injectors and a 2.85 pulley and gm stg 2 tune . . The car runs strong !
Old 08-11-2007, 02:50 AM
  #23  
Banned
 
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-07
Location: Az
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I made more on stock boost. This just reaffirms the saying that more boost isn't always better.

Last edited by Onyxd04Redline; 08-11-2007 at 03:06 AM.
Old 08-11-2007, 03:10 AM
  #24  
New Member
 
Anemic Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-11-07
Location: El Dorado Hills, CA
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keep in mind, gentlemen, A dyno should only be used for tracking your own improvements, And that is if you stick with the same dyno every time. one dyno comparison to another may yield a 20hp difference, but the cars are exactly the same! So don't feel bad your dyno numbers aren't as great as other peoples. Get your car tuned to the best it can by that dyno, then take it to a track to see its real potential, and post up some times!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
brickloaf
Show & Shine
56
06-18-2019 12:51 PM
insylem
General Cobalt
45
10-01-2016 08:34 PM
Spanky's Monkey
Parts
37
03-07-2016 06:06 PM
no_ss
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
18
09-18-2015 11:03 AM
medic710
New Members Check In!!
1
09-06-2015 08:53 PM



Quick Reply: Stage 2 with 2.85 pulley base dyno run done today



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 AM.