Stage 2 + 2.90 Pulley
09-08-2007, 03:44 PM
#51
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-03-07
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
09-08-2007, 04:54 PM
#52
New Member
Join Date: 05-10-06
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
are u shitting me? stock pistons can hold way more than that.. its the boost that blows out our piston rings...
and the work was talking about the symantics of the supercharger...
but kk have fun yall.. i didnt come on this thread to get flamed...
ask cameron.. he knows all about blow'n pistons.
and i bet ur going to tell me my transmission cant hold it too huh?
i got 250whp. on a jet dyno with gmstg2 maping and other upgrades.... so dont tell me its possible. ur forgetting the 320CC METH KIT SHOT. u guys are used to the gm maping or the cobaltaddiction maping. go buy some hp tuners and **** with it...
and the work was talking about the symantics of the supercharger...
but kk have fun yall.. i didnt come on this thread to get flamed...
ask cameron.. he knows all about blow'n pistons.
and i bet ur going to tell me my transmission cant hold it too huh?
WOW I CALL BS on Hurt-ya! Our stock internals will barely hold 300-350! So NO I don't think so go somewhere else with that!
But yes JKEN it is completly possible Stangkilr is running 13.7 with nuthing but Stg.2, 2.85, and a tune! YES THAT IS IT! (albiet he is a damn good driver!)
But yeah, I would like to get out to the track myself, I just got my header, d/p, and full exhaust done so I would like to see how it goes.
But before my exhaust I dyno'd 242 whp and 213 wtq (it was 100* and 98% hummidity)
And that was just intake, S2, 2.85, tune!
But yes JKEN it is completly possible Stangkilr is running 13.7 with nuthing but Stg.2, 2.85, and a tune! YES THAT IS IT! (albiet he is a damn good driver!)
But yeah, I would like to get out to the track myself, I just got my header, d/p, and full exhaust done so I would like to see how it goes.
But before my exhaust I dyno'd 242 whp and 213 wtq (it was 100* and 98% hummidity)
And that was just intake, S2, 2.85, tune!
Last edited by Hurt-ya; 09-08-2007 at 04:54 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
09-11-2007, 04:03 AM
#57
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-03-07
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
09-11-2007, 05:00 AM
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-02-06
Location: Harker Heights, TX
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Boost bypass is *BAD* *BAD* *BAD*!!! Never say those words again! All it takes is a little change with HPT to remove the boost limit. The boost bypass Quote Works Unquote by disabling an essentual safty feature of your supercharger. Don't do it. It doesn't even work about half the time for people are trying to get out of it.
09-11-2007, 06:12 AM
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: 12-19-05
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 9,704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I ran an intake, S2, and 2.85 on my 42's and ran just fine (with some HPTuners help)
No you don't need 60's, Area47 is running a 2.8 on 42s with meth.... so it's possible to run 2.8-" pullies without the need for larger injectors.
Get a "GOOD" tune and a meth kit and you'll be fine.
No you don't need 60's, Area47 is running a 2.8 on 42s with meth.... so it's possible to run 2.8-" pullies without the need for larger injectors.
Get a "GOOD" tune and a meth kit and you'll be fine.
09-11-2007, 07:04 AM
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-26-06
Location: Marlton, NJ
Posts: 9,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
09-11-2007, 07:10 AM
#63
Member
Join Date: 05-07-07
Location: Norcal east bay area
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm still busting up laughing at some drunkerds comment he has 400 whp. The I saw he was from Texas...Lotta bullsh** in Texas....
09-11-2007, 07:13 AM
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-26-06
Location: Marlton, NJ
Posts: 9,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would have to agree about the 400whp comments too. What kind of math are some of these peoples using? I need my local bank to learn that math.
09-11-2007, 08:18 AM
#65
Member
Join Date: 05-07-07
Location: Norcal east bay area
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
09-11-2007, 11:29 AM
#66
Senior Member
Boost bypass is *BAD* *BAD* *BAD*!!! Never say those words again! All it takes is a little change with HPT to remove the boost limit. The boost bypass Quote Works Unquote by disabling an essentual safty feature of your supercharger. Don't do it. It doesn't even work about half the time for people are trying to get out of it.
09-12-2007, 12:30 PM
#67
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-03-07
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I also noticed that the stock tune bleeds boost, but with the GM stage 2 tune the boost appears not to bleed (minus TQ MGMT of course... but that can be disabled easy enough). I noticed this looking at the tunes in HPT. So if you have the GM stage 2 tune you do not need to do any kind of changes to get full boost as far as I can tell.
09-12-2007, 04:04 PM
#68
Senior Member
Yeah, on the stock tune if you throw on a smaller pulley it will bleed the boost back to 12.5 psi. So essentially if you put a 3.1" pulley on a stock car you would still only get 12.5 psi, you would just hit 12.5 psi quicker in the lower RPMs. I think it bleeds at 12.5 at least, it might be 13 psi... either way you cannot got past that. Now with the stage 1 or 2 tune the supercharger does not look like it bleeds boost at all unless it detects high IAT2 temps or abuse.
09-12-2007, 08:56 PM
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: 01-23-06
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
09-12-2007, 09:01 PM
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-14-05
Location: Phx, AZ
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
a cai intake will do more for the car than a stage kit to be honest because the car with the cai will gain power quicker and boost will come much faster than a stage 1 or 2 car. I would go as far as to say a cai would be the same as a stage2 with a 2.9
09-13-2007, 01:59 AM
#72
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-03-07
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
09-13-2007, 02:00 AM
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-13-06
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Our stock intake is not very restricted, and already resides in the CAI spot. I agree with infinityzen i could barely feel the CAI on a stage 2, but a 2.9 was a lovely improvement.
09-13-2007, 02:32 AM
#74
Senior Member
Join Date: 08-28-05
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ya im sorry, but you cannot be serious. you cant feel a couple of whp... sure there is a lil better throttle response but nothing drastic.