stage2 datalog
#1
Rent me! per hour
Thread Starter
Join Date: 03-22-07
Location: Still fixing others mistakes.
Posts: 24,185
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
14 Posts
stage2 datalog
still think the 42.5lb/hr injectors are still small?
one might think so, but gm doesn't.
this log is a straight gm tune, aside from torque management removal. nothing done to the PE file, nothing on spark advance. so unless someone on here got the config file wrong on the duty cycle.
so my thinking is this. yes the stage 2 runs rich {about 10.7a/f} call me crazy!
that run was a second gear pull, nothing special.
third gear pull
again, stock gm issue stage 2 tune. nothing done.
one might think so, but gm doesn't.
this log is a straight gm tune, aside from torque management removal. nothing done to the PE file, nothing on spark advance. so unless someone on here got the config file wrong on the duty cycle.
so my thinking is this. yes the stage 2 runs rich {about 10.7a/f} call me crazy!
that run was a second gear pull, nothing special.
third gear pull
again, stock gm issue stage 2 tune. nothing done.
#4
Rent me! per hour
Thread Starter
Join Date: 03-22-07
Location: Still fixing others mistakes.
Posts: 24,185
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
14 Posts
you can lean out with the 3.0 pulley, IE stage 2, and get the IDC down, but i doubt it will go below 100. dunno. going to do some more testing.
this is the config file that denny posted on hptuners forum. sooooooooooo there we go
#6
Rent me! per hour
Thread Starter
Join Date: 03-22-07
Location: Still fixing others mistakes.
Posts: 24,185
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
14 Posts
time to do some diggin to see what i can come up with
#10
New Member
Join Date: 04-19-06
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you sure that your inj duty cyle % is being calculated correctly, i.e. with the 42 lb/hr injector in mind and not stock (which to me would appear to be the default in any tuner application). Just wondering...cause that would make sense given those numbers.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: 12-20-06
Location: Calgary, AB Canada
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2.85 and 42' tune
I tried two diferent config files, one had a IDC of about 92 % on the first one. I then tuned the car tried a diferent PID and got a IDC of just under 50 %. What is up with that. I am confused. I tried re-aplying the IDC scan to the PID but got the same results of less than 50 %. hmmm
P.S. How do you post pics. Itried but can't get it to work. If I can post a pic I will put my log file up.
I tried two diferent config files, one had a IDC of about 92 % on the first one. I then tuned the car tried a diferent PID and got a IDC of just under 50 %. What is up with that. I am confused. I tried re-aplying the IDC scan to the PID but got the same results of less than 50 %. hmmm
P.S. How do you post pics. Itried but can't get it to work. If I can post a pic I will put my log file up.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: 11-11-05
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Posts: 9,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the first config file is one I posted to the hptuners site....its correct. I have another bit of info if you want to check out the math, here it is http://www.stealth316.com/2-calc-idc.htm
try uploading the pics to the gallery then it'll be easier to get them on here.
try uploading the pics to the gallery then it'll be easier to get them on here.
#13
Senior Member
i remember someone talking about HP tuners not giving the correct duty cycle without changing some variable....
Im just diggin at an old memory here....but im sure someone will know what im talkin about.
Im just diggin at an old memory here....but im sure someone will know what im talkin about.
#14
Rent me! per hour
Thread Starter
Join Date: 03-22-07
Location: Still fixing others mistakes.
Posts: 24,185
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
14 Posts
there is no way in hell that gm would put out a car, with 122% duty cycle.
im not even sure how close to be accurate that is on the PID file.
with duty cycle comming closer to 100% the engine will lean out because it can not keep up. how ever, the highest i say with the 2.8 was 117 at 7100 rpms. yes the 2.8 leans it out, hence lower duty cycle due to more air being thrown in, and no fuel compensating for it.
im not even sure how close to be accurate that is on the PID file.
with duty cycle comming closer to 100% the engine will lean out because it can not keep up. how ever, the highest i say with the 2.8 was 117 at 7100 rpms. yes the 2.8 leans it out, hence lower duty cycle due to more air being thrown in, and no fuel compensating for it.
#20
Rent me! per hour
Thread Starter
Join Date: 03-22-07
Location: Still fixing others mistakes.
Posts: 24,185
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
14 Posts
ya should!
i was lookin over the log i did on that run, it was not happy. was only seeing max of 12.5 degrees total timing.
ouch.
fixed that problem, it's a happy car now.
in short, the stage 2 tune sucks *****. it's ment too. to be safe for 100k miles.
if it's ment to be safe, why does it knock its ass off?
hmmmmmmmmm
makes one wonder
i was lookin over the log i did on that run, it was not happy. was only seeing max of 12.5 degrees total timing.
ouch.
fixed that problem, it's a happy car now.
in short, the stage 2 tune sucks *****. it's ment too. to be safe for 100k miles.
if it's ment to be safe, why does it knock its ass off?
hmmmmmmmmm
makes one wonder
#23
Senior Member
thats why you get knock
put some 92 in and go get a bottle of NOS Racing formula Octane boost.
the knock will dissapear.
GM wasnt kidding when they say you MUST use premium.
they should have specified that 91 premium isnt good enough.
put some 92 in and go get a bottle of NOS Racing formula Octane boost.
the knock will dissapear.
GM wasnt kidding when they say you MUST use premium.
they should have specified that 91 premium isnt good enough.
#25
Rent me! per hour
Thread Starter
Join Date: 03-22-07
Location: Still fixing others mistakes.
Posts: 24,185
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
14 Posts
cliff notes. I GET MORE KNOCK on 92 then i do 91.
id rather spend the 12 bucks on a couple gallons of 104 unleaded then drop 12 bucks for half a point of octane boost.
if you want to try it, be my guest, but don't blame me for something i said.
yes the duty cycle is lower {because the 2.8 leans it out}
yes there is a greater risk of blowing it due to heat and various other things.
Last edited by Area47; 04-24-2007 at 02:15 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost