tvs min requirements/min power gain
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-06-07
Location: everywhere
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
tvs min requirements/min power gain
I was tossing around the idea of getting a tvs. I was thinking about going stage 1 from otto. I figured if i was going to drop 500 on on something that had no were else to go, i should invest in something with more head room. I'm all stock right now.
1. what are the min mods for the tvs to run the same size pulley as stock? I know 60s and a good tune, anything else?
2. what would the gains be with the stock pulley size on the tvs all else being the same?
thanks
1. what are the min mods for the tvs to run the same size pulley as stock? I know 60s and a good tune, anything else?
2. what would the gains be with the stock pulley size on the tvs all else being the same?
thanks
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-06-07
Location: everywhere
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-06-07
Location: everywhere
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was tossing around the idea of getting a tvs. I was thinking about going stage 1 from otto. I figured if i was going to drop 500 on on something that had no were else to go, i should invest in something with more head room. I'm all stock right now.
1. what are the min mods for the tvs to run the same size pulley as stock? I know 60s and a good tune, anything else?
2. what would the gains be with the stock pulley size on the tvs all else being the same?
thanks
1. what are the min mods for the tvs to run the same size pulley as stock? I know 60s and a good tune, anything else?
2. what would the gains be with the stock pulley size on the tvs all else being the same?
thanks
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-06-05
Location: Seneca, South Carolina
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I think the biggest pulley it comes with is 3.1, and all you need is 60's and a tune.
gains would be pretty good, but making a lot of heat, you would have to let the car cool down A LOT if you planned to run it hard at all.
gains would be pretty good, but making a lot of heat, you would have to let the car cool down A LOT if you planned to run it hard at all.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-06-07
Location: everywhere
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
once in a while going wot on the road to 70ish. I planning on doing the supporting mods...mostly from reading your thread in the future. I was just curious if can get away without them at first. thanks
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-22-06
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do a few cooling mods, possibly water meth and you'll have a lot of room to grow with the 60's and tune and you wont have to worry about heat.
I wish the tvs was around two years ago, I would have started with it, 60's and water meth and nothing else. Too late now though...
I wish the tvs was around two years ago, I would have started with it, 60's and water meth and nothing else. Too late now though...
#11
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 01-23-06
Location: on here
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The largest pulley it comes with is a 3.54" pulley and after that you have hood clearance problems. That pulley will max 42lb injectors and make more power then a 2.9" pullied m62 lsj. I would not recommend getting this just to strap on there is much work that has to be done to support such a modification.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-06-07
Location: everywhere
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The largest pulley it comes with is a 3.54" pulley and after that you have hood clearance problems. That pulley will max 42lb injectors and make more power then a 2.9" pullied m62 lsj. I would not recommend getting this just to strap on there is much work that has to be done to support such a modification.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-06-07
Location: everywhere
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#17
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
My suggestion would always be, do your supporting mods first, not after something fails. Trying to do things by not spending now, usually costs you more in the long run, IMHO.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-05-07
Location: Sasebo Japan
Posts: 10,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-06-07
Location: everywhere
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just a thought, i was hop;ing someone tested a blower with a 3.4 or something along those lines
#20
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 01-23-06
Location: on here
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so, you wouldn't suggest buying the tvs for my reasons? I know it won't be at is full potential till the rest of the things are there. I was just curious if i would be safe to run with a larger pulley and 60s. I was hoping for 250-260 to the wheels and trap in the quarter mile around 105-108.
thats kind of the thought basis I was working with. I didn't want to spend money on stuff that would be replaced. thats why I was curious if i could run a larger pulley at first(on the tvs). I wanted to know if it was safe. I have no intentions of letting stuff break and then getting cooling mods. I was thinking since this blower is more efficant...using the same size pulley as stock would yield the same iat2 degrees, but with a gain in power.
just a thought, i was hop;ing someone tested a blower with a 3.4 or something along those lines
just a thought, i was hop;ing someone tested a blower with a 3.4 or something along those lines
Yes it was tested i have results for it on another forum, the car made 10 more hp the a 2.9 42lb car.
Also one thing to take into account is that although it is the same size pulley it is a much larger difference in psi and that is going to lead to heat.
Last edited by lsjwannabe; 10-22-2008 at 12:39 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-06-07
Location: everywhere
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=lsjwannabe;3014640]You can run it on the stock size pulley the 3.34" i believe that puts you around 17~18 PSI on a stock exhuast car. The car would perform similar to a 2.8 60's car probably looking at mid 13's and 104~106 trap. As mentioned though this is still a roots style blower albeit much more efficent then our stock unit it will eventually run into heat issue's which is why the supporting mods are so important.
Yes it was tested i have results for it on another forum, the car made 10 more hp the a 2.9 42lb car.
Also one thing to take into account is that although it is the same size pulley it is a much larger difference in psi and that is going to lead to heat.[/QUOTE]
thanks, that is what I was looking for.
Yes it was tested i have results for it on another forum, the car made 10 more hp the a 2.9 42lb car.
Also one thing to take into account is that although it is the same size pulley it is a much larger difference in psi and that is going to lead to heat.[/QUOTE]
thanks, that is what I was looking for.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post