2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.
View Poll Results: Which one you think is better?
Twin Screw
58.95%
Procharger
41.05%
Voters: 95. You may not vote on this poll

Twin Screw vs Procharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-13-2007, 01:35 PM
  #26  
Banned
 
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-07
Location: Az
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by elecblue06
you'll probably find out in a week or 2(according to his thread) you stankin' hater
I'm not a hater i just think using it on our cars is a huge mistake. People think it's going to be badass and i think they're going to be disappointed.
Old 07-13-2007, 01:42 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
elecblue06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-19-07
Location: newburgh,ny
Posts: 14,911
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
haha i'm just messing around ... it performed well on a few ions they've done... why would it be different on the lsj cobalt?
Old 07-13-2007, 02:34 PM
  #28  
Banned
 
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-07
Location: Az
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by elecblue06
haha i'm just messing around ... it performed well on a few ions they've done... why would it be different on the lsj cobalt?
Elec,

Where could i find the dyno graph's of those procharged ion's?
Old 07-13-2007, 03:29 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
elecblue06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-19-07
Location: newburgh,ny
Posts: 14,911
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i'll see if i can get it or pm speed mafia.. put down 215 WHP on a 2.2 IIRC
Old 07-13-2007, 04:06 PM
  #30  
Banned
 
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-07
Location: Az
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by elecblue06
i'll see if i can get it or pm speed mafia.. put down 215 WHP on a 2.2 IIRC
Thanks

Originally Posted by elecblue06
a T/s will make more than 300WHP i think you miss read his explanation, it'll make about 20% more HP than the stock m62, but it maxes out at about 400 less CFM than a c-1 blower... thus giving th procharger the ability to push out some higher numbers, a procharger is more of a whistle, and yes you can have a blow off valve...
Just because the procharger pushes more air doesn't mean it's going to make more power then it. If we had a 1.6L whipple kit for us it would make 400 horsepower eaisly but that is with a built engine. I imagine it would make 300-330whp with stock internals.
Old 07-13-2007, 04:13 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
PuSha050's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-11-05
Location: Yonkers NY
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
Just because the procharger pushes more air doesn't mean it's going to make more power then it. If we had a 1.6L whipple kit for us it would make 400 horsepower eaisly but that is with a built engine. I imagine it would make 300-330whp with stock internals.
u do know thats how u make more power.. to flow more air ... right?
Old 07-13-2007, 04:26 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
elecblue06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-19-07
Location: newburgh,ny
Posts: 14,911
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
Thanks



Just because the procharger pushes more air doesn't mean it's going to make more power then it. If we had a 1.6L whipple kit for us it would make 400 horsepower eaisly but that is with a built engine. I imagine it would make 300-330whp with stock internals.
ummm CFM is key to any set up really...

C-1
7"
boosted HP:675hp
NA hp: 150-325hp
1000 CFM
24 psi max boost
Old 07-13-2007, 04:26 PM
  #33  
Banned
 
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-07
Location: Az
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PuSha050
u do know thats how u make more power.. to flow more air ... right?
Bottleneck is our head.. Not the procharger.

C1 : 1000cfm
1.6L whipple : 997cfm

3cfm won't make a difference
Old 07-13-2007, 04:34 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
elecblue06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-19-07
Location: newburgh,ny
Posts: 14,911
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by PuSha050
u do know thats how u make more power.. to flow more air ... right?
haha you got to it before me...+1

Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
Bottleneck is our head.. Not the procharger.

C1 : 1000cfm
1.6L whipple : 997cfm

3cfm won't make a difference
it all depends on which system you use... that should've been obvious haha

Last edited by elecblue06; 07-13-2007 at 04:34 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 07-13-2007, 09:21 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Cobalt_Supercharged's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-08-05
Location: AZ
Posts: 5,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It all depends on the pulley size and the pressure ratio. I mean each has thier bennefits and draw backs. The bennefit of the centrifugal is that it is more efficient the faster it spins meaning peak boost at max RPM. The downside is that it doesn't move air linearly meaning the boost is different depending on engine speed...unless you spin the wheel faster than you need to and then bypass the extra pressure.

The twin-screw builds boost linearly meaning once you have the pulley selected, it will make that amount of boost from idle to red line. Downside is it is always consuming hp and creating heat.

Both have internal compression which produces less heat than the roots.
Old 07-13-2007, 09:30 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Blown 4-banger's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-03-06
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 7,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
Bottleneck is our head.. Not the procharger.

C1 : 1000cfm
1.6L whipple : 997cfm

3cfm won't make a difference
2.3L Whipple : 1274 cfm
Old 07-13-2007, 09:48 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
elecblue06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-19-07
Location: newburgh,ny
Posts: 14,911
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Blown 4-banger
2.3L Whipple : 1274 cfm
will that even fit under the hood hahaha
Old 07-13-2007, 09:56 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Blown 4-banger's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-03-06
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 7,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by elecblue06
will that even fit under the hood hahaha
Heres the scary thing. I made a paper replica of this blower using the dimesions from whipples web site. Checked under my car, and with the help of a custom sheet metal intake, this blower WILL fit under the hood, with the pulley in stock position. Now you know why I'm building my internals so insanly...
Old 07-13-2007, 10:04 PM
  #39  
Banned
 
shawns94's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-16-07
Location: Fort Leavenworth
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
blown are you going to custom build your setup or buy from someone.
Old 07-13-2007, 10:04 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
elecblue06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-19-07
Location: newburgh,ny
Posts: 14,911
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
haha have fun with that man
Old 07-13-2007, 10:32 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
braddddddd991's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-04-06
Location: florida
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im gettin a 2.2 kenne bell =] i wish
Old 07-13-2007, 11:22 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
chevytech007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-12-06
Location: ridgecrest, ca
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So heres a question? what supercharger are they using for the Twinscrew? If I remember its only a 1200ax isnt it? I think any TS will fit under the hood the way are setup is. And A custom intake manifold would be great but its very expansive. But its very do-able.
Just think of the traction issue with 20 psi @ 3000rpm.

I may have to look at this a little better. How many would be interested in a custom manifold for a 2.2l kenne bell? Or a kit? Maybe that will be my next project after the procharger.
Old 07-13-2007, 11:25 PM
  #43  
Banned
 
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-07
Location: Az
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Note to self. Steal cameron's car when it's finished
Old 07-13-2007, 11:26 PM
  #44  
Banned
 
shawns94's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-16-07
Location: Fort Leavenworth
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey chevy you just need to focus on my procharger kit LOL
Old 07-13-2007, 11:35 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
chevytech007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-12-06
Location: ridgecrest, ca
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I focus on a lot more then just the procharger kit. The other stuff pays the bills right now!
And it keeps me from going insain about my parts in the mail not getting here yet.
Old 07-14-2007, 02:14 AM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
Speed Mafia's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-05
Location: mile high denver co
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well gentlemen i just read 3 pages of information....i appreciate your thoughts and opinions on this TS Vs ProCharger....i thinks its great...i love competition and i thought about writing up a whole page of info but i figured i would not...simple and easiest way is to get the head unit on ChevyTech007 car and he will put down the numbers and vids and what other info you guys are wanting and let the product do the talking....

I think that is the easiest way to settle the debate...

Old 07-14-2007, 03:37 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Cobalt_Supercharged's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-08-05
Location: AZ
Posts: 5,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't wait to see the results. I really want to see what ends up being the most efficient in the end. I personally like the characteristics of the positive displacement chargers, but I understand each has their ideal application.
Old 07-14-2007, 04:03 AM
  #48  
Banned
 
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-07
Location: Az
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Speed Mafia
well gentlemen i just read 3 pages of information....i appreciate your thoughts and opinions on this TS Vs ProCharger....i thinks its great...i love competition and i thought about writing up a whole page of info but i figured i would not...simple and easiest way is to get the head unit on ChevyTech007 car and he will put down the numbers and vids and what other info you guys are wanting and let the product do the talking....

I think that is the easiest way to settle the debate...

How does that settle anything? The twin screw is not a roots. Also notice how it says you can only run 5 psi on 9.5:1 compression and there are guys running 16psi on the LSJ. Graph is bullshit and just a tool to fool wannabe buyers.
Old 07-14-2007, 04:13 AM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
helty's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-20-05
Location: Kingsville, MD
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
for you guys who would miss the whine of a roots/twin screw if you went with a centri, the whistle of a centri at idle is just as cool......especially when you're at a red light next to someone with the "wtf is that" look on their face. but people telling you theres something wrong with your car every time you pull into a gas station does get old after a while.

both have their pros and cons. power under the curve vs. peak power, instant vs. linear, whine vs. whistle.......good luck with your decison.
Old 07-14-2007, 04:47 AM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
InfinityzeN's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-02-06
Location: Harker Heights, TX
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Roots is not actually putting out boost (compressed air) into the engine. The psi is the pressure in the manifold. So the better you flow, the less psi you will see with a roots. Try that with the others.


Quick Reply: Twin Screw vs Procharger



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:25 PM.