View Poll Results: Which one you think is better?
Voters: 95. You may not vote on this poll
Twin Screw vs Procharger
07-16-2007, 02:56 AM
#76
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-24-07
Location: Wheaton, Illinois
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Little side note about T/S superchargers...unlike the Roots type supercharger the twin-screw exhibits internal compression..
it has a much more complex rotor design... as you can see here.
twin screw:
roots:
it has a much more complex rotor design... as you can see here.
twin screw:
roots:
07-22-2007, 02:35 AM
#86
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-03-06
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 7,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At my old work, we dyno'd a 540 big block chevy with a F3R procharger... ****** made 2300 hp!!!!111!1!1!!!oneone!!one!!11
Then a couple months later we dyno'd another 540 BBC, but with an unintercooled F1 at 10 psi. Made 1358 hp on 91 octane
Then a couple months later we dyno'd another 540 BBC, but with an unintercooled F1 at 10 psi. Made 1358 hp on 91 octane
Supercharger MUST have a whine, its in the rule book
07-22-2007, 02:47 AM
#89
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-03-07
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-22-2007, 09:24 PM
#91
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-04-05
Location: mile high denver co
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i dont even doubt it...the cfm is unreal so that is why we are worried the 2.95 pulley is to small might be flowing to much cfm :O
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
importkiller
Problems/Service/Maintenance
11
09-30-2015 07:18 PM
XStylus
Forced Induction
2
09-16-2015 06:19 AM
Getaway_Driver
Problems/Service/Maintenance
41
09-08-2015 09:41 AM