2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Why aren't the SS' running high 13's 200+ whp stock?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-2006, 09:27 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
GTPUSER's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-27-06
Location: Orlando
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why aren't the SS' running high 13's 200+ whp stock?

I was just wondering that why aren't the Cobalt SS' running high 13's when some of them are putting down 200-230 whp stock + intake? My GTP with just a smaller pulley (3.4 vs 3.8 stock) short ram intake, reprogrammed pcm, and ubend delete was running high 13's. I never had it dynoed but from other people on the forums I could estimate about 220-230 whp and that was heavier car at 3400+lbs.

If I do a GM Stage 2 + intake on my new cobalt will that possibly get me into the 13's if I can drive it and launch it perfectly??
Old 07-28-2006, 09:37 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
StinkBOMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-11-06
Location: Hubert NC
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would say traction is a big issue. Unless everything is perfect, I spin all the way through 1st, and through some of 2nd. It sucks I have to launch at a ridiculously low RPM. But, there is hope, traction bars, torque dampeners and new mounts get wheel hop and spin way down.
Old 07-28-2006, 09:41 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Platinum Member
 
DC52NV's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-24-05
Location: California
Posts: 14,301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
it can be numerous things. gearing, weather, tires, driver, clutch, aerodynamics, etc.
Old 07-28-2006, 09:42 PM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
GTPUSER's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-27-06
Location: Orlando
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats what I was thinking was gonna be the answer, Thanks!
Old 07-28-2006, 09:46 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Cobalt_Supercharged's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-08-05
Location: AZ
Posts: 5,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wheel hop is a major deterent for many to aggressivly launch. That is why our times suck IMO. We have terrible 60' times. Also first gear is practically a granny gear, but second is too tall to start in.
Old 07-28-2006, 09:59 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
sethallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-25-05
Location: Detroit MI to San Diego
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
btw, there are plenty of guys in the 13's..even some into 12's
Old 07-28-2006, 10:03 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
FAST06SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-07-05
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GTPUSER
I was just wondering that why aren't the Cobalt SS' running high 13's when some of them are putting down 200-230 whp stock + intake? My GTP with just a smaller pulley (3.4 vs 3.8 stock) short ram intake, reprogrammed pcm, and ubend delete was running high 13's. I never had it dynoed but from other people on the forums I could estimate about 220-230 whp and that was heavier car at 3400+lbs.

If I do a GM Stage 2 + intake on my new cobalt will that possibly get me into the 13's if I can drive it and launch it perfectly??

That answer is easy since i own the fastest Impala and Cobalt and the Impala is the same as your GTP,

TORQUE

But i will tell you something, line your car and Cobalt up on a hot day and the Cobalt will take you. Your 13.9 was on a cold day
Old 07-28-2006, 10:12 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
sethallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-25-05
Location: Detroit MI to San Diego
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
speaking of the 12's ^^^^^^^
Old 07-28-2006, 10:22 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
FAST06SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-07-05
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DC52NV
not just all bout tq. if that were the case then hondas would not be hitting below 12's.
Ok wise one, i have n't added ANY HP to my car but added almost 40lbft of TQ and i gained 5mph and .6 tenths off in the 1/4 with just TORQUE alone. I could give you many more examples but obviously you don't understand. The honda's have TQ, either when they hit thier 200hp nitrous or at 8500rpm.


Tell that to the S2000 i HALFTRACKED this past tuesday. I think he ran 14.8@92 with MORE HP than me!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yea, TQ means nothing
Old 07-28-2006, 10:25 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Xenozx's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-01-05
Location: Delaware
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yea Its all traction. I mean I am doing 13.7 w/ a crappy 2.25 60 foot and that was pretty much w/ stage 2 and bolt ons. Also in 90-100 degree heat w/ stock crap tires taht where going balt (I have 13,000 miles on my car now)

If I could get a good launch IM sure I am capable of low 13 second passes. I am waiting for it to cool down and put my P nero's back on and see what I can do. they seemed to be stickier tires even in the cold.

When I had them on I was doing 2.1 60 foots before stage 2 in cold weather, so I am doing 2.3's now with the stock tires and 100 degree heat when they should be warmer and stickier, but they arnt.
Old 07-28-2006, 10:39 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
Platinum Member
 
DC52NV's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-24-05
Location: California
Posts: 14,301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by FAST06SS
Ok wise one, i have n't added ANY HP to my car but added almost 40lbft of TQ and i gained 5mph and .6 tenths off in the 1/4 with just TORQUE alone. I could give you many more examples but obviously you don't understand. The honda's have TQ, either when they hit thier 200hp nitrous or at 8500rpm.


Tell that to the S2000 i HALFTRACKED this past tuesday. I think he ran 14.8@92 with MORE HP than me!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yea, TQ means nothing
never said tq doesn't mean anything. all i said is it's not all about tq. i knew you would react like this, that is why i deleted my post. you seemed to quote me before i deleted it. oh well.

Last edited by DC52NV; 07-28-2006 at 11:21 PM.
Old 07-28-2006, 11:04 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
IMADreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-06
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,755
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well it really is a combination of everything. Torque is important, but traction seems to be the biggest hurdle to overcome. The traction issue is tough because the car is FWD, plus 1st gear is too short and really helps promote wheels spin.
Old 07-28-2006, 11:29 PM
  #13  
Member
Thread Starter
 
GTPUSER's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-27-06
Location: Orlando
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FAST06SS
That answer is easy since i own the fastest Impala and Cobalt and the Impala is the same as your GTP,

TORQUE

But i will tell you something, line your car and Cobalt up on a hot day and the Cobalt will take you. Your 13.9 was on a cold day
I don't have the GTP anymore, got the Cobalt the other day.
Old 07-28-2006, 11:34 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
HackAbuse's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-16-05
Location: Central NY
Posts: 11,137
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Drag Radials.

You guys are right about the SS first gear though. I get the same 60' times as a stock SS/SC with my LS Auto Four Door
Old 07-29-2006, 12:04 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
FAST06SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-07-05
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DC52NV
never said tq doesn't mean anything. all i said is it's not all about tq. i knew you would react like this, that is why i deleted my post. you seemed to quote me before i deleted it. oh well.
It's all good, wasn't mad. Just trying to make a point
Old 07-29-2006, 03:50 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
cobalt8's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-06
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
stage2+intake+good driving can get you mid 13s.
Old 07-29-2006, 04:09 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Psykostevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-06
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,911
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by GTPUSER
I don't have the GTP anymore, got the Cobalt the other day.
Many of us, including my self gave up their GTP for a Cobalt SS/SC. The SS is way more fun to drive, and looks like you "think" you're fast, so people want to race to prove you wrong. The GTP was the other way. It had a reputation that made most people not want to race you.
Old 07-29-2006, 04:13 AM
  #18  
Banned
 
CoBOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-14-06
Location: OK
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FAST06SS
Ok wise one, i have n't added ANY HP to my car but added almost 40lbft of TQ and i gained 5mph and .6 tenths off in the 1/4 with just TORQUE alone. I could give you many more examples but obviously you don't understand. The honda's have TQ, either when they hit thier 200hp nitrous or at 8500rpm.


Tell that to the S2000 i HALFTRACKED this past tuesday. I think he ran 14.8@92 with MORE HP than me!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yea, TQ means nothing
Where did you add the 40ft.lbs??? The horsepower didn't increase in the same area??? Torque is never alone, as horsepower is never alone. But in MOST racing situations (read:not all) horsepower is considered more important.
Old 07-29-2006, 05:06 AM
  #19  
Banned
 
CoBOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-14-06
Location: OK
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HackAbuse
Drag Radials.

You guys are right about the SS first gear though. I get the same 60' times as a stock SS/SC with my LS Auto Four Door
Didn't you already say this????

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/show...2&postcount=15

Stock Buick Roadmasters can pull 2.2 60'. What does it matter that your car with 140 or whatever ft.lbs can pull the same 60' as a car with 190 ft.lbs.????
Old 07-29-2006, 10:23 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Darksun's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-04-05
Location: LongIsland
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i would say in stock form its gearing only thing holding a good driver back from a 13 sec slip. Even though i still think even with everything in your favor short of the timming mechine messing up a stock cobalt cant pull a 13 sec pass
Old 07-29-2006, 10:36 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Bad06SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-05
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by CoBOT
Where did you add the 40ft.lbs??? The horsepower didn't increase in the same area??? Torque is never alone, as horsepower is never alone. But in MOST racing situations (read:not all) horsepower is considered more important.

You're clearly showing your lack of the ability to do a search. Rob has posted his dyno sheets and gains since day one. Going from a 2.8 to a 2.5" pulley didn't really net him much power, but a bunch of torque. Do a search for Rob's threads and posts and you'll see.
Old 07-29-2006, 12:02 PM
  #22  
Member
 
03gobluecobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-29-05
Location: motor city
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Traction and gearing really hurt this car in the 1/4 mile.
Old 07-29-2006, 12:04 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Bad06SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-05
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 03gobluecobra
Traction and gearing really hurt this car in the 1/4 mile.
That's for sure. If they would just put a close ratio 6-speed transmission in this car, this car would be considerably faster.
Old 07-29-2006, 03:18 PM
  #24  
New Member
 
crazysteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-02-06
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow and i thought my 2.19 60' was bad for a stock car and my first trip ever to a drap strip.
Old 07-29-2006, 03:25 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
cawpin's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-26-06
Location: N/A
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bad06SS
You're clearly showing your lack of the ability to do a search. Rob has posted his dyno sheets and gains since day one. Going from a 2.8 to a 2.5" pulley didn't really net him much power, but a bunch of torque. Do a search for Rob's threads and posts and you'll see.
That's all fine and dandy but it isn't correct. You CANNOT add torque without adding horsepower (at the same RPM). It is impossible. His torque was probably added below 5252 RPM so the HP increase wasn't huge but it was there. Add torque above 5252 and see what your HP does.


Quick Reply: Why aren't the SS' running high 13's 200+ whp stock?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:39 PM.