2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

07 Tuners..... :)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2008, 05:32 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
409Cobalt07's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-29-07
Location: Beaumont, TX
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i dont have an cel from my dp with highflow cat....but im definaltly interested in the tune. what will it do for my balt? with full bolt ons and nitrous. granted the nitrous kinda in a way tunes for it self with it being a wet shot... but there has to be more of a gain than that with aftermafket parts... im just wondering if the gains with bolts on is worth the $...?
Old 06-16-2008, 06:11 PM
  #27  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
dragonkingg5's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-08-08
Location: Langley AFB, VA
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is that 136 hp WITH the tune? even stock, theres no way you can be at that hp with a tune. ppl are at that stock already off the assembly line.

thoery is, maybe the more mods you have, the bigger benefit you get from the tune.
idk. i'll email vince tommorrow see what he says.
Old 06-16-2008, 07:07 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
warrenb213's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-09-07
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you dragon, for being smart about this.

When dealing with a STOCK 4-banger there is not much more to pull from it. The more mods, the more tuning helps. Hence why NWAE put down only 10 more hp than me till he got tuned, at which time he practically saw 20hp total above stock.

So, the more mods the more the tune will help. In my case, it truly helped my engine manage itself much more efficiently.

Once I go intake/exhaust I expect I'll be right on par with NWAE. And then maybe a mild cam and have it tuned for that, which will give it even more than if i had just thrown a cam in on stock tune.

It's all about what you have. Didn't expect anything more out of mine really. It's much peppier though, any stock ls's wanna race now? :-P
Old 06-16-2008, 08:42 PM
  #29  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
dragonkingg5's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-08-08
Location: Langley AFB, VA
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i only have a cai and catback. so when i get the tune, i wont look for to much gain until i get the 2.4 intake mani. but with a cai, maybe vince can tell the engine to suck in more air cause of the 3" pipe that allows more airflow already.

If you are bone stock, it is basically a engine tune upper that best deals with MPG and lower accel.

i assumed us 07s would have a lil more hp gain cause of our exhaust mani. but when you look at it, where is the more air going out of the engine if it goes to a 1.5" pipe toward the end. ( stock cat back).

warren, you happen to know what primaries our headers are? zzp is 1.5, dont know if ours is the same more a lil smaller. our dp looks to be about 2" or so right?

the other dynos that vince pulled on a 06 with CAI, 2.4 intake mani, headers, dp and catback gained about 15-20 just off the tune i think. hope with full mods on my car, we can put around that much.
only time will tell.
Old 06-16-2008, 09:35 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
FacelessKhaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-20-07
Location: Fayett-Evil NC
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well Warren, i have the dyno sheet from that tune in hand and here it is:




now keep in mind it was only a 4 hp and a 4 tq point increase on a bone stock 2.2. adding a CAI and exhaust will dramatically increase the numbers. He removed the speed limiter, adjusted the cooling fan timing, fixed the PE Delay for the AFR (as seen in the sheet above, the AFR is completely terrible without the tune) and that was about it. So next step here sometime in the next week or so....Beta test with that tune but with the 2.4 manifold installed....hopefully we can see a substantial gain from that. Enjoy! And hopefully if all goes well, we can have a distributor of Trifecta Tunes on the east coast available within weeks!!!!!
and that rev limiter didn't get removed, it's stop rpm was increased from 6500 to 7000 which is only good if you have the 2.4manifold since it will produce power past 6500 rpm on the 2.2 cars....

Originally Posted by dragonkingg5
i only have a cai and catback. so when i get the tune, i wont look for to much gain until i get the 2.4 intake mani. but with a cai, maybe vince can tell the engine to suck in more air cause of the 3" pipe that allows more airflow already.

If you are bone stock, it is basically a engine tune upper that best deals with MPG and lower accel.

i assumed us 07s would have a lil more hp gain cause of our exhaust mani. but when you look at it, where is the more air going out of the engine if it goes to a 1.5" pipe toward the end. ( stock cat back).

warren, you happen to know what primaries our headers are? zzp is 1.5, dont know if ours is the same more a lil smaller. our dp looks to be about 2" or so right?

the other dynos that vince pulled on a 06 with CAI, 2.4 intake mani, headers, dp and catback gained about 15-20 just off the tune i think. hope with full mods on my car, we can put around that much.
only time will tell.

well Adam, that 136 is with the tune, but only because the car is bone stock, you can't very well pull power out of thin air without something invested in the engine so with the CAI and Catback, expect more than that 4 point gain, it will be more along the lines of 10-15 with that...and with the 2.4 manifold look for about 10-15 with that, so probably a 25-30 total point increase across the board. the primaries are a hair less than 1.5" and the downpipe i do believe is 1 3/4" inches...but i haven't taken a formal measurement. Hopefully that answers your questions and we will have our tune really soon!!

Last edited by FacelessKhaos; 06-16-2008 at 09:41 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 06-16-2008, 09:41 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-27-07
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
glad that you have joined our ranks

and i am sooo not done with my car yet
but i will also have a bike soon to work with
Old 06-16-2008, 09:50 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
FacelessKhaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-20-07
Location: Fayett-Evil NC
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NWAE...the tuning fun isn't over yet, it's only just begun...wait until i test out the tune for the 2.4 manifold and if funds are willing and the car gods are in my favor, forced induction for the 07 without piggyback...
Old 06-16-2008, 09:54 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-27-07
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FacelessKhaos
NWAE...the tuning fun isn't over yet, it's only just begun...wait until i test out the tune for the 2.4 manifold and if funds are willing and the car gods are in my favor, forced induction for the 07 without piggyback...
nice, im working on finding a 2.4 intake mani and throttlebody... then a 50 shot and ill be good to go
Old 06-16-2008, 10:19 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
warrenb213's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-09-07
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
faceless, i hope you didn't get the impression i was knocking anything, in fact this whole time i told everyone exactly how to it was and that i wasn't surprised my car didn't make much more due to me not having more breather parts. and thanks for correcting me, the redline was adjusted.

as i said before, the more parts ya got the merrier. and i'm hella lookin forward to getting my breather mods in and seeing more come out of it.
Old 06-16-2008, 10:36 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
FacelessKhaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-20-07
Location: Fayett-Evil NC
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
warren...no man i didn't get that impression quite the opposite actually...what i got was that you were excited and i am excited as well, Vince is going nuts...he is ecstatic that the tune worked as well as it did...it was what he was expecting out of the tune and about what i was expecting (though i was thinking 5 -7 gain) but then again it was close and it was worth it...now comes the fun stuff..the mod tuning for cold air intakes, exhaust setups, manifold/throttle body swaps, cams, forced induction....etc.

and again i didn't take it as you knocking anything but i was piggybacking on what you where saying and adding to it...and i went ahead and saved you time from uploading the Dyno Numbers..plus i wanted to add some things....so hopefully in about a week or 2 we will see Dyno numbers from a Mustang Dyno with the 2.4 Manifold installed...and if i have time i will have one of the guys in my shop bore out my TB into the 2.4 TB size (about a .020 overbore) and tune all of that together...and hopefully i can get some cash in my hand for the forced induction project i'm working on...whether it be turbo or supercharger (which ever kit is completed first, looking like turbo right now but never know)...

and i'm glad to see that you went up there and did the beta test for the 07 guys...we all owe you a great thanks for doing that because now that tune is the baseline for which all other 07 tunes will be based on. So you doing that will make A LOT of people really happy...especially me. So let me extend my hand and my thanks and a hearty Congrats on the tune.....now start modding lmfao.
Old 06-16-2008, 10:38 PM
  #36  
Slobodan Milošević
iTrader: (8)
 
07blackg5's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-07
Location: Serbia
Posts: 5,960
Received 215 Likes on 175 Posts
so i guess there is no news on deleting the o2 code?
Old 06-16-2008, 10:49 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-27-07
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 07blackg5
so i guess there is no news on deleting the o2 code?
not yet, pm and ask him...he is on the site...
Old 06-16-2008, 11:29 PM
  #38  
Slobodan Milošević
iTrader: (8)
 
07blackg5's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-07
Location: Serbia
Posts: 5,960
Received 215 Likes on 175 Posts
i need an out if the o2 extender doesnt work ha ha. anyone have any experience with them?

so in theory, my 07 2.2 with i/h/d/e a 2.4 intake mani and a tune from vince, i could be pushing near 170 hp????

ive seen 2.2s with i/h/d/e dyno between 140 and 150 hp, so i will say 145.

then a post in here said the tune on a fully bolted 2.2 with 2.4 mani gained 15-20 whp

that puts us at 160whp

plus whatever the 2.4 mani added initally.


i know im talking numbers and will probably get flamed, but im basing on what i assume are real dyno numbers.

Last edited by 07blackg5; 06-16-2008 at 11:29 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 06-17-2008, 03:23 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-27-07
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 07blackg5
i need an out if the o2 extender doesnt work ha ha. anyone have any experience with them?

so in theory, my 07 2.2 with i/h/d/e a 2.4 intake mani and a tune from vince, i could be pushing near 170 hp????

ive seen 2.2s with i/h/d/e dyno between 140 and 150 hp, so i will say 145.

then a post in here said the tune on a fully bolted 2.2 with 2.4 mani gained 15-20 whp

that puts us at 160whp

plus whatever the 2.4 mani added initally.


i know im talking numbers and will probably get flamed, but im basing on what i assume are real dyno numbers.
its all cool. I am at 155 whp w/ h,dp,i,e,t i want to do intake mani and throttle body which will put me at *about* 185whp... *about* so your numbers arent bad...
Old 06-17-2008, 04:53 PM
  #40  
Banned
 
YzRider452's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-29-06
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
30 hp from intake mani and throttle body?
Old 06-17-2008, 04:55 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-27-07
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by YzRider452
30 hp from intake mani and throttle body?
yes....
Old 06-17-2008, 05:37 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
warrenb213's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-09-07
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
gm choking the 2.2. bastards! lol
Old 06-17-2008, 05:37 PM
  #43  
New Member
 
Cammoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-17-07
Location: Sanger Texas
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm going to call bs on that one. You might see 10 to 15 without a tune, 20 max with a tune
Old 06-17-2008, 05:49 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-27-07
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cammoe
I'm going to call bs on that one. You might see 10 to 15 without a tune, 20 max with a tune
it has been shown that without a tune each will show an approx 12 whp increas and that moves to 15 with tuning, each has been tested seperatly, so there are no "official numbers" but this is the simple math of it....so yes

Originally Posted by warrenb213
gm choking the 2.2. bastards! lol

Last edited by NWAE Cobalt; 06-17-2008 at 05:49 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 06-17-2008, 06:02 PM
  #45  
New Member
 
Cammoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-17-07
Location: Sanger Texas
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
then bring on the official numbers. I'm just saying that the odds of that being true are slim to nil. I work on cars day in and day out and most of the time of 4 bangers the odds you picking up 30 to 40 whp requires intake, exhaust, headers (na cars), throttle body, manifold, and even then a tune is still required. there is no way chevy would put out a car that would be that restrictive. the biggest changes you will see especially if you are putting on the 2.4l manifold is a slight increase like 5 whp and a drop in torque. so show me the numbers, and i will believe you, but if you are a going to go buy what others are telling you, you are going to get burnt.
Old 06-17-2008, 06:11 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-27-07
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cammoe
then bring on the official numbers. I'm just saying that the odds of that being true are slim to nil. I work on cars day in and day out and most of the time of 4 bangers the odds you picking up 30 to 40 whp requires intake, exhaust, headers (na cars), throttle body, manifold, and even then a tune is still required. there is no way chevy would put out a car that would be that restrictive. the biggest changes you will see especially if you are putting on the 2.4l manifold is a slight increase like 5 whp and a drop in torque. so show me the numbers, and i will believe you, but if you are a going to go buy what others are telling you, you are going to get burnt.
I dont have them, talked with vince about them and he confered that this is true
Old 06-17-2008, 06:12 PM
  #47  
New Member
 
Cammoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-17-07
Location: Sanger Texas
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
proof i say proof!
Old 06-17-2008, 06:15 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-27-07
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cammoe
proof i say proof!
hahaha, dont have any yet :lol;
Old 06-17-2008, 06:19 PM
  #49  
New Member
 
Cammoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-17-07
Location: Sanger Texas
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
while you are talking to vince ask what other parts are already on the car
Old 06-17-2008, 06:20 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-27-07
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cammoe
while you are talking to vince ask what other parts are already on the car
this was in addition to other parts



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:43 AM.