2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

15.7...whats next?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-21-2007, 11:14 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
umrdyldo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-06-06
Location: MO
Posts: 11,666
Received 65 Likes on 59 Posts
Run with all the extra weight out of the car. You can drop around two tenths off your time from there. 2.4 manifold is a must if you are trying to get better track time. You should easily get into low 15 with that. I did a 15.97 with weight reduction and 2.4 intake manifold
Old 12-21-2007, 02:58 PM
  #27  
Member
 
BlackBaltLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-20-07
Location: collingdale PA
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would suggest to get rid of the LSJ parts and go aftermarket. Once you do that do a 2.4 manifold swap. Maybe try different tires for better traction and lowering the car for better aerodynamics. Mabye a short throw shifter, the less time you spend shifting the more time you spend on the gas pedal. And then theres always weight reduction, theres a video posted by i believe anomolous on how to take out like 140lbs in 20 minutes which will shave about 1-2 tenths off your time. With all that stuff done you should be able to run 15.0 if not a little better. Then you can always run a 50-75 shot for even better results.
Old 12-21-2007, 03:02 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
409Cobalt07's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-29-07
Location: Beaumont, TX
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sick06cobalt
2.4 intake mani + N20
I 2ND THIS!
Old 12-21-2007, 03:03 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
o3nisoaso3's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-07
Location: Irwin, Pa (S of Pittsburgh)
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
have you guys looked into the 2.4 manifold swap or has anyone got it done? i saw the dyno with it on (with intake and exhaust) and was disappointed with the power bein under the 2.2 manifold from 3300-4700 rpms... is it different if you are more modded then just intake and exhaust???
Old 12-22-2007, 12:23 AM
  #30  
Jn2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Jn2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-07
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,791
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
i will get the 2.4 mani later as well, and the spray is a bigger mod that will be later, im badically looking for mods that run 300 or less right now, so i can get them done first<<--basically basic bolt on, andi know the lsj isnt doin all it could be, i talked tot he guy who offered me the CA header, and ima be taking it off his hands later, so thats on part that after market, and i have the lsj springs sitting in the garage, im waiting ti'll i get the body kit on b4 i drop it, i dont want to go to low(lots of speeds bumps on my street, not to mention my driveway to get to my garage is a nice little hill on its own), ps i went to get my car dyno'd today, i they ran it in 4th gear, well guess what? he top'd out on the governer b4 he got to finish, but he managed to get me #'s out of it, note that they didnt have a bif blower in front the car, they just strapped it down, and ran it, so i didnt have any air blowing at it <<--im not going there no more
127.5whp
139.2wtrq
Old 12-22-2007, 12:30 AM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
NJHK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-05-06
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Not being rude but quit being cheap

Either you're doing it right or not doing it at all. It just sounds like you're just adding a bunch of cheap parts to see what you're going to get when in reality...you're not gaining much. Congrats, you're as fast as a stock manual Cavalier. See what I mean?

Make a goal. Save your money. If your goal is not within reach reasonably, don't waste your money.

PS: Fix your misfiring issue. What's the point of modifying a car when your engine doesn't work.
Old 12-22-2007, 12:30 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
roccityroller's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-27-06
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Driver mod is probably your biggest concern. what were you're 60' times?

Other than that, you're not really makin THAT much power that you need to worry about traction/suspension, unless you're spinning then i'd say get some sticker tires.

Get a full exhaust, not LSJ stuff b/c it's not THAT much better. Header, DP, hi-flow cat, cat back. I didn't really read your mod list so just disregard if you have that stuff. That's probably about all the cheap power mods you can do.
Old 12-22-2007, 12:32 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
sick06cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-06-07
Location: somewhere
Posts: 9,714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hey 15.7 isnt bad for a 2.2 though... im looking to get into the low to mid 15s
Old 12-22-2007, 12:33 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
NJHK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-05-06
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Also

Any one stating to do airflow modifications like a larger throttle body or larger / shorter runner intake manifolds, these changes effect intake resonating and velocity. There is no point in doing such a modification because it's just essentially shifting your powerband upwards.

Bigger isn't always better. It can get to a point where it's useless with your engine setup (which it will be).
Old 12-22-2007, 12:35 AM
  #35  
Jn2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Jn2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-07
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,791
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
NJHK, i know whatu mean about being cheap, trust me im not trying to be, im just trying trying to be, even if it sound like it, im just focusing on both performance and appearance, im having ot budget my performance mods,a nd my visual ones, which right now are pretty high, i ordered a body kit im having to get done, and at the same time, im trying to get some mods down to get a bit quicker, and i know the LSJ stuff seems cheap, but hey, the car flow better than it should no? and the real aftermarket will come later, and i take no offense to what u said, i appreciate that u openly said what u felt
Old 12-22-2007, 12:36 AM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
sick06cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-06-07
Location: somewhere
Posts: 9,714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NJHK
Also

Any one stating to do airflow modifications like a larger throttle body or larger / shorter runner intake manifolds, these changes effect intake resonating and velocity. There is no point in doing such a modification because it's just essentially shifting your powerband upwards.

Bigger isn't always better. It can get to a point where it's useless with your engine setup (which it will be).
well adam lets look at it this way... if you add a 2.4 mani... its not plastic for one.. so it will hold up alittle better to the N20 so if you are adding it alone theres not point but if your adding something like more power... then its a worthwhile thing...
Old 12-22-2007, 12:37 AM
  #37  
Jn2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Jn2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-07
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,791
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
hey 15.7 isnt bad for a 2.2 though... im looking to get into the low to mid 15s
yeah i ran 16.7 stock, and while at the track i ran another stock 2.2, i dusted him on my 15.7 run, and than missed a gear on the rematch, i missed second gear and ran a 16.7, he ran perfect and got a 16.6, so i see how much those little things did, and we're both 5 spds, and my 60' is 2.4 at the moment
Old 12-22-2007, 12:38 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
sick06cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-06-07
Location: somewhere
Posts: 9,714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by balmung892003
yeah i ran 16.7 stock, and while at the track i ran another stock 2.2, i dusted him on my 15.7 run, and than missed a gear on the rematch, i missed second gear and ran a 16.7, he ran perfect and got a 16.6, so i see how much those little things did, and we're both 5 spds, and my 60' is 2.4 at the moment
yeah i want to see what i hit with my auto... i guess well findo ut in spring..
Old 12-22-2007, 12:40 AM
  #39  
Jn2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Jn2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-07
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,791
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
i got a buddy with a auto SS who runs 15.7's

i've never personally seen a 2.2 auto run so i wouldnt be able to guve a guesstamate

Last edited by Jn2; 12-22-2007 at 12:40 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 12-22-2007, 12:40 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
roccityroller's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-27-06
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by balmung892003
NJHK, i know whatu mean about being cheap, trust me im not trying to be, im just trying trying to be, even if it sound like it, im just focusing on both performance and appearance, im having ot budget my performance mods,a nd my visual ones, which right now are pretty high, i ordered a body kit im having to get done, and at the same time, im trying to get some mods down to get a bit quicker, and i know the LSJ stuff seems cheap, but hey, the car flow better than it should no? and the real aftermarket will come later, and i take no offense to what u said, i appreciate that u openly said what u felt

That's not what he was neccessarily getting at. He's saying that by adding TB, intake, Manifold, etc, you might be making more power, but your powerband, where all the power is, is going to be much higher, so you might actually be slow. It's a very technical theory as to why this is that i don't really want to get into at 1230 the night before a final. That's a topic for another discussion.
Old 12-22-2007, 12:42 AM
  #41  
Jn2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Jn2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-07
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,791
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
thsan i mis read it, cuz i thought he was callign me cheap for not wanting to do BIG mods, when i was stating that im doing all the small stuff, to get them out the way so i can start with the big, basically im getting all the small things done first, than moving into the bigger ones , i know all about the air thingy and what not lol, yeah i've been around the forums long enough to know what mods arent good for the car
Old 12-22-2007, 12:42 AM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
roccityroller's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-27-06
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by balmung892003
i got a buddy with a auto SS who runs 15.7's

i've never personally seen a 2.2 auto run so i wouldnt be able to guve a guesstamate

what's he have done. That's a really good time for an auto. 2.4 60' is about right for a 15.7. I ran a 15.6 when i was stock and had a 2.2 60'. You should be making more power so if you can get that 60' down around the 2.2 - 2.1 region you might be looking at some nicer times.
Old 12-22-2007, 12:43 AM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
NJHK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-05-06
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by balmung892003
NJHK, i know whatu mean about being cheap, trust me im not trying to be, im just trying trying to be, even if it sound like it, im just focusing on both performance and appearance, im having ot budget my performance mods,a nd my visual ones, which right now are pretty high, i ordered a body kit im having to get done, and at the same time, im trying to get some mods down to get a bit quicker, and i know the LSJ stuff seems cheap, but hey, the car flow better than it should no? and the real aftermarket will come later, and i take no offense to what u said, i appreciate that u openly said what u felt
I understand what you're saying and I've seen this same situation...trust me...

FOCUS ON ONE THING AT A TIME!

When you try and do multiple things at once on a limited budget, you will fail in all areas because nothing will get completed. You'll be one of those guys with a half done exhaust system and a unpainted body kit...
Old 12-22-2007, 12:46 AM
  #44  
Jn2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Jn2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-07
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,791
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
he's got a injen intake and free flowing muffler, and he poly filled his mounts, i think that it, oh and i know about multi taking, which is why im taking it slow, lol to the unpainted body kit though, cuz it is unpainted, and when i install it, it'll be primered grey, but i do have the money ot get it painted, i have it stored away, im waiting for my shop to get the paint ordered so they can paint it
Old 12-22-2007, 12:51 AM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
NJHK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-05-06
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by sick06cobalt
well adam lets look at it this way... if you add a 2.4 mani... its not plastic for one.. so it will hold up alittle better to the N20 so if you are adding it alone theres not point but if your adding something like more power... then its a worthwhile thing...
I'm sorry that's incorrect...

1. Plastic Manifolds aren't weak in his case. Weak is in comparison to what their job is. Manifolds don't carry lava...they care air (oxygen).

2. No matter what manifold material you have, if you have fuel puddling, you CAN put holes in your manifold and yes it can happen to a aluminum manifold with a strong enough detonation. You should be less worried about your manifold and more worried about other engine components getting damaged.

3. This is part of 2...those manifolds, plastic or aluminum are dry style manifolds...dry meaning their sole purpose is to carry oxygen. It is not naturally a wet manifold, meaning, it is not meant for carrying fuel...but could. Fuel can and will puddle under certain circumstances because of the manifold design, not the manifold material. The whole big worry about plastic vs aluminum is useless and pointless and thinking that one is better than the other for nitrous is foolish. It's the design that matters...

Originally Posted by balmung892003
he's got a injen intake and free flowing muffler, and he poly filled his mounts, i think that it, oh and i know about multi taking, which is why im taking it slow, lol to the unpainted body kit though, cuz it is unpainted, and when i install it, it'll be primered grey, but i do have the money ot get it painted, i have it stored away, im waiting for my shop to get the paint ordered so they can paint it
alright.

Well my point is, worry about one thing then the next. Funny enough that appearance usually conflicts with performance (typically weight and/or aerodynamics) but whatever. Make a goal and go for it...don't just modify to modify and hope to get something out of it cause it'll just lead you to be disappointed and waste money.

Also I suggest doing more research. Don't research parts but research function. Learn how a engine works more in-depth. Learn theories. The keyword is learn. If you really want to get into performance and actually succeeding, education is key.

Take it for what it's worth.

Last edited by NJHK; 12-22-2007 at 12:51 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 12-22-2007, 03:33 AM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
o3nisoaso3's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-07
Location: Irwin, Pa (S of Pittsburgh)
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NJHK
I'm sorry that's incorrect...

1. Plastic Manifolds aren't weak in his case. Weak is in comparison to what their job is. Manifolds don't carry lava...they care air (oxygen).

2. No matter what manifold material you have, if you have fuel puddling, you CAN put holes in your manifold and yes it can happen to a aluminum manifold with a strong enough detonation. You should be less worried about your manifold and more worried about other engine components getting damaged.

3. This is part of 2...those manifolds, plastic or aluminum are dry style manifolds...dry meaning their sole purpose is to carry oxygen. It is not naturally a wet manifold, meaning, it is not meant for carrying fuel...but could. Fuel can and will puddle under certain circumstances because of the manifold design, not the manifold material. The whole big worry about plastic vs aluminum is useless and pointless and thinking that one is better than the other for nitrous is foolish. It's the design that matters...



alright.

Well my point is, worry about one thing then the next. Funny enough that appearance usually conflicts with performance (typically weight and/or aerodynamics) but whatever. Make a goal and go for it...don't just modify to modify and hope to get something out of it cause it'll just lead you to be disappointed and waste money.

Also I suggest doing more research. Don't research parts but research function. Learn how a engine works more in-depth. Learn theories. The keyword is learn. If you really want to get into performance and actually succeeding, education is key.

Take it for what it's worth.
this is more bout being rude and being cheap post you made... i was initially the one who asked bout the 2.4 manifold and how it lags in power n tp from 33-47... i saw the dyno from the ppl who offered the kit and didnt like it. do u kno of ne other gains with other mods... like would it be better if more modded than just intake n exhaust??? thanks adam
Old 12-22-2007, 03:36 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
NJHK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-05-06
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by o3nisoaso3
this is more bout being rude and being cheap post you made... i was initially the one who asked bout the 2.4 manifold and how it lags in power n tp from 33-47... i saw the dyno from the ppl who offered the kit and didnt like it. do u kno of ne other gains with other mods... like would it be better if more modded than just intake n exhaust??? thanks adam
Camshafts help determine where your powerband is and your RPMs relate into that equation.

It's alot more than that. I can't just list parts and say get it, you should look into how they operate and the theories behind it.
Old 12-22-2007, 08:40 AM
  #48  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
freakta's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-22-07
Location: milton ma
Posts: 5,578
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.smgautosports.com/

this guy runs crazy times in his 2.2 check out what he offers or give him a call and see what he suggests
Old 12-22-2007, 11:08 PM
  #49  
Member
 
hugemurph4's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-06-07
Location: Franklin TN
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kwest
hey man with your ebay intake and the dryflow, are you getting a check engine light? cause i have the "j-spec" or ebay intake also and i was thinking about the dryflow filter cause it claims no mass air flow sensor problems....
i have the ebay air intake with one of those spectre filters from autozone and i do not have a check engine light
Old 12-22-2007, 11:33 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Dragonsfire12345's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-05
Location: San Antonio,TX
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by balmung892003
he's got a injen intake and free flowing muffler, and he poly filled his mounts, i think that it, oh and i know about multi taking, which is why im taking it slow, lol to the unpainted body kit though, cuz it is unpainted, and when i install it, it'll be primered grey, but i do have the money ot get it painted, i have it stored away, im waiting for my shop to get the paint ordered so they can paint it
you forgot mad automatic 2.4 driving skills



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:24 AM.