2.2 Supercharged 2006 Cobalt
07-11-2007, 03:39 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 07-15-06
Location: Pocomoke City, MD
Posts: 3,765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2.2 Supercharged 2006 Cobalt
Here is 2 videos i thought you guys might want to see, its a 2.2L Cobalt Supercharged swaped from a SS/SC and he is using SMT-7 for tuning
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re97Iy-H-qQ&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2Vpy...elated&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re97Iy-H-qQ&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2Vpy...elated&search=
07-11-2007, 03:43 PM
#2
Senior Member
yeah, weve seen them before. he was on here for a little while to talk about his setup, then he disappeared i think. at least i havent heard from him in a looooooooooong time.
07-11-2007, 03:51 PM
#5
Senior Member
o, never heard that. it was yellowshobalt (or yellowshowbalt), and i just looked the last post about his car is something about a blown tranny..... go figure lol.
07-11-2007, 03:54 PM
#7
Senior Member
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2-2l-l61-performance-tech-45/2-2-transmission-65963/
Last edited by ChrisAult2004; 07-11-2007 at 03:54 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
07-11-2007, 04:00 PM
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 07-15-06
Location: Pocomoke City, MD
Posts: 3,765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah, he swaped it out in the videos i posted with the F23 tranny
its 2999 not 4k, lol did you even go to the web site
its 2999 not 4k, lol did you even go to the web site
Last edited by xCobalt05x; 07-11-2007 at 04:00 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
07-11-2007, 04:03 PM
#11
Senior Member
If I had a separate daily driver, hell yeah, id do the STS. I worked with a guy with a, auto 3.8 Firebird with the STS and he used to run high 12s on that plus a 75 shot on street tires.
07-11-2007, 04:17 PM
#12
nice try it'll cost closer to 4K after custom bending and fabrication...
if it was 3K for the full kit... that would be different....but for the risk or you equipment
but I forgot "im more into the power then the safety, if i blow my engine up doing a 10 second pass on the track, then thats all the worth while i need is to say i have a 10 second 2.2 eco, that is my only consern
not saying that 10 seconds is my goal, just using that as an example about how much consern i have for safety vs power"
so you must live your life 1/4 at a time don't mr. diesel
;D 
:sts doesn't look bad in theory but if you don't have all flat roads like a track it's too risky in my opinion.
on topic... has he posted up his dyno's anywhere? supporting his 285hp claim? i can't find anything ... then again i'm not looking that hard
Last edited by elecblue06; 07-11-2007 at 04:35 PM.
07-11-2007, 04:42 PM
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-25-06
Location: USAG Stuttgart, GER
Posts: 1,860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
elecblue, its 285 wheel horse power on a m62 @ 14psi. get it right =P Maybe he forgot to mention the 50shot? i dunno, i would like to see proof thats all. I dont like people who can talk, but never back it up.
07-11-2007, 04:50 PM
#14
haha yea.. 285WHP on a stock (?) motor seems a bit out there. especially when lsj's are popping and they're pushing out the same numbers and they are tuned...if he has a 50 shot then i can understand ..
i didn't remember if it was 285whp or 285 crank hp crank HP might make sense though
i didn't remember if it was 285whp or 285 crank hp crank HP might make sense though
07-11-2007, 05:32 PM
#15
Senior Member
Universal Turbo Systems require fabrication and do NOT include intake or exhaust tubing, fuel management or tuning
nice try it'll cost closer to 4K after custom bending and fabrication...
if it was 3K for the full kit... that would be different....but for the risk or you equipment
but I forgot "im more into the power then the safety, if i blow my engine up doing a 10 second pass on the track, then thats all the worth while i need is to say i have a 10 second 2.2 eco, that is my only consern
not saying that 10 seconds is my goal, just using that as an example about how much consern i have for safety vs power"
so you must live your life 1/4 at a time don't mr. diesel;D :
sts doesn't look bad in theory but if you don't have all flat roads like a track it's too risky in my opinion.
on topic... has he posted up his dyno's anywhere? supporting his 285hp claim? i can't find anything ... then again i'm not looking that hard
nice try it'll cost closer to 4K after custom bending and fabrication...
if it was 3K for the full kit... that would be different....but for the risk or you equipment
but I forgot "im more into the power then the safety, if i blow my engine up doing a 10 second pass on the track, then thats all the worth while i need is to say i have a 10 second 2.2 eco, that is my only consern
not saying that 10 seconds is my goal, just using that as an example about how much consern i have for safety vs power"
so you must live your life 1/4 at a time don't mr. diesel
;D :sts doesn't look bad in theory but if you don't have all flat roads like a track it's too risky in my opinion.
on topic... has he posted up his dyno's anywhere? supporting his 285hp claim? i can't find anything ... then again i'm not looking that hard
i think you mean reliablilty vs power. if you race, even in a 17 second car, you should definitely be worried about safety. if the motor was blown, that can be dealet with, if you ae running an unsafe setup and fuel line blow and catches the whole car on fire, thats somehting else.
07-11-2007, 05:38 PM
#16
i think you mean reliablilty vs power. if you race, even in a 17 second car, you should definitely be worried about safety. if the motor was blown, that can be dealet with, if you ae running an unsafe setup and fuel line blow and catches the whole car on fire, thats somehting else.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
satisfied
Problems/Service/Maintenance
3
10-19-2015 12:35 AM