2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

2.2 turbo piggyback ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-16-2007, 10:37 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Sh0nuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-09-07
Location: EAST TX
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2.2 turbo piggyback ?

Ok I got a question for everyone, is anyone running a turbo on a 2.2 with a piggy back?
How does it actually run with it? hp? any problems? How much would one expect to pay for a system, for a 2007 2.2? how hard are they to install?

Last edited by Sh0nuff; 09-16-2007 at 10:56 AM.
Old 09-16-2007, 11:36 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
07cobaltguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-01-07
Location: Jackson, Wisconsin
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i think most of us going turbo or sc are waiting for HP tuners, personally i dont want to F around with piggy back, HP is the way to go.
Old 09-16-2007, 11:44 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
djblass's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-29-06
Location: Miami
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HPTUNERS are said their not doing anything for the 2.2 at least for now, best bet is maybe SCT
Old 09-16-2007, 11:48 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
07cobaltguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-01-07
Location: Jackson, Wisconsin
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
ah ok, the last thing i heard was they were and everyones waiting for it, well thats shitty. hmm i guess probably the garrett full kit or the hahn is where its at.
Old 09-16-2007, 01:18 PM
  #5  
I'm old school
 
Halfcent's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-16-05
Location: Nashville
Posts: 6,905
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
AEM FIC:

http://www.aempower.com/ViewCategory...CategoryID=116

It is so far the best option any of us have seen for the Cobalt specifically. I am considering it myself. And the listed price there is just suggested retail. I have seen it from vendors on this site for much almost a hundred bucks less.
Old 09-16-2007, 02:00 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Sh0nuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-09-07
Location: EAST TX
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
so no one has a kit? all inclusive?
Old 09-16-2007, 02:29 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Novajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-18-06
Location: Jacksonville AL
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
piggybacks are our best bet right now. You can use a megasquirt for full standalone...

I've used the aem fi/c before on previous turbo installs. I love aem software. The smt doesn't seem too bad either, but I've personally never used it.

you can get the hahn turbo kit and it's a pretty straight forward install with just a reflash for tuning. Problem is you can't make changes without redoing your software. Really it depends on how mechanically inclined you are. To some people it's a cakewalk and to others it might seem like some crazy impossible job.

There are a few people who've actually turboed their cobalts... I'm sure they'll step in soon
Old 09-16-2007, 02:42 PM
  #8  
I'm old school
 
Halfcent's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-16-05
Location: Nashville
Posts: 6,905
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Sh0nuff
so no one has a kit? all inclusive?
For the 2007, no. However, if you get the Garrett Tuner kit, which is all the necessary hardware, and then use the AEM unit with some bigger injectors, that would include everything you need.
Old 09-16-2007, 02:44 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Sh0nuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-09-07
Location: EAST TX
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
what about the alpine kit for the 2.2? will it work on a 2007?
Old 09-16-2007, 02:55 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Novajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-18-06
Location: Jacksonville AL
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not sure if it would or not. Did a quick search and the add I saw didn't specify years. I'm sure it would bolt up but I don't know if the new ecu they send you comes with sai flashed out or not. That would be the only problem I could think of.
Old 09-16-2007, 07:24 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Sw4y1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-25-06
Location: USAG Stuttgart, GER
Posts: 1,860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The SMT6 has a lot more control over timing and the AEM FIC has better control and features for bigger injectors. The SMT6 cannot replace stock injectors, well it could but im not going to go into the details. The AEM FIC can actually alter the pulse width going to the stock injectors or larger injectors so the car sees no change.

From my experience the smt6 had worked great on my vehicle. I will be keeping it on and running 4 secondary injectors and controlling them via speed density.
Old 09-16-2007, 07:42 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Novajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-18-06
Location: Jacksonville AL
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sw4y1313
The SMT6 has a lot more control over timing and the AEM FIC has better control and features for bigger injectors. The SMT6 cannot replace stock injectors, well it could but im not going to go into the details. The AEM FIC can actually alter the pulse width going to the stock injectors or larger injectors so the car sees no change.

From my experience the smt6 had worked great on my vehicle. I will be keeping it on and running 4 secondary injectors and controlling them via speed density.
as far as boost goes I'd rather have the pulse-width control. The aem can pull timing but can't advance... which doesn't really matter because chances are you're not going to advance timing on a boost app anyway. From what I hear about the smt the aem seems more user friendly anyway.
Old 09-16-2007, 08:48 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Sh0nuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-09-07
Location: EAST TX
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
lets say the garret kit and the aem, how hard do u think it would be to do?
Could you do it with basic tools?
Old 09-16-2007, 08:52 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
NJHK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-05-06
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 07cobaltguy
i think most of us going turbo or sc are waiting for HP tuners, personally i dont want to F around with piggy back, HP is the way to go.
Why are people so scared to use a piggyback with a forced induction setup?

You guys do realize that MANY of higher end cars for YEARS have used piggybacks reliably and still do.

It's all about in the amount of control. You can blow your motor with a standalone, PCM programmer or piggyback but it's in how much control and how well of tuning you're making in the first place.
Old 09-16-2007, 08:53 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
CobaltPerformanceParts's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-29-06
Location: Marquette, MI
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You need a bit more then basic tools. But i wouldnt say it is hard. Just time consuming. The garrett kit comes with instructions and if you follow them to a tee you will be ok. Just dont rush anything. Take your time. Give your self a few good long days to install it and make sure you have a backup car. If you know anyone in your area that has done something like this you may want to ask them for help or find someone that has some mechanical background to help you. Here is a link and a pic to the the aem unit.

AEM Ignition and Fuel Control Unit for the Cobalt

Old 09-16-2007, 08:53 PM
  #16  
Banned
iTrader: (39)
 
mkulrey13's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-30-05
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 18,569
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
the garret alpha comes with tuning... jsut use that it also includes larger injectors.
Old 09-16-2007, 09:15 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Sw4y1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-25-06
Location: USAG Stuttgart, GER
Posts: 1,860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mkulrey13
the garret alpha comes with tuning... jsut use that it also includes larger injectors.
Yes but only for 05-06. hes got an 07
Old 09-16-2007, 09:18 PM
  #18  
Banned
iTrader: (39)
 
mkulrey13's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-30-05
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 18,569
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
ohhh dint realize that
Old 09-16-2007, 09:58 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Novajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-18-06
Location: Jacksonville AL
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sh0nuff
lets say the garret kit and the aem, how hard do u think it would be to do?
Could you do it with basic tools?
depends on what you consider hard and what you consider basic tools. Some people think changing brakes is hard. Then there's people like me that consider 15k in tools to be a "basic" tool set
Old 09-16-2007, 10:10 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Sw4y1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-25-06
Location: USAG Stuttgart, GER
Posts: 1,860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Novajoe
depends on what you consider hard and what you consider basic tools. Some people think changing brakes is hard. Then there's people like me that consider 15k in tools to be a "basic" tool set
I think you need to be my neighbor =P
Old 09-16-2007, 10:15 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Novajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-18-06
Location: Jacksonville AL
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sw4y1313
I think you need to be my neighbor =P
lol yea. My neighbors love me. I have a lift, MODIS, welder, mandrel bender, just about every hand tool/diag tool you can think of in my basement. needless to say all my friends' cars stay in good working order.
Old 09-16-2007, 10:19 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NGalaxyTimmyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-31-05
Location: Dearborn Hts, MI
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
megasquirt is what I would probably go with. The tuning software isn't too hard to use, and helps you out quite a bit, and it's on the cheap side since you have to build it yourself (which from what I've heard teaches you a lot about how your car works)
Old 09-16-2007, 10:32 PM
  #23  
I'm old school
 
Halfcent's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-16-05
Location: Nashville
Posts: 6,905
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
You do realize that megasquirt is a end-user built, stand alone system, right? It would replace the stock ECM. And it only controls fuel, not ignition. And if you use a stand alone computer in a Cobalt, that will really screw the car up. A pre-manufactured piggy back unit like the SMT or AEM units are the way to go.
Old 09-16-2007, 10:38 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Novajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-18-06
Location: Jacksonville AL
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NGalaxyTimmyo
megasquirt is what I would probably go with. The tuning software isn't too hard to use, and helps you out quite a bit, and it's on the cheap side since you have to build it yourself (which from what I've heard teaches you a lot about how your car works)
Megasquirt is AWESOME for the money and gives you alot of control over the car. The only problem is you're going to throw 2 pages worth of codes. It's not going to effect drivability since the bcm will have no control over the engine... but you'll never pass emmissions with the squirt.

If passing emmisions isn't a problem for you, I say go for it. Megasquirt's the ****

www.rs-autosport.com - buy pre-made wiring harnesses and megasquirts. Makes it so easy

http://www.msefi.com/ -testing, troubleshooting, software, etc. all free

Originally Posted by Halfcent
You do realize that megasquirt is a end-user built, stand alone system, right? It would replace the stock ECM. And it only controls fuel, not ignition. And if you use a stand alone computer in a Cobalt, that will really screw the car up. A pre-manufactured piggy back unit like the SMT or AEM units are the way to go.
you can control ignition with a squirt...

hell you can set up automatic nitrous retard, launch control, staged nitrous, etc.

I used the squirt on my 03 neon. It was a little trickier though. Had to fabricate a secondary crank trigger wheel on my underdrive pulley so I could read the ign. It shouldn't be a problem on gm products though. Everything with the megasquirt is gm based.

Last edited by Novajoe; 09-16-2007 at 10:41 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 09-16-2007, 10:39 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Sw4y1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-25-06
Location: USAG Stuttgart, GER
Posts: 1,860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Halfcent
You do realize that megasquirt is a end-user built, stand alone system, right? It would replace the stock ECM. And it only controls fuel, not ignition. And if you use a stand alone computer in a Cobalt, that will really screw the car up. A pre-manufactured piggy back unit like the SMT or AEM units are the way to go.
Actually you can use it as a fuel/ignition standalone and retain all your stock functions. If you put a 12ohm resister in the injector harness the car thinks the stock injectors are there and you can run the larger ones off the MS. The ignition part is a bit more complicated and not worth it really. i would just use an smt6 to control timing and the ms for fuel.


Quick Reply: 2.2 turbo piggyback ?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:42 AM.