2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

Best headers for 2.2?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2007, 12:35 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Balt36's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-06-05
Location: tip of jerz
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Best headers for 2.2?

I was wonderin if u balt nuts can direct me towards the best header out rite now for the 2.2...money aint a problem...any input is appreciated
Old 03-15-2007, 12:39 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Red2.4SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-02-06
Location: SK
Posts: 16,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Check out this thread:

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/show...fficial+header

*edit* I have the first new Clear Image header installed on mine. Its a 4-2-1 design and is availabe with high flow cat down pipe and ceramic coating. It is very nice and gains are noticable.
Call Dan for details, he has a SS/SC in his shop right now test fitting. Should be available very soon.

http://www.clearimageautomotive.com/...obalt%20SS.htm
Old 03-15-2007, 12:44 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Balt36's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-06-05
Location: tip of jerz
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ya but that talks alot about 2.0....i wanna kno about the 2.2
Old 03-15-2007, 12:47 PM
  #4  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (24)
 
TurboTechRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-28-05
Location: On Here
Posts: 13,714
Received 40 Likes on 34 Posts
Pacesetter ceramic coated, we keep them in stock at all times also
Old 03-15-2007, 12:49 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Red2.4SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-02-06
Location: SK
Posts: 16,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2.0, 2.4 and 2.2L headers should be interchangable.
Old 03-15-2007, 01:12 PM
  #6  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (24)
 
TurboTechRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-28-05
Location: On Here
Posts: 13,714
Received 40 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by Red2.4SS
2.0, 2.4 and 2.2L headers should be interchangable.
This is not correct, Pacesetter had tried this. The 2.0 header will only fit on the 2.0, the 2.2 will only fit on the 2.2. Last we heard Pacesetter is working on a header for the 2.4L.
Old 03-15-2007, 01:53 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
RedBaseBolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-28-05
Location: Oshawa, ONT
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have an SS Exhaust Manifold on my 2.2L and it seems to bolt right up with no trouble. I dunno about an actual header though.
Old 03-15-2007, 02:00 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
RuSSo-29's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-20-06
Location: Ridgefield, NJ
Posts: 8,913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The header should be able to fit to all 3? That's what the GM header said if I am not mistaken? I'll go look it up now I guess.
Old 03-15-2007, 02:08 PM
  #9  
New Member
 
AMG_Passion's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-06-07
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All headers will interchange amonsts the 2.0, 2.2, and 2.4
Old 03-15-2007, 02:15 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
RuSSo-29's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-20-06
Location: Ridgefield, NJ
Posts: 8,913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On The GMPP header is made to fit all 3. If thats the case, then the other headers should/will fit.
Old 03-15-2007, 02:40 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
kjn24's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-14-06
Location: Logan, Ohio
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
check out the official aftermarket thread for the 2.2. its a sticky in the 2.2 section and lists about every performance part available for us
Old 03-15-2007, 02:51 PM
  #12  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (24)
 
TurboTechRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-28-05
Location: On Here
Posts: 13,714
Received 40 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by AMG_Passion
All headers will interchange amonsts the 2.0, 2.2, and 2.4
Again this is INCORRECT the reason why the GM extruded manifold fits is because it only replaces down to the collector, where as the pacesetter header replaces further down the exhaust; The pacesetter header replaces just up to the OEM cat converter.

This is why the GMPP will work and all other headers WILL NOT fit.

The Pacesetter header WILL bolt up to all 3 enignes, HOWEVER from what pacesetter stated the down pipe will not work with all 3. That is why Pacesetter is making a header specific for the 2.4L so the downpipe will work; As the downpipe for the 2.0 and 2.2 is different from the downpipe for the 2.4L

Unless Pacesetter has stated different, this is the most recent info.
Old 03-15-2007, 03:19 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
RuSSo-29's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-20-06
Location: Ridgefield, NJ
Posts: 8,913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TurboTechRacing
Again this is INCORRECT the reason why the GM extruded manifold fits is because it only replaces down to the collector, where as the pacesetter header replaces further down the exhaust; The pacesetter header replaces just up to the OEM cat converter.

This is why the GMPP will work and all other headers WILL NOT fit.

The Pacesetter header WILL bolt up to all 3 enignes, HOWEVER from what pacesetter stated the down pipe will not work with all 3. That is why Pacesetter is making a header specific for the 2.4L so the downpipe will work; As the downpipe for the 2.0 and 2.2 is different from the downpipe for the 2.4L

Unless Pacesetter has stated different, this is the most recent info.
So Aaron, that header for the 2.0 will fit the 2.2??

Last edited by RuSSo-29; 03-15-2007 at 03:19 PM. Reason: spelling
Old 03-15-2007, 03:23 PM
  #14  
New Member
 
AMG_Passion's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-06-07
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The header will fit. All three cylinder heads use the same exhaust flange. It may be neccesary to modify the down pipe depending on which car you have.

Just because something isnt a direct bolt, does not mean it doesnt fit.

Oh, and as for the Pacesetter. I recommend avoiding them like the plague. I have never met a person that has had a good experience with a pacesetter. The Pacesetter I used on my NA Talon lasted 5 months (with a flex pipe added in, that pacesetter doesnt include) before it cracked in numerous places. Most guys driving DSM's get less the that if they dont add a flex pipe. 300ZX owners bitch about pacesetter because the ports dont line up with the ports on the head, and the longevity of the pacesetter on the Z's is about as shitty as the DSM's.
Old 03-15-2007, 04:24 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Red2.4SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-02-06
Location: SK
Posts: 16,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't the 2.0 and 2.4L have the same factory exhaust?
Old 03-16-2007, 01:08 AM
  #16  
ORT
Senior Member
 
ORT's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-30-05
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought no matter what when you bought the pacesetter header you had to have a custom down pipe made since its a long style header.
Old 03-16-2007, 01:31 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
IonNinja's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: AZ
Posts: 7,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ORT
I thought no matter what when you bought the pacesetter header you had to have a custom down pipe made since its a long style header.
none of the Pacesetter headers are bolt on so it doesn't matter which one you use...it still needs to be welded to your stock exhaust...which we all know is interchangeable between all models...thus making the Pacesetter header interchangeable between models.

Even if it were bolt on, all of the exhausts have the same routing so it would still be a direct bolt on.
Old 03-16-2007, 01:49 AM
  #18  
New Member
 
phlatcav's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-12-05
Location: louisville, ky
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hrmm, I have the Pacesetter 2.0 header on my 2.2, had to make a custom down pipe though.

never had one single issue with pacesetter
Old 03-16-2007, 02:21 AM
  #19  
Member
 
en0onmai's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-02-06
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't believe that some of the vendors on here don't even know their answers before they post.

All headers will bolt to all engines for the Cobalts (2.0 2.2 2.4). A "long tube" header such as Pacesetter's will require a fabbed up DP to bolt up with the rest of the exhaust. REGARDLESS of which engine you put it on. The "shorty" units like the GMPP mani, CA and Vibrant headers all replace JUST the manifold and DO NOT require ANY modification to fit ANY of the engines!

On my 2.2 HHR I have the GMPP Manifold, a stock SS/SC DP with the cat gutted and a full exhaust system.

IF you decide to use something other than the "shorty's" and go with a "long tube" design you will NEED TO FAB A NEW DP NO MATTER THE ENGINE.

Ok, I'm done now. Hope someone read this and learned something from it!


EDIT::: The downpipe on my friend's 2.4 is the exact same as the stock one on the 2.2 HHRs!
Old 03-16-2007, 11:03 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
RuSSo-29's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-20-06
Location: Ridgefield, NJ
Posts: 8,913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice, Thankx for the info man, and on clearing that up.

Rob (Balt36), you should look to the the GMPP header. your just gunna have to save up a lil longer.
Old 03-16-2007, 11:08 AM
  #21  
Banned
 
D4u2s0t's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-18-05
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by AMG_Passion
The header will fit. All three cylinder heads use the same exhaust flange. It may be neccesary to modify the down pipe depending on which car you have.

Just because something isnt a direct bolt, does not mean it doesnt fit.

Oh, and as for the Pacesetter. I recommend avoiding them like the plague. I have never met a person that has had a good experience with a pacesetter. The Pacesetter I used on my NA Talon lasted 5 months (with a flex pipe added in, that pacesetter doesnt include) before it cracked in numerous places. Most guys driving DSM's get less the that if they dont add a flex pipe. 300ZX owners bitch about pacesetter because the ports dont line up with the ports on the head, and the longevity of the pacesetter on the Z's is about as shitty as the DSM's.

i've had zero problems with my pacesetter... looks brand new after a good ole north new jersey road salt attack... my "stainless steel" downpipe which has been on 3 times less is rusted... if i told you one of my parts was stainless and one was not, guaranteed you'd pick the pacesetter as the stainless from looks...
Old 03-16-2007, 11:11 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
RuSSo-29's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-20-06
Location: Ridgefield, NJ
Posts: 8,913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
i've had zero problems with my pacesetter... looks brand new after a good ole north new jersey road salt attack... my "stainless steel" downpipe which has been on 3 times less is rusted... if i told you one of my parts was stainless and one was not, guaranteed you'd pick the pacesetter as the stainless from looks...
Hey man, where did U go to get the DP fabbed?
Old 03-16-2007, 11:33 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Red2.4SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-02-06
Location: SK
Posts: 16,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any good custom exhaust shop should be able to fab up a DP or even a complete cat back system.
Old 03-16-2007, 11:34 AM
  #24  
I'm old school
 
Halfcent's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-16-05
Location: Nashville
Posts: 6,905
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Here is reason for the confusion:

First, ANY header will fit ANY of the the Ecotec engines in ANY Cobalt. Gaurenteed.

However, it may not fit the downpipe. That's the difference.

Pacesetter is a long tube header that requires a custom made downpipe. Not a big deal, any exhaust shop should be able to do that for you.

Shorty headers will bolt right up. Hahn and Cobalt addictions have shorties.
Old 03-16-2007, 11:44 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
RuSSo-29's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-20-06
Location: Ridgefield, NJ
Posts: 8,913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Halfcent for the info.

D4u2s0t, I know U live around Butler. Wheres the shop U got yours done at, and how much?


Quick Reply: Best headers for 2.2?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:25 AM.