best ways to put more ponies in my 2.2 without boost?
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-07-06
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by IonNinja
yeah i was reading one of their threads on the forum and they weren't sure if they were even gonna try and work with your ECM's.
they are very helpful but this is a little misleading and kinda annoys me a bit.
#28
Senior Member
Originally Posted by CivicKiller98
the communication for engine and tranny control is different on the 05+ cobalts than on the jbodies.
hptuners is going to start work on the cobalt 2.2 after they are finished with the 2.0 and 2.4
hptuners is going to start work on the cobalt 2.2 after they are finished with the 2.0 and 2.4
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-07-06
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NJHK
I know they are different, I was just saying that I wasn't sure if they had something out for any of the cobalts as well.
have a nice day
#31
Premium Member
It's not really the "communications" that represents the issue (HP Tuners works with both older Class 2 and GM Lan/CAN) it's the model of the ECM/PCM that represents the hurdle. Each model of GM box arranges and organizes the calibration files differently and each use a different "seed & key" algorithm for programming. This needs to be "cracked" before these kinds of edits can be performed.
For instance the older Jbodies use a P11 PCM, the SS/SC a P12, 2.2 Cobalts use a E16A and the 2.4 an E67. Each have their own idiosincracies but once cracked- almost any car using the same box is simultaneously as well.
For instance when the HPT final version for the LSJ is released- so will the I-engines in the Colorado/Canyons as they also use the P12.
HTH
WopOnTour
For instance the older Jbodies use a P11 PCM, the SS/SC a P12, 2.2 Cobalts use a E16A and the 2.4 an E67. Each have their own idiosincracies but once cracked- almost any car using the same box is simultaneously as well.
For instance when the HPT final version for the LSJ is released- so will the I-engines in the Colorado/Canyons as they also use the P12.
HTH
WopOnTour
Last edited by WopOnTour; 05-22-2006 at 11:14 PM.
#32
Senior Member
Originally Posted by CivicKiller98
my apologies, wasnt a crack on your knowledge of the cobalt. now you know, hp tuners might not even go further than the j's
have a nice day
have a nice day
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-07-06
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by WopOnTour
It's not really the "communications" that represents the issue (HP Tuners works with both older Class 2 and GM Lan/CAN) it's the model of the ECM/PCM that represents the hurdle. Each model of GM box arranges and organizes the calibration files differently and each use a different "seed & key" algorithm for programming. This needs to be "cracked" before these kinds of edits can be performed.
For instance the older Jbodies use a P11 PCM, the SS/SC a P12, 2.2 Cobalts use a P16A and the 2.4 an E67. Each have their own idiosincracies but once cracked- almost any car using the same box is simultaneously as well.
For instance when the HPT final version for the LSJ is released- so will the I-engines in the Colorado/Canyons as they also use the P12.
HTH
WopOnTour
For instance the older Jbodies use a P11 PCM, the SS/SC a P12, 2.2 Cobalts use a P16A and the 2.4 an E67. Each have their own idiosincracies but once cracked- almost any car using the same box is simultaneously as well.
For instance when the HPT final version for the LSJ is released- so will the I-engines in the Colorado/Canyons as they also use the P12.
HTH
WopOnTour
#34
Originally Posted by afireinside1582
i have no clue... cai? exhaust? right now im thinking of a kn drop in... for the time being
if you are preppin for boost lower your compression ratio (lower compression pistons)
if you are stayin n/a, raise your compression ratio (higher compression pistons)
#35
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-14-06
Location: sc
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah, stayin' n/a... if/when i have the funds i would like to go
injen cai
pacesetter header
gmpp touring exhaust
high flow cat
ecu retune (when available)
nkg sparkplugs and wires
injen cai
pacesetter header
gmpp touring exhaust
high flow cat
ecu retune (when available)
nkg sparkplugs and wires
#36
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Roadrunner
also,
if you are preppin for boost lower your compression ratio (lower compression pistons)
if you are stayin n/a, raise your compression ratio (higher compression pistons)
if you are preppin for boost lower your compression ratio (lower compression pistons)
if you are stayin n/a, raise your compression ratio (higher compression pistons)
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-07-06
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well monitoring the af and such is necessary but its not a setting that will need to be adjusted on a regular basis, which is why waiting for something from a tuning company would be sufficient.
#38
Banned
Join Date: 03-14-06
Location: soon to banned as I am from MANITOBA?
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by afireinside1582
oh, sorry... dont want to go the nitrous route either... anybody know anything about an ecu flash? a buddy told me they could do it at a rhinolinings... like 400 bucks and i keep the tuner... so i can get good gas mileage or more hp
#39
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 01-15-06
Location: Florence, SC
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NJHK
2 1/2" exhaust system is just too big for the 2.2 ECOTEC naturally aspirated. 2 1/4" would be much better.
#40
Senior Member
Originally Posted by CivicKiller98
well monitoring the af and such is necessary but its not a setting that will need to be adjusted on a regular basis, which is why waiting for something from a tuning company would be sufficient.
#41
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by ssnipes
LOL 400 bucks and you keep the tuner. ha ha. even if this was true which it isnt you would be far better with the extra hundred and be able to compete with SS/SC. the ultimate sleeper if you ask me. but hey its your money. NOS or NNAAAWWWZZZZ is the way to get the best bang for the buck. No super tune software is going to get you 75HP like nitrous. and a Zex kit is fool proof. you never lose a motor do to a F*&$ up with this kit.
actualy 400 dollars is about right for a programmer, and take that programmer and use it with NOS and you will get way better performance. It is not software rather a module, if they do have one out i would get one but i doubt that they realy have one, if you show me where to buy one i will!!!!
#42
Senior Member
Originally Posted by importkiller
actualy 400 dollars is about right for a programmer, and take that programmer and use it with NOS and you will get way better performance. It is not software rather a module, if they do have one out i would get one but i doubt that they realy have one, if you show me where to buy one i will!!!!
Also, not to be a dick but please don't refer to Nitrous Oxide as "NOS"...NOS is a company and the NOS stands for Nitrous Oxide Systems.
#43
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-14-06
Location: sc
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
seriously though, dont wanna put NO2 in my car... i dont race or anything... i'd describe my driving as "spirited", just looking for some cool little sleeper mods
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-07-06
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NJHK
Yeah, might not be a regular bassis but it should be something he has there for adjustment none the less.
dont get me wrong, i give a big to FMU but i dont see it as being necessary and i really gotta believe that its gonna be a waste of time and money unless there is boost involved.
#45
Senior Member
Originally Posted by CivicKiller98
im sorry, but i still dont see the logic in using a FMU over tuning, if he needs to make adjustments after tuning, he would just simply reconnect his tuner and retune, even though there isnt anything out yet.
dont get me wrong, i give a big to FMU but i dont see it as being necessary and i really gotta believe that its gonna be a waste of time and money unless there is boost involved.
dont get me wrong, i give a big to FMU but i dont see it as being necessary and i really gotta believe that its gonna be a waste of time and money unless there is boost involved.
FYI: The cams were installed when I was n/a, not boosted
#46
Senior Member
Originally Posted by afireinside1582
seriously though, dont wanna put NO2 in my car... i dont race or anything... i'd describe my driving as "spirited", just looking for some cool little sleeper mods
As far as having "sleeper" mods, anything you do under the hood is "sleeperish" untill you make it noticeable either visually or by sound.
In my opinion, the whole sleeper thing is over rated. You drive a Cobalt...no one is going to expect much unless you have an SS/SC. I'm not saying that Cobalts are slow, but the tuner/import generation isn't going to expect much from a 4 cylinder American car...I'm in the same league, no one expects my car to be quick, even with a turbo. Sad sad people
#48
Senior Member
Originally Posted by slowion2
Yeah but come on Adam, it's sure funny when you beat someone and then pop the hood to show.....nothing??? That's made my night many times.
Try showing them you're an automatic...then it's like "ZOMG!"
#50
Senior Member
Originally Posted by slowion2
LOL very true, one of our guys was running mid to low 12's with his auto and people at rallys just were in disbelief haha
I believe it