broke da BANK

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

06-17-2007, 02:26 AM

#26

elecblue06

Senior Member

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: 03-19-07

Location: newburgh,ny

Posts: 14,911

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

you sure you didn't get a 2.4

because thats the only that would've happend... along with like 90 % of your kills

Reply Like

06-17-2007, 02:37 AM

#27

nramlow2006

Banned

Thread Starter

Join Date: 10-11-06

Location: in ur moms bed

Posts: 5,929

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by elecblue06

you sure you didn't get a 2.4

because thats the only that would've happend... along with like 90 % of your kills

lol im serious non of them are bullshit made up kills... ask any of the wisconsin balt ion guys they will tell you that my car is un-usually fast for a 2.2l.... it just doesnt make sense to me lol

Last edited by nramlow2006; 06-18-2007 at 12:05 AM.

Reply Like

06-17-2007, 12:52 PM

#28

Cobalt_SSTuner

Senior Member

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: 04-30-06

Location: J-Town, Wisconsin

Posts: 14,901

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

i've seen these races w/ my own eyes...especially the turbo'd del sol

Reply Like

06-18-2007, 12:04 AM

#29

nramlow2006

Banned

Thread Starter

Join Date: 10-11-06

Location: in ur moms bed

Posts: 5,929

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cobalt_SSTuner

i've seen these races w/ my own eyes...especially the turbo'd del sol

ty lol i has hoping u would chime in eventually...

it was a v-tak /tc del slol lol at that

Reply Like

06-18-2007, 11:53 PM

#30

Cobalt_SSTuner

Senior Member

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: 04-30-06

Location: J-Town, Wisconsin

Posts: 14,901

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

dude, you have raced many cars....some knowing you didnt have a chance, and some thinking you didnt have a chance, but you ended up whooping them.

Reply Like

06-19-2007, 12:53 AM

#31

nramlow2006

Banned

Thread Starter

Join Date: 10-11-06

Location: in ur moms bed

Posts: 5,929

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cobalt_SSTuner

dude, you have raced many cars....some knowing you didnt have a chance, and some thinking you didnt have a chance, but you ended up whooping them.

yeah there has been alot of un-explainable **** that has happen lol btw i got my dash hawk... can u say " sexy time"

Reply Like

06-19-2007, 01:28 AM

#32

HunterKiller89

Senior Member

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: 07-20-06

Location: Los Angeles

Posts: 11,183

Likes: 0

Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by nramlow2006

personaly i dont think my 2.2l is an average 2.2l.. i mean i raced a 2.2 auto with full exaust nd intake nd i spanked him by a car nd a half.. raced a 2.2 manual with an intake nd i took him by car / car nd a half... somebody explain that to me all of them from a role nd a stop.;..

" god i feel like im talking like a noob" is it possible that i have some sorta " factory freak.. lol" or do u think its driver mod.. because i beat them when i was bone stock.. ive also beat alot of cars i shouldnt have

you know...there is always a +/- degree in every engine specification....such as bore=86mm+/-.03

its possible that your 2.2 happens to be made very well with numbers that are almost exactly 86mm opposed to 86.03mm If enough of these allowances are made spot on, it will make for a noticeably more powerful engine....hence why people have their engines blueprinted

Quote:

how the hell do they dyno at 140 and 2.4s dyno at 150?? if that...

2.2s are rated for 140 ... and i'm pretty sure they're not under rated

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/***************************/viewtopic.php?t=1304

i'm pretty sure they don't dyno at 140 stock considering with a full exhaust it dynoed at 135

show me a dyno that proves me and that dyno wrong please

i may be wrong (i also dont think 140 is correct, i would guess between 120-125), but i would say that the 2.4's are faster due to their VVT....a 2.2 has 155tq and a 2.4 has like 163tq. The extra .2L doesnt add a lot of power, however, the VVT could cause a much flatter torque rating on the cars...which is what makes them better. They dont have a much higher peak power, but they stay near peak power longer than a 2.2 does.

this could help explain why the 2.4 is so much faster than the 2.2 despite the little power gained