2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

Cams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2006, 10:00 PM
  #51  
Member
 
Wyoming_Bass's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-01-06
Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes its a supply demand thing kinda like why the 2.2 is so slow to get aftermarket
Old 07-01-2006, 10:46 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
IonNinja's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: AZ
Posts: 7,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i see lots of demand and no supply for a lot of things
Old 07-01-2006, 11:08 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
Clmbngfrk18's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-08-05
Location: Oxford,MA
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah i would love to see some sort of tuning avaible hp tuners is run off a laptop right that may be a little much for what i have now but its some thing and seeing something is alot better than getting nothing
Old 07-05-2006, 10:31 PM
  #54  
Member
 
Wyoming_Bass's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-01-06
Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok I actually just ordered the stage I cams. I want to run for a while with a n/a motor to get everything worked out that i want before i do my turbo set up (early next spring). When that goes in ill be getting a full on turbo cam. So the stage I cam will be best for me for now even with HP Tuning ill see some significant gains in the 2.2. If i dont like it ill have to wait to put the turbo kit in and then be completly happy!
Old 07-06-2006, 08:10 AM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
player_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-05
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you know what, when you install the cams do yourself a favour, and save yourself the labour. later and update your valve springs, your going to need to tune for the turbo later, so you might as well bump the rev limiter, so you can enjoy the boost for longer.
Old 07-06-2006, 08:39 AM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
NJHK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-05-06
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Wyoming_Bass
Ok I actually just ordered the stage I cams. I want to run for a while with a n/a motor to get everything worked out that i want before i do my turbo set up (early next spring). When that goes in ill be getting a full on turbo cam. So the stage I cam will be best for me for now even with HP Tuning ill see some significant gains in the 2.2. If i dont like it ill have to wait to put the turbo kit in and then be completly happy!
Sorry but it seems like gratuitist spending to me. I mean, you know you're going to boost and you know you want a "boost" camshaft...so why spend the money for one now? I hope you're not paying labor either...you're talking about $550-800 depending on who does the work.
Old 07-06-2006, 12:06 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
Kahless's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-05
Location: TX
Posts: 13,427
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by player_1
you know what, when you install the cams do yourself a favour, and save yourself the labour. later and update your valve springs, your going to need to tune for the turbo later, so you might as well bump the rev limiter, so you can enjoy the boost for longer.
i was thinking along these lines. why get cams that are good to 6800 if your rev limiter is at 6500??? your cutting yourself short on that one. update your springs and raise your limiter to 7500 then upgrade
Old 07-06-2006, 12:13 PM
  #58  
Senior Member
 
Kahless's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-05
Location: TX
Posts: 13,427
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by BlackLS
I was also thinking about getting a set of Set of the Stage 1 cams from TTR since I wil be staying N/A for a while. I was just hoping that someone could explain what all the specs mean so I could understand them better. I know NJHK will have something to say since he knows his stuff.

Here are the specs for the cams:

-Street (Stage 1) Applications power from 2600-6800rpm .423 intake and .419 exhaust valve lift, 252 intake and 256 exhaust duration advertized (210 intake and 212 exhaust @ .050" duration) Works best with computer modifications not required.

Thanks in advance for help.

of course 2600-6800 is the area theyre supposed to work in. the .423 and .419 are how wide the valves open in inches(net not gross), 252 and 256 is how many degrees theyre open..

and player1 edit your signature to destruction its driving me fekin nuts
Old 07-06-2006, 12:24 PM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
player_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-05
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kahless
of course 2600-6800 is the area theyre supposed to work in. the .423 and .419 are how wide the valves open in inches(net not gross), 252 and 256 is how many degrees theyre open..

and player1 edit your signature to destruction its driving me fekin nuts
done, I didn't even notice good catch
Old 07-06-2006, 12:25 PM
  #60  
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
 
victory_red_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-25-05
Location: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
Posts: 10,436
Received 271 Likes on 184 Posts
Originally Posted by Kahless
of course 2600-6800 is the area theyre supposed to work in. the .423 and .419 are how wide the valves open in inches(net not gross), 252 and 256 is how many degrees theyre open..

and player1 edit your signature to destruction its driving me fekin nuts
Short drive?
Old 07-06-2006, 02:03 PM
  #61  
Senior Member
 
IonNinja's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: AZ
Posts: 7,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so what can the 2.2 actually rev to before it needs a new valvetrain? assuming that we can actually make power over 6500.
Old 07-06-2006, 02:11 PM
  #62  
Senior Member
 
Kahless's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-05
Location: TX
Posts: 13,427
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by IonNinja
so what can the 2.2 actually rev to before it needs a new valvetrain? assuming that we can actually make power over 6500.
build book says 6500 is the limit of the stock springs. but only springs need to be changed for 7500
Old 07-06-2006, 02:43 PM
  #63  
Senior Member
 
player_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-05
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well depending on what Springs and retainers you switch too, you could tune to higher then 6500RPM, most dual coil Springs out will get you to 8000RPM pretty safely
Old 07-06-2006, 04:03 PM
  #64  
Senior Member
 
slowion2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-23-06
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kahless
build book says 6500 is the limit of the stock springs. but only springs need to be changed for 7500
you know I read that, and then heard a rumor that the 2.2 and 2.0 springs were the same, which I"m fairly sure they're not especially with that note if info.

not a bad idea to look into the bates springs and valves, I wish I had done that when I did my head swap but oh well
Old 07-06-2006, 04:36 PM
  #65  
Senior Member
 
Kahless's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-05
Location: TX
Posts: 13,427
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
i was looking at trip springs for my merc to try and get it above 9000, but thats alot of spring pressure.
Old 07-06-2006, 04:50 PM
  #66  
Member
 
Wyoming_Bass's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-01-06
Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NJHK
Sorry but it seems like gratuitist spending to me. I mean, you know you're going to boost and you know you want a "boost" camshaft...so why spend the money for one now? I hope you're not paying labor either...you're talking about $550-800 depending on who does the work.

I am not paying for the labor I am doing it myself. The reason to do the mild stage one cam is to play with a N/A car for a while. When I do go to a turbo setup ill be doing a bunch of engine work. I just want to do this for now and see where it goes!
Old 07-06-2006, 04:57 PM
  #67  
Senior Member
 
player_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-05
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by slowion2
you know I read that, and then heard a rumor that the 2.2 and 2.0 springs were the same, which I"m fairly sure they're not especially with that note if info.

not a bad idea to look into the bates springs and valves, I wish I had done that when I did my head swap but oh well
appearently the stock spring will let you safely tune to a &k limit. but not if you have cams.

thats why I upgraded to the Bates valvetrain with the dual coil spring. now i'm easily safe to 8k
Old 07-06-2006, 05:01 PM
  #68  
Senior Member
 
player_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-05
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kahless
i was looking at trip springs for my merc to try and get it above 9000, but thats alot of spring pressure.
I'm not entirely convinced it's even worth bumping it that high.

the Torque already starts to fall after 5000RPM, so if you change gears at 7-7500RPM your still up, at the top of your torque curve, so you'll still accelerate quickly.

plus if you plan on upgrading it to a 9k limit, you'd better beef up EVERYTHING internaly like Victory_Red_SS.
Old 07-06-2006, 06:10 PM
  #69  
Senior Member
 
slowion2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-23-06
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by player_1
appearently the stock spring will let you safely tune to a &k limit. but not if you have cams.

thats why I upgraded to the Bates valvetrain with the dual coil spring. now i'm easily safe to 8k
that's what I plan to eventually do when I build my spare engine up. how much did you pay for the Bates parts? did you get their retainers and tensioner too by any chance or just the dual coils?
Old 07-07-2006, 07:33 PM
  #70  
Senior Member
 
player_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-05
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Check SIG,
I got everything from JBP, they did the install as well. Duty kills me when I get stuff from the states.n

the only thing that really needs to be upgraded, are the springs, but with the aftermarket springs, you'll have to upgrade the seats and retainers.

for Bates valve train check JBP, for Ferrea valvetrain TTR had better pricing
Old 07-07-2006, 08:10 PM
  #71  
Premium Member
 
WopOnTour's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-04-05
Location: No where man
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Wyoming_Bass
My buddy (the guy who has givin me his injectors and such) has spent a massive amount of money in the past with them. They are gonna get into the 2.2 computer for him, so we can tune my car. But hey remember im the ******* with the SS badges on my car. I will however let you 2.2 guys know whats up when i get mine tuned with the cams and bigger injectors in.

He had problems with them not wanting to mess with the Alero and he just put it to them i have spent money (over 10k) with you and your not gonna support my alero? they did this was a while ago now he has his SS/SC and I have my lil 2.2 so he said the same to them and they are gonna do it like they did with his alero.
HPT is quite a ways away from getting functional with the E16 ECM used with the 2.2. There's just not enough cars to warrant it (2.2 Cobalts and IONs only) The Alero (as most other N-bodies) uses the same P11 PCM as the J-bodies and such so it was a no brainer.
Last I mentioned it to Chris at HPT - 2.2 support was "months away"
WopOnTour
Old 07-07-2006, 08:55 PM
  #72  
Member
 
Wyoming_Bass's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-01-06
Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WopOnTour
HPT is quite a ways away from getting functional with the E16 ECM used with the 2.2. There's just not enough cars to warrant it (2.2 Cobalts and IONs only) The Alero (as most other N-bodies) uses the same P11 PCM as the J-bodies and such so it was a no brainer.
Last I mentioned it to Chris at HPT - 2.2 support was "months away"
WopOnTour

ok then
Old 07-08-2006, 01:10 AM
  #73  
Senior Member
 
NJHK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-05-06
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Wyoming_Bass
I am not paying for the labor I am doing it myself. The reason to do the mild stage one cam is to play with a N/A car for a while. When I do go to a turbo setup ill be doing a bunch of engine work. I just want to do this for now and see where it goes!
I guess I understand.
Old 07-08-2006, 08:30 AM
  #74  
Senior Member
 
Kahless's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-05
Location: TX
Posts: 13,427
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by player_1
I'm not entirely convinced it's even worth bumping it that high.

the Torque already starts to fall after 5000RPM, so if you change gears at 7-7500RPM your still up, at the top of your torque curve, so you'll still accelerate quickly.

plus if you plan on upgrading it to a 9k limit, you'd better beef up EVERYTHING internaly like Victory_Red_SS.
the internal buffing will come soon enough... but the cobalt i would be happy revving to 7500. i was talking about revving my 65mercury with a ford 289 to 9000+. it can already do 8 but i want it to scream.
Old 07-08-2006, 03:53 PM
  #75  
Senior Member
 
player_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-05
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kahless
the internal buffing will come soon enough... but the cobalt i would be happy revving to 7500. i was talking about revving my 65mercury with a ford 289 to 9000+. it can already do 8 but i want it to scream.
ahh that makes a little more sense, then.

I figured 7500RPM was good limit, as well, I may change it to 8000RPM I'll see what kind of power is to be gained, once I get it tuned.
if I only gain like 5HP, I'll keep it at 7500RPM.

now I gotta figure out what the hell, I'm going to do with the stock springs and retainers lol
anyone have any ideas?


Quick Reply: Cams



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:47 PM.