Hydrogen Injection
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 08-07-07
Location: Michigan
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hydrogen Injection
So I know this doesn't actually exist but...
What if there was a hyrogen injection system (like a nitrous kit) for a car. I know (or im at least under the impression) that hydrogen blows up with alot more force than fuel does... So that sounds neat. Has it ever been done? anyone else wanna daydream lol
What if there was a hyrogen injection system (like a nitrous kit) for a car. I know (or im at least under the impression) that hydrogen blows up with alot more force than fuel does... So that sounds neat. Has it ever been done? anyone else wanna daydream lol
#5
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
its essentially what you are doing.....gas is just a bunch of carbon chains, such as C6H14...your essentially blowing up the H molecules in gasoline, which is why the C (in the form of CO and CO2) is the exhaust. burning JUST hydrogen would effectively be cleaner, but get similar horsepower figures. However, hydrogen burns so fast, i doubt its practical to build an engine that can take the power. It would probably be similar to that engine designe to be powered from knockng/detonation...great in theory, but not practical
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-18-06
Location: Jacksonville AL
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I doubt internal combustion engines are going to be around that much longer in passenger cars. They just don't work that efficiently with the fuels of the future. However they could be around for awhile for use with bio-deisel applications.
#7
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 06-13-06
Location: California
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This wouldn't provide any additional horsepower. Why? Because Nitrous works by adding additional oxygen to the combustion process so that more fuel can be used, and in turn you get more power (n2o). Each N2O molecule contains 1 oxygen molecule, providing 33% oxygen. Compare that to normal air that is only around 20% oxygen. Adding hydrogen wouldn't do the same thing, you would just be replacing the fuel with hydrogen. With the same amount of air coming in, all you would be doing is messing with your air-fuel-ratio.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 08-07-07
Location: Michigan
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well...does hydrogen blow up "Harder" than pure gas?
Kinda how nitrous is more O2 than air, hydrogen (pure) is obviously more Hydrogen than a hydrocarbon.
So. if you just put a pure constant dry shot of nitrous (No air intake), and then also injected hydrogen (Gas?) im not sure what temperature hydrogen is a liquid at..
but anyways. 2 gasses in your engine cyclinder, no liquid = better compression.
More O2 and more H2= ALOT OF ******* POWER. (mirite?)
P.S. on a side note: Why do we pay so much for filling nitrous bottles when you could just get a pure oxygen bottle? does anyone do this? has anyone heard of this?
Kinda how nitrous is more O2 than air, hydrogen (pure) is obviously more Hydrogen than a hydrocarbon.
So. if you just put a pure constant dry shot of nitrous (No air intake), and then also injected hydrogen (Gas?) im not sure what temperature hydrogen is a liquid at..
but anyways. 2 gasses in your engine cyclinder, no liquid = better compression.
More O2 and more H2= ALOT OF ******* POWER. (mirite?)
P.S. on a side note: Why do we pay so much for filling nitrous bottles when you could just get a pure oxygen bottle? does anyone do this? has anyone heard of this?
#10
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
More O2 and more H2= ALOT OF ******* POWER. (mirite?)
P.S. on a side note: Why do we pay so much for filling nitrous bottles when you could just get a pure oxygen bottle? does anyone do this? has anyone heard of this?
we use nitrous because it contains 33% oxygen, and when oxygen separates from nitrogen, it creates a cooling effect, kelping to cool the engine, resist knocking under this new energy, and keep parts from blowing up from heat (they blow by force however) nitrogen also makes up 76% of the atmosphere, and our catalytic converters are built to reduce emissions associated with nitrogen, though this is mostly just an added bonus
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 08-07-07
Location: Michigan
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wow thats something im suprised i didn't know.. gasoline is heated/compressed into a gas in the combustion chamber...hmm i feel dumb.
what about...say you got an "inline 14" 14 cylinders....meant to go 1 (maybe 2) at a time. the cam is staggered between all of the cyclinders so they don't detonate as easily.
what whould happen then?
I know this is an out there topic but whatever, its fun to theorycraft.
we use nitrous because it contains 33% oxygen, and when oxygen separates from nitrogen, it creates a cooling effect, kelping to cool the engine, resist knocking under this new energy, and keep parts from blowing up from heat (they blow by force however) nitrogen also makes up 76% of the atmosphere, and our catalytic converters are built to reduce emissions associated with nitrogen, though this is mostly just an added bonus
And another thing...
If you had pure oxygen injection, it wouldn't be 100% oxygen..it would mix with intake air and just raise the 20% to a higher number..meaning in essence that if you used it as a nitrous system, the oxygen bottle would last 3x as long since you would, in theory, need 3x less oxygen to make the same oxygen lvls that a similar amount of N20 would yeild
The only problem with the oxygen would be the heat.
what about...say you got an "inline 14" 14 cylinders....meant to go 1 (maybe 2) at a time. the cam is staggered between all of the cyclinders so they don't detonate as easily.
what whould happen then?
I know this is an out there topic but whatever, its fun to theorycraft.
we use nitrous because it contains 33% oxygen, and when oxygen separates from nitrogen, it creates a cooling effect, kelping to cool the engine, resist knocking under this new energy, and keep parts from blowing up from heat (they blow by force however) nitrogen also makes up 76% of the atmosphere, and our catalytic converters are built to reduce emissions associated with nitrogen, though this is mostly just an added bonus
If you had pure oxygen injection, it wouldn't be 100% oxygen..it would mix with intake air and just raise the 20% to a higher number..meaning in essence that if you used it as a nitrous system, the oxygen bottle would last 3x as long since you would, in theory, need 3x less oxygen to make the same oxygen lvls that a similar amount of N20 would yeild
The only problem with the oxygen would be the heat.
Last edited by Smitty1017; 09-12-2007 at 05:32 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#12
New Member
Join Date: 08-12-06
Location: Grand Blanc, MI
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ford actually has a supercharged 6.8L V10 that runs on hydrogen. I developed the damper for the engine and all I can say is that it is a dog. With 10 psi of boost it makes a whopping 250HP!! They actually converted one of the test engines to gas and made 1300HP. So yes, it can and has been done, but the output is much less than conventional gasoline. The hydrogen costs about 5 times more to refine than crude oil as well. They use it in many bus and mass transport applications b/c it has little if no emmissions. The buses are here in Detroit and in California.
#14
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
wow thats something im suprised i didn't know.. gasoline is heated/compressed into a gas in the combustion chamber...hmm i feel dumb.
what about...say you got an "inline 14" 14 cylinders....meant to go 1 (maybe 2) at a time. the cam is staggered between all of the cyclinders so they don't detonate as easily.
what whould happen then?
I know this is an out there topic but whatever, its fun to theorycraft.
what about...say you got an "inline 14" 14 cylinders....meant to go 1 (maybe 2) at a time. the cam is staggered between all of the cyclinders so they don't detonate as easily.
what whould happen then?
I know this is an out there topic but whatever, its fun to theorycraft.
a 14cyl engine only injecting enough hydrogen to not blow the cylinders (ie, same output as a i4 gasoline engine) would have such a heavy rotating mass, i dont think it would move. if your making the same power, but moving parts that are 3.5x heavier, you wont see any kind of gains, although it would indeed stand up to the detonation of hydrogen. ...also, it would be pretty damn hard to fit 14 cylinders into a car without raising the weight of the car to a level where it launches slower than a 80's civic
in the end, its just not efficient to do this...oxygen injection would be better than hydrogen fuel...unless of course its a fuel cell car
#15
New Member
Join Date: 08-01-07
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-18-06
Location: Jacksonville AL
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
that's cool and all, but I still think fuel cells are going to be the big thing. The way oil production keeps falling and oil consumption keeps rising.... We're going to start putting more and more time into things that don't use fossil fuels.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-18-06
Location: Jacksonville AL
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it'll change just like it did when fuel injection came about.... ok maybe more so... but people are still going to be trying to pull more speed out of cars, we're just going to be upping the amperage and volts instead of increasing hp and tq... and trying to decrease resistance instead of parasitic drag...
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: 12-01-06
Location: Leavittsburg, Ohio
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it'll change just like it did when fuel injection came about.... ok maybe more so... but people are still going to be trying to pull more speed out of cars, we're just going to be upping the amperage and volts instead of increasing hp and tq... and trying to decrease resistance instead of parasitic drag...
Hey, we'll find a way!!
#20
Biggest myth in the world. There is enough oil in the earth to last over 5k years even at the rate of speed we use oil now. Exactly what the big oil companies want you to think. Here in the US we have enough oil for everyone here to last 1k years+
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-18-06
Location: Jacksonville AL
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
why do you think we invaded Iraq? because it's one of the biggest untapped resources for crude oil left in the world. Drive through texas sometime and look at all the oil pumps around. How many are still pumping?
Last edited by Novajoe; 09-13-2007 at 07:30 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-17-07
Location: right behind you.
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 08-07-07
Location: Michigan
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pull those expensive componet cables off your ps3 and FEEL DA POWA
Want to hear my oil theory?
The oil in alaska were not drilling...ever wonder why?
The us isn't stupid. we're waiting till the oils gone.
Then were gonna rape the arab nations sideways like their raping us now...
Karmas a bitch huh saudi arabia?
Want to hear my oil theory?
The oil in alaska were not drilling...ever wonder why?
The us isn't stupid. we're waiting till the oils gone.
Then were gonna rape the arab nations sideways like their raping us now...
Karmas a bitch huh saudi arabia?
Last edited by Smitty1017; 09-13-2007 at 07:29 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-17-07
Location: right behind you.
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
its essentially what you are doing.....gas is just a bunch of carbon chains, such as C6H14...your essentially blowing up the H molecules in gasoline, which is why the C (in the form of CO and CO2) is the exhaust. burning JUST hydrogen would effectively be cleaner, but get similar horsepower figures. However, hydrogen burns so fast, i doubt its practical to build an engine that can take the power. It would probably be similar to that engine designe to be powered from knockng/detonation...great in theory, but not practical
gasoline is a gas in the combustion temperature....gasoline cannot burn in a liquid state.
too much power...hydrogen burns at a rate similar to an engine constantly detonating
pure oxygen is too strong...if you lit a match in a pure oxygen environment, there would be a 6in flame...opposed to a typical 3MM flame.
we use nitrous because it contains 33% oxygen, and when oxygen separates from nitrogen, it creates a cooling effect, kelping to cool the engine, resist knocking under this new energy, and keep parts from blowing up from heat (they blow by force however) nitrogen also makes up 76% of the atmosphere, and our catalytic converters are built to reduce emissions associated with nitrogen, though this is mostly just an added bonus
too much power...hydrogen burns at a rate similar to an engine constantly detonating
pure oxygen is too strong...if you lit a match in a pure oxygen environment, there would be a 6in flame...opposed to a typical 3MM flame.
we use nitrous because it contains 33% oxygen, and when oxygen separates from nitrogen, it creates a cooling effect, kelping to cool the engine, resist knocking under this new energy, and keep parts from blowing up from heat (they blow by force however) nitrogen also makes up 76% of the atmosphere, and our catalytic converters are built to reduce emissions associated with nitrogen, though this is mostly just an added bonus
Pull those expensive componet cables off your ps3 and FEEL DA POWA
Want to hear my oil theory?
The oil in alaska were not drilling...ever wonder why?
The us isn't stupid. we're waiting till the oils gone.
Then were gonna rape the arab nations sideways like their raping us now...
Karmas a bitch huh saudi arabia?
Want to hear my oil theory?
The oil in alaska were not drilling...ever wonder why?
The us isn't stupid. we're waiting till the oils gone.
Then were gonna rape the arab nations sideways like their raping us now...
Karmas a bitch huh saudi arabia?
Last edited by cakeeater; 09-13-2007 at 07:33 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#25
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 08-07-07
Location: Michigan
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I were to have an estimated guess...the usa probly wont get the vast majority on board alternative fuels for at least....30 years sounds about right...
Why?
People are gonna be hesitant to try it first of all, becuase its something unknown to them..
Secondly, all signs point to more expensive, and less resale value. people would rather pay high gas prices than an extra say 5000$ up front, imo. Why? couldn't tell ya.
I mean look at the hybrids, theres a decent amount of them out there now for sale... yet i barely evr see hyrbids around. maybe 1%. and thats a high guess.
seems like alot more people would be jumping on board by now if we are to be rid of gas/oil cars by 2025...
Why?
People are gonna be hesitant to try it first of all, becuase its something unknown to them..
Secondly, all signs point to more expensive, and less resale value. people would rather pay high gas prices than an extra say 5000$ up front, imo. Why? couldn't tell ya.
I mean look at the hybrids, theres a decent amount of them out there now for sale... yet i barely evr see hyrbids around. maybe 1%. and thats a high guess.
seems like alot more people would be jumping on board by now if we are to be rid of gas/oil cars by 2025...