JBP Performance header
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 04-18-07
Location: Apache Junction, AZ
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JBP Performance header
Has anyone put on one of these oddball vortex designed headers on their 2.2?
http://www.jbodyperformance.com/new/...catName=JP0927
They give some big claims on horsepower gains with their exhaust/ header combo, over 30hp.
I am tempted to get one of these.
But, why would someone put on a 3 inch exhaust onto a 2.2?
Is this for the 2.0 only or is the header good for the 2.2 and 2.0 but the exhaust is meant for the 2.0, or what???
http://www.jbodyperformance.com/new/...catName=JP0927
They give some big claims on horsepower gains with their exhaust/ header combo, over 30hp.
I am tempted to get one of these.
But, why would someone put on a 3 inch exhaust onto a 2.2?
Is this for the 2.0 only or is the header good for the 2.2 and 2.0 but the exhaust is meant for the 2.0, or what???
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-04-08
Location: Fredericksburg VA
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Has anyone put on one of these oddball vortex designed headers on their 2.2?
http://www.jbodyperformance.com/new/...catName=JP0927
They give some big claims on horsepower gains with their exhaust/ header combo, over 30hp.
I am tempted to get one of these.
But, why would someone put on a 3 inch exhaust onto a 2.2?
Is this for the 2.0 only or is the header good for the 2.2 and 2.0 but the exhaust is meant for the 2.0, or what???
http://www.jbodyperformance.com/new/...catName=JP0927
They give some big claims on horsepower gains with their exhaust/ header combo, over 30hp.
I am tempted to get one of these.
But, why would someone put on a 3 inch exhaust onto a 2.2?
Is this for the 2.0 only or is the header good for the 2.2 and 2.0 but the exhaust is meant for the 2.0, or what???
#3
its made for both engines, the stock ss/sc manifold is a good upgrade for the 2.2 from 2005-2006, the 2007 came with the same exhaust manifold. unless you have SAI. it would be a good upgrade for a 2.2 if you were planning on supercharging it
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-02-08
Location: Charleston, West Virginia
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I seriously considered it, but then I woke up and realized I was poor and had a 2.2. The 1 7/8" primaries are way too big for an N/A 2.2. You're going to have zero low end torque.
#9
the header makes the car sound like a boxer engine but that is because the way the flow of primaries are layed out..
its layed out wrong if you ask me but a great piece of welding there non the less
its layed out wrong if you ask me but a great piece of welding there non the less
#11
Junior Member
Join Date: 01-13-08
Location: Houma, La
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was also thinking about either getting this header and a CA downpipe or getting the vibrant 3" combo...I want to see what ppl think about the jbp b/c all i seen so far was bad stuff
#12
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
dont go 3 inch unless upushing 250+whp...2.5 is the max you should go, get urself a nice header/dp and a 2.25/2.5 exhaust, depends on what you want...i recommend a full vibrant set up, vibrant header/dp with vibrant exhaust
http://www.turbotechracing.com/produ...dcategory=5617
^^header/dp
http://www.turbotechracing.com/produ...dcategory=5617
^^exhaust
http://www.turbotechracing.com/produ...dcategory=5617
^^header/dp
http://www.turbotechracing.com/produ...dcategory=5617
^^exhaust
#21
#22
Banned
dropping the subframe
I had to cut away at some of the firewall material. aside from that it fits and theres room to spare.
I had to cut away at some of the firewall material. aside from that it fits and theres room to spare.
Last edited by Steven Flit; 12-05-2008 at 01:55 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post