2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

my car has no balls anymore

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-2009, 12:30 AM
  #76  
Senior Member
 
06_ion2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-12-06
Location: minnesota
Posts: 2,904
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by blackbolt89
hell i bet i could take a 2.4 with my oil pan pissing oil and my dp rattling against my sway bar. (both of which its doing atm)

Old 06-11-2009, 12:33 AM
  #77  
Senior Member
 
blackbolt89's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-28-08
Location: New Milford, NJ
Posts: 5,068
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 06_ion2
stock 2.4 vs me?

ha
Old 06-11-2009, 12:36 AM
  #78  
Senior Member
 
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-21-06
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by blackbolt89
stock 2.4 vs me?

ha
do you have something super special done to yours? or are you just god with your left foot?
Old 06-11-2009, 12:47 AM
  #79  
Junior Member
 
celicacavy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-07-09
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by raynrishad
I had a 2.2 LT model before I got my SS. **** breaks tires easy from a dead stop. Gutless from a roll though. I drove it eeeeasy too. Was getting over 33mpg in the city. Dare I note that I live at over 5k elevation? Car was also running a solid 17.5 second 1/4 mile. I wouldn't say they're entirly gutless.

Hows it do if you do a torque multiplier? Downshift into 1st gear, which takes off the traction control (if you have it) Hold the gas pedal down while holding the brake pedal. Should hold the RPM at like a solid 2400. Then let off the brake pedal. Should spin the tires easy, even with good tread.

I agree with the other guys about changing the fuel filter. If that doesn't work, check and see if the fuel pump is putting out sufficiant pressure. Has your gas milage changed at all? Might want to try some injector cleaner too.
I had a stock 04 cavalier 2.2 running a 15.3 quarter
Old 06-11-2009, 12:48 AM
  #80  
Senior Member
 
06_ion2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-12-06
Location: minnesota
Posts: 2,904
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by blackbolt89
stock 2.4 vs me?

ha
thats like saying i could take down ss/tc or ss/sc's











oh wait i can.
Old 06-11-2009, 12:49 AM
  #81  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Blue_Balt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-22-07
Location: Howell, NJ
Posts: 6,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by blackbolt89
hell i bet i could take a 2.4 with my oil pan pissing oil and my dp rattling against my sway bar. (both of which its doing atm)

I dunno. Maybe, maybe against a 2.4 Stock auto you might have a shot. The gearing in the 4 speed auto absolutely kills them. 2nd gear blows for you guys.
Old 06-11-2009, 01:11 AM
  #82  
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-08
Location: The 405
Posts: 37,073
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
so many angry elfs in this thread. can't we all just get along? wait...nvm, its the internet. that would be impossible. cause everyone has to always try to one-up the person that last said something. like what they say actually has any effect on anyone's life
Old 06-11-2009, 01:14 AM
  #83  
Senior Member
 
StrongIslandBalter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-05-08
Location: Long Island
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
iam just curious ex is that sig a messed up line from f&f or am i way off? and for the 2.2 thing look at nawe hes in the 14's with total n/a balt
Old 06-11-2009, 01:15 AM
  #84  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
madmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-07
Location: FT Knox KY
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
problem solved

http://www.bullsballs.com/chrome/biker/nutz.html


pick your color
Old 06-11-2009, 01:19 AM
  #85  
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-08
Location: The 405
Posts: 37,073
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
yes, i'm making fun of f&f. and yes, i'm proud of nwae, its about time the 2.2's start hitting 14s. and about this whole "sc/tc owners hating on 2.2s" ....heres my two cobalts




old pictures before my sc was modded. and i'm glad i didn't waste my time on the ls
Old 06-11-2009, 01:23 AM
  #86  
Banned
 
jsscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-08-07
Location: USA
Posts: 3,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why are people always pissing on the 2.4's? Can't we respect each others cars?
Old 06-11-2009, 01:40 AM
  #87  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-27-07
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i ca n break my tires loose on my ls...

lawl...i didnt even read the thread...i went up from my post and saw my name though...on to reading

Originally Posted by Staged07SS
so very true ....
so very WRONG
its been discussed before..you dont want backpressure..you want the perfect sized exahust that creats a vacuum while no backpressure...

Originally Posted by xxxxsh4d0wxxxx
Well, most people on here are dicks to us 2.2L's.



No, it's called - No one here wants to hear you guys rip on our cars because you drive a more superior model..

Have you ever heard the saying - If you don't have anything nice to say, keep your ******* trap shut?

Plus, a LS/TC would burn an SS/SC, one that is pretty modded, at that. I've seen it, many of times.
i have to agree 11enty billion times over...i hate that ****

ya, 2.2s and 2.4s are not that far off...and all in all the s/c's are not as far off stock as they would like to think...

i can break loose a little (not all the way, just slip them) going into third on the street if NLSing...

oh, and for the OP, try clicking your EBRAKE up ONE notch and itll turn off traction control....now you can spin your tires in an auto...

Last edited by NWAE Cobalt; 06-11-2009 at 01:40 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 06-11-2009, 02:14 AM
  #88  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Brandon97Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-13-04
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blue_Balt
Like the 2.4 is that much faster than a 2.2. I've driven a 2.4 5-speed once, and you shouldn't be talking bub.
can you not read? This has been disccused before. Its like talking to a bunch of teenage girls on their periods on here....say a few choice words and people get upset.




Originally Posted by celicacavy
I had a stock 04 cavalier 2.2 running a 15.3 quarter
And they weight about 300lbs less then a cobalt...although i do believe a stock 2.2 balt ran a 15.6. Yet doesn't get close to the 14.95 ran by a stock 2.4.
Old 06-11-2009, 03:16 AM
  #89  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-27-07
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brandon97Z
can you not read? This has been disccused before. Its like talking to a bunch of teenage girls on their periods on here....say a few choice words and people get upset.






And they weight about 300lbs less then a cobalt...although i do believe a stock 2.2 balt ran a 15.6. Yet doesn't get close to the 14.95 ran by a stock 2.4.
these times are all relative anyway...it all depends on track prep, weather, altitude.ALL variables

the only way to tell for sure is to get them together at the same time on the track, or at least on the same night and then run it...
Old 06-11-2009, 03:23 AM
  #90  
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-08
Location: The 405
Posts: 37,073
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
anyone want to come run me at the same time?
Old 06-11-2009, 03:23 AM
  #91  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
HunterKiller89's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-20-06
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
waaaay too much bickering amongst fellow cobalt owners. Just stop whining about having a slower car, and stop ragging on the 2.2 guys for having the car they do. Get back to the purpose of this thread, which is explaining why the OP cant break traction now when he used to be able to
Old 06-11-2009, 03:27 AM
  #92  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-27-07
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its an auto yes??? its called traction control...

/thread
Old 06-11-2009, 07:24 AM
  #93  
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Staged07SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-30-07
Location: NEPA
Posts: 14,331
Received 197 Likes on 175 Posts
Originally Posted by NWAE Cobalt
i ca n break my tires loose on my ls...

lawl...i didnt even read the thread...i went up from my post and saw my name though...on to reading


so very WRONG
its been discussed before..you dont want backpressure..you want the perfect sized exahust that creats a vacuum while no backpressure...

i have to agree 11enty billion times over...i hate that ****

ya, 2.2s and 2.4s are not that far off...and all in all the s/c's are not as far off stock as they would like to think...

i can break loose a little (not all the way, just slip them) going into third on the street if NLSing...

oh, and for the OP, try clicking your EBRAKE up ONE notch and itll turn off traction control....now you can spin your tires in an auto...
maybe if you read my other post i mentioned that already .... its called exhaust gas velocity. yes you want some back pressure .... dont think the bigger the exhaust the better get that outta your head right now.

i agree with you .... i believe with a larger exhaust it shifts power from the low end and sends it up top .... this makes the car seem slower. exhaust gas velcoity is key though. keeping the exhaust flowing fast yet free will net the best gains.

^ thats what I said in another post about exhaust systems .... so many people on here think getting the biggest exhaust possible is best and that zero back pressure is the best .... WRONG
Old 06-11-2009, 12:00 PM
  #94  
Senior Member
 
06_ion2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-12-06
Location: minnesota
Posts: 2,904
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921
anyone want to come run me at the same time?
i will ill bet you $300 on it?
Old 06-11-2009, 12:22 PM
  #95  
Senior Member
 
JERMzSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-01-06
Location: Van Buren, Arkansas
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im sorry my post came off as "rude" but its also the truth. 9 out of 10 people will see your muffler removed and say "there goes another dumb ricer wanting his car louder". The 1 out of that group that does not think that is prolly a buddy of yours thats done the same thing to his car.

If i saw a stock Mustang GT with his mufflers removed (even tho it sounds better) he still needs to put the mufflers back on. He isnt driving a race car. I dont care what kind of Cobalt, Cavi, import, car you drive or even how fast or slow it is....... Keep it clean and tasteful.


Agian sorry it came off as rude it was ment to be more of a FYI.
Old 06-11-2009, 12:35 PM
  #96  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Brandon97Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-13-04
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You don't want backpressure but you don't want an exhaust too big to where it will slow down exhaust velocity. Minimize backpressure while maximizing velocity is the key. A smaller exhaust (stock) will have a good velocity but too much backpressure..too large (say 3" on a 4 banger) and you have les back pressure but you slowed down the exhaust velocity cause you aren't moving enough air to take advantage of the bigger area its flowing through. In the middle you have minimized backpressure without sacraficing velocity.

Last edited by Brandon97Z; 06-11-2009 at 12:52 PM.
Old 06-11-2009, 12:50 PM
  #97  
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Staged07SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-30-07
Location: NEPA
Posts: 14,331
Received 197 Likes on 175 Posts
Originally Posted by Brandon97Z
You don't want backpressure but you don't want an exhaust too big to where it will slow down exhaust velocity. Minimize backpressure while maximizing velocity is the key. A smaller exhaust (stock) will have a good velocity but too much backpressure..too large (say 3" on a 4 banger) and you have les back pressure but you slowed down the exhaust velocity cause you aren't making moving enough air to take advantage of the bigger area its flowing through. In the middle you have minimized backpressure without sacraficing velocity.
thats what i have been saying also .... thank you for backing me up. some people always think buying the biggest exhaust so you have zero back pressure is the best .... they are so wrong.
Old 06-11-2009, 12:53 PM
  #98  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Brandon97Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-13-04
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Physics FTW
Old 06-11-2009, 12:54 PM
  #99  
Senior Member
 
1badBlueberrySC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-23-08
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LOLz... 2.2's have no ***** period. HA HA HA
Old 06-11-2009, 01:03 PM
  #100  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Brandon97Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-13-04
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1badBlueberrySC
LOLz... 2.2's have no ***** period. HA HA HA
shhh they are sensitive about that


Quick Reply: my car has no balls anymore



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:36 PM.