2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

Remote turbo????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2006, 08:30 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Kahless's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-05
Location: TX
Posts: 13,427
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
the silverado kit is only 4k. the install base for the 2.2 is much larger than the 2.0. theres alot more people with the car but will they spend the money.
Old 10-04-2006, 10:44 AM
  #27  
Member
 
BradyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-31-06
Location: Salt Lake UT
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kahless
the silverado kit is only 4k. the install base for the 2.2 is much larger than the 2.0. theres alot more people with the car but will they spend the money.
To complete the silverado kit you need tuning, probably injectors and a fuel pump too. With shipping you're looking at about $5,000. You would be stupid to buy a STS kit for your LS when you could upgrade and get a faster SS S/C cheaper.

Vette kit is twin turbos, tuning, injectors, fuel pump, and intercooler.
Old 10-04-2006, 09:50 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
8cd03gro's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-09-06
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
for cars with higher displacement engines sts is a good idea because there is really no lack of low end torque and you will see a little more lag with this setup. higher displacement engines...this is a VERY good setup if it is done right. i would only reccomend it with a car that has high clearance in the rear end ( i have a foot and 4 inches of clearance from my muffler to the ground and my sts system is going to be about 1/2" higher). they have a snorkle kit for the intake so you dont suck up water and hydrolock your engine. they are actually more efficient than you think, and alot of research and development has gone into their systems. the fastest new model gto in the world is boosted by sts and something like 7 out of the top ten are all boosted by sts.


BAM! http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...8d79b016b3.htm at 9 psi.

i really would not reccomend it for a cobalt or a small displacement engine because the lag will really hurt you there and you really don't have nearly as much flow to spool the turbo, but on higher displacement engines, if you aren't looking for huge hp gains, just a good gain for the money, i'd reccomend it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Supercharged06SS
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
21
12-11-2022 04:47 PM
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
05-28-2022 03:47 AM
hacadacalopolis
Parts
8
10-28-2015 06:09 PM
patooyee
2.4L LE5 Performance Tech
50
10-15-2015 05:11 PM
maliki778
Dyno Results
4
10-01-2015 07:39 PM



Quick Reply: Remote turbo????



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 AM.