2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

shorty or mid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2008, 02:09 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
409Cobalt07's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-29-07
Location: Beaumont, TX
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
shorty or mid

i am thinkin of puttin a new header on my 07 2.2 and was wondering what the difference would be between the shorty and the mid hp gain wise... is one better than the other? im not sure what the difference would be? any help would be appriciated. Thanks...
Old 01-08-2008, 02:11 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
sick06cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-06-07
Location: somewhere
Posts: 9,714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i have the zzp midlength with the megan racing exhaust... and i love it... its a nice low rumble at idle and then when i get on it its loud...

hoenstly i think the midlength would be the better call.. i can tell my car pulls harder now...

Last edited by sick06cobalt; 01-08-2008 at 02:11 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 01-08-2008, 06:40 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
XM15's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-16-06
Location: CT
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The shorty will give you more gains high in the power band, while the mid-length will give you gains in the mid range. Its your call where you want your power band to be. It won't be too big a difference though and either one is much better than the stock manifold.
Old 01-09-2008, 01:04 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
409Cobalt07's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-29-07
Location: Beaumont, TX
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by XM15
The shorty will give you more gains high in the power band, while the mid-length will give you gains in the mid range. Its your call where you want your power band to be. It won't be too big a difference though and either one is much better than the stock manifold.
so since i have the 2.4 mani swap on my car i should go with the mid right? and if i do that is there any mid length out for our cars that bolts up to the stock down pipe? i plan on replacing that as well but just not at the same time...
Old 01-09-2008, 06:43 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
HunterKiller89's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-20-06
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
you cant buy the ZZP midelngth header without the downpipe...its a combo piece
Old 01-09-2008, 06:47 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
D4u2s0t's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-18-05
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 409Cobalt07
so since i have the 2.4 mani swap on my car i should go with the mid right? and if i do that is there any mid length out for our cars that bolts up to the stock down pipe? i plan on replacing that as well but just not at the same time...
no, a midlength will not bolt to the donwpipe without cutting and welding.
Old 01-09-2008, 06:50 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
XM15's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-16-06
Location: CT
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 409Cobalt07
so since i have the 2.4 mani swap on my car i should go with the mid right? and if i do that is there any mid length out for our cars that bolts up to the stock down pipe? i plan on replacing that as well but just not at the same time...
Thats still up to you. If you want to get the most peak hp out of your car and maximize the 2.4 manifold at the high rpm's, go with the shorty. If you want to balance the power a little bit more between mid and high, go with the midlength.

As far as I know, only shorties can bolt right up to the stock downpipe.
Old 01-09-2008, 06:57 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
an0malous's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-06
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,577
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i thought it was the other way around, that a mid would help more with the high end.


though i admit im not really familiar with the differences caused by mid vs shorty.
anyone know any good places to read about that?
Old 01-12-2008, 01:33 PM
  #9  
New Member
 
hubes's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-16-06
Location: NS, Canada
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...ics/index.html
thats jsut one, theres lots around, jsut search header theory or something in google, I ve also found equations for deciding what size primaries to use based on your displacement and at what rpm you want peak torque
Old 01-14-2008, 02:37 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
409Cobalt07's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-29-07
Location: Beaumont, TX
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i really dont do anything more than run a 1/4 mile on the weekends so i think a shorty would do just fine. it shouldnt mess with any of the daily driving that i do right? i dont really drive all that fast anymore. too many tickets
Old 01-14-2008, 05:12 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
XM15's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-16-06
Location: CT
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 409Cobalt07
i really dont do anything more than run a 1/4 mile on the weekends so i think a shorty would do just fine. it shouldnt mess with any of the daily driving that i do right? i dont really drive all that fast anymore. too many tickets
A shorty header will serve your purpose just fine, and drivability will only improve.
Old 01-16-2008, 08:07 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
409Cobalt07's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-29-07
Location: Beaumont, TX
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok. well when i get my income tax check back i will purchase one and install it then im off to the track!
Old 01-16-2008, 08:09 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
articzap's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-28-06
Location: Depew, NY
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4-1 short will be the best at flowing air at high RPM's and a 4-2-1 long tube will provide the most low end torque but not flow as well in the upper RPM's. Take your pick.
Old 01-17-2008, 05:15 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
HunterKiller89's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-20-06
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by articzap
4-1 short will be the best at flowing air at high RPM's and a 4-2-1 long tube will provide the most low end torque but not flow as well in the upper RPM's. Take your pick.
i dont understand this. i would think the only difference would be that in a long tube, there is a lot more surface area on the headers helping the exhaust cool and condense, which would free up space allowing more to flow easier at all RPMs. of course this would in tern reduce scavenging abilities, lowering you low end power, while raising high end power due to your now greater flow.

im open to learn, cause i have no clue if the above is correct, but its the only thing that makes sense in my mind
Old 01-17-2008, 08:27 AM
  #15  
Banned
 
articzap's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-28-06
Location: Depew, NY
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't have my notes from Wyotech here at work as to the reasons, I just know thats how it is. I'll post something later.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RaginChopsuey
War Stories
16
10-27-2015 01:27 PM
Jesse
Parts
15
10-13-2015 09:32 PM
goaliemo
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
6
09-28-2015 01:37 PM
GBRunner24
Featured Car Showcase
3
09-26-2015 06:44 PM
hacadacalopolis
Parts
1
09-08-2015 11:42 PM



Quick Reply: shorty or mid



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 AM.