2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

turbo decisions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-2012 | 02:53 PM
  #1  
Jkpowell's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 03-25-09
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Question turbo decisions

Hey, Im looking into turboing my car. i have been looking a zzps stage 3 turbo kit. what would i have to upgrade on my stock 2.2l engine before i install this kit. also i have hp tuners and will be doing the tuning myself.
Old 08-26-2012 | 03:31 PM
  #2  
08baltls's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-01-11
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 1
From: Joshua, TX
Internals for sure. The stage 3 adds 150+ hp so your stock internals are likely to fail very quickly after the install. You're also going to need to step up to a better clutch if your a manual because stock clutch won't hold that much power either.
Old 08-26-2012 | 06:12 PM
  #3  
Jkpowell's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 03-25-09
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
i was told stock clutch would hold up to 400 hp. and what internals would have to be upgraded? pistons, rods? it comes with injectors this is my first build. and im going to do the internal build up before i buy the kit and just tune it as the parts go on.
Old 08-26-2012 | 06:45 PM
  #4  
nhanson's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-07-08
Posts: 6,428
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota
Piston and rods for sure. Valve springs if you want to rev it out.

Stock clutch on a 2.2 will not hold 400...the trans most likely will.
Old 08-26-2012 | 07:33 PM
  #5  
08baltls's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-01-11
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 1
From: Joshua, TX
You'll need to replace pistons and rods for forged ones. Depending on the mileage and how reliable you want, I would also replace rod and main bearings. The stock head is good to 400hp as is, but again depending on mileage you may want to upgrade. If you're wanting to rev higher then about 7300 rpms you're also gonna need neutral balance shafts. You can rev up to about 7500 without them but I wouldn't recommend doing that a lot without balance shafts and head work.

The stock tranny should be fine up to about 400hp, but as an L61 we don't have many options in that category.
Old 08-26-2012 | 09:01 PM
  #6  
Jkpowell's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 03-25-09
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
so should i keep the compression at stock? also im planning on just a 2.5" catback cause i heard a 3" wont make a difference.
Old 08-26-2012 | 09:09 PM
  #7  
08baltls's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-01-11
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 1
From: Joshua, TX
Pushing that much boost, I would drop the compression. Especially if you're tuning your first build. No offense cause I'm not sure of your tuning abilities but with higher compression if you screw up at all you could cause severe detonation problems and potentially damage the head as well. Keeping a high compression ratio is a good way to make power, but for minimal gains I don't see it being worth it in the long run.

As for the catback, running a turbo with over 300hp is probably just fine on a 2.5" catback system given you have a flow through muffler and aren't talking about stock. But if you decide to go up any higher you're probably going to run into issues with exhaust velocities. Too restrictive and you won't have enough velocity to evacuate the head of the exhaust gases efficiently. However, going too large you could also run into those problems as well. Most people who go turbo though end up running a 3", for what it's worth.
Old 08-26-2012 | 10:23 PM
  #8  
IonNinja's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-29-05
Posts: 7,926
Likes: 0
From: AZ
the only thing I would get in addition to that kit is a catback

you can get a clutch and pistons/rods as time goes on
Old 08-26-2012 | 10:31 PM
  #9  
08baltls's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-01-11
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 1
From: Joshua, TX
Originally Posted by IonNinja
you can get a clutch and pistons/rods as time goes on
Do this only if you want to risk buying new rods and pistons as well as a new block when you snap a rod and throw it through the side of the block. It's easier and cheaper to just swap rods to begin with.

There's a guy who I used to know who took that stance of go big on the power and worry about reliability later turbo'd his car 4 months later blew the pistons out. So please don't be dumb like that.
Old 08-26-2012 | 10:48 PM
  #10  
nhanson's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-07-08
Posts: 6,428
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by 08baltls
Do this only if you want to risk buying new rods and pistons as well as a new block when you snap a rod and throw it through the side of the block. It's easier and cheaper to just swap rods to begin with.

There's a guy who I used to know who took that stance of go big on the power and worry about reliability later turbo'd his car 4 months later blew the pistons out. So please don't be dumb like that.
He can easily get the kit, run lower boost, and be reliable.
Old 08-27-2012 | 12:31 AM
  #11  
08baltls's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-01-11
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 1
From: Joshua, TX
If you run 8-10psi on a stage 3 kit with 50/60# injectors you'll have trouble tuning it. Unless he's extensivly tuned boosted cars he's gonna have a tough time adjusting fuel maps and MAF frequencies to run properly. And if he's only going to run 8/10 psi then why buy a stage 3 kit?

My suggestions were based off the implication that he wants big horsepower, which would be why he's going straight to a stage 3 kit. Yeah, you can bolt a turbo on that's capable of hitting 300/400hp and turn the boost controller all the way down, but it doesn't seem like that's what he's wanting to do.

My only concern is seeing another half ass build end in catastrophic failure due to pushing the components beyond their rated limits, especially to the extreme of bolt on another 150hp.
Old 08-27-2012 | 12:33 AM
  #12  
nhanson's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-07-08
Posts: 6,428
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota
I bet im pushing my components past their limits!!!
Old 08-27-2012 | 12:59 AM
  #13  
08baltls's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-01-11
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 1
From: Joshua, TX
You're on a 2.9 right?
Old 08-27-2012 | 01:27 PM
  #14  
IonNinja's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-29-05
Posts: 7,926
Likes: 0
From: AZ
You don't know what you're talking about, sorry lol
Old 08-27-2012 | 02:20 PM
  #15  
08baltls's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-01-11
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 1
From: Joshua, TX
Haha. Obviously I do more then you. 258 hp is the rated limit for stock 2.2 internals. Can they handle a little more then that for a while? Sure. Can you throw 150 added hp at them and expect them to last. Hell the **** no.

Jesus. The level of incompetence on this site scares the living **** out of me most days.
Old 08-27-2012 | 03:22 PM
  #16  
07cobaltguy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-01-07
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 2
From: Jackson, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by 08baltls
Haha. Obviously I do more then you. 258 hp is the rated limit for stock 2.2 internals. Can they handle a little more then that for a while? Sure. Can you throw 150 added hp at them and expect them to last. Hell the **** no.

Jesus. The level of incompetence on this site scares the living **** out of me most days.
I am on 15psi on E85, I trapped near 115mph. Car is holding together just fine. I guess i am incompetent. Master oh master please forgive me....

258? really?
Old 08-27-2012 | 03:27 PM
  #17  
07cobaltguy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-01-07
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 2
From: Jackson, Wisconsin
I can pretty much tear apart everyone of your posts so far in this thread. You are spewing garbage to this guy. Quit while you are ahead.
Old 08-27-2012 | 03:37 PM
  #18  
08baltls's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-01-11
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 1
From: Joshua, TX
Yeah 258. GM Racing tested the L61 ecotec motor to 258 before failure of the rods. Don't believe me? Go look it up. I'll wait.

And while you're at it, I would love to see how you tear everyone of my posts apart. So please try your best. Everything I have posted is information made public by people who sole job was to push every portion of our motors to their breaking points. I'm sorry if me taking the time to read the data published and pass it along offends you, but that doesn't make it false. If some of you people would read too you would find the same information I'm passing along. Just because you and your buddies did one thing doesn't mean it's going to work for everyone. And just because you feel comfortable sitting on a ticking time bomb doesn't mean everyone else is.

Point is, if op wants to drop $3000 for a turbo kit he might as well do it right and error on the side of caution instead of taking the ricer mentality of "screw it lets make big numbers for a short time and worry about other problems when **** blows up".
Old 08-27-2012 | 03:49 PM
  #19  
07cobaltguy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-01-07
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 2
From: Jackson, Wisconsin
Yeah, GM tested it. With NITROUS. Read that? NITROUS. Little different than boost there don't you think? Its a severe shock to the rods and pistons rather than the gradual ramp of boost. Mkulry ran garretts turbo kit for 4+ years at 250+WHP. WHP not BHP. I ran 10psi for 3 years, had fueling issues and lost the motor on 15psi after running for 5 months on 15psi. 1LowLS was on a 2.8 pulley forever. Ion_Ninja has been on boost forever. I could keep going.

Your claim that he wont be able to tune 60's at 10psi is just ridiculous. There is no reason he cant. None.

He CAN have reliable low boost end of story. You can scare him all you want but its the facts. If he has the coin to throw around and build and boost all at once cool. To everyone else that cant and wants boost don't scare them off with "GM's Numbers".
Old 08-27-2012 | 04:03 PM
  #20  
08baltls's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-01-11
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 1
From: Joshua, TX
Yeah and nitrous also has cooling effects to somewhat (and I use that loosely) to prevent detonation. Sure, nitrous is instantaneous but you get the same effects from boost when you beat on it and keep the motor in full boost for extended periods of time, ie racing. And on a first forced induction build do you really think he's gonna granny drive te car when it's done?

1lowls recently just had to build his motor did he not?...

I never said it was impossible to tune at 10psi on 60s, only that it was difficult. Op said this was his first build, and if he's never tuned for 60s he's gonna have issues tuning it to run properly. That's what I said. Again, reading comprehension is your friend.

Now if op wants to take y'alls advice and throw caution to the wind with his car based on stupid opinions, then when he blows his motor are y'all gonna hand over the money to fix it?...

Yes the motor can handle 250, but not much over.
Old 08-27-2012 | 05:34 PM
  #21  
BankerBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-10-10
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 0
From: Eagan, MN
Name:  IMAG0583.jpg
Views: 16
Size:  63.1 KB
This is what happened to mine running 210 whp stock




Name:  IMAG0587.jpg
Views: 16
Size:  66.7 KB
Old 08-27-2012 | 07:16 PM
  #22  
MadBrad's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-29-07
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Bottom line, if he wants the power around 300 HP the engine components would eventually fail due to fatigue.
Old 08-27-2012 | 07:25 PM
  #23  
MadBrad's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-29-07
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Originally Posted by 08baltls
(1) Yeah and nitrous also has cooling effects to somewhat (and I use that loosely) to prevent detonation. Sure, nitrous is instantaneous but you get the same effects from boost when you beat on it and keep the motor in full boost for extended periods of time, ie racing. And on a first forced induction build do you really think he's gonna granny drive te car when it's done?

(2) 1lowls recently just had to build his motor did he not?...


(3) Yes the motor can handle 250, but not much over.
(1) Stress is Stress no matter how it is applied.
(2) Think he needs a new head now.
(3) Heck somebody could blow the engine at 200 hp.

Last edited by MadBrad; 08-27-2012 at 07:26 PM. Reason: SP error
Old 08-28-2012 | 01:56 AM
  #24  
nhanson's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-07-08
Posts: 6,428
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by 08baltls
You're on a 2.9 right?
2.8 now with 14ish PSI.

He is right about testing with nitrous. Boost is easier on the engine.

I will be on E85 SOON!
Old 08-28-2012 | 08:57 AM
  #25  
08baltls's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-01-11
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 1
From: Joshua, TX
Yeah but what a lot of people are seeming to forget is that a turbo will make more horsepower at the same psi level over a supercharger since we deal with about 10% parasitic loss driving a supercharger of the crank.

I just dont want to see someone lose a motor right after boosting it.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49 AM.