2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

why is my 2.2 so slow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-2007, 02:21 PM
  #226  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
lsjwannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-23-06
Location: on here
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah something about exploding
Old 08-21-2007, 02:22 PM
  #227  
Senior Member
 
fbaero10's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-26-07
Location: Morgantown, Pa
Posts: 14,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 409Cobalt07
i was acctually thinking of nitrous.. but i m not sure about it yet. Any downsides about doing something like that?
lol besides blwoing your engine into pieces lol. nooooo

but if you do it right your stock engine can handle a 50 dry shot. and im just gonna run that. through all gears computerized on off switch.. my friend hit 14.3 with his set up. in a 2.4
Old 08-21-2007, 02:24 PM
  #228  
Senior Member
 
409Cobalt07's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-29-07
Location: Beaumont, TX
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well obviously that is a BIG problem. i was just seeing if it is worth the money compared to something like F/I. not saying that it is any safer, maybe not as likely to put my one and only car out of commision for too long...
Old 08-21-2007, 02:24 PM
  #229  
Senior Member
 
JKennedy1612's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-03-07
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your problem is it's a 2.2
Old 08-21-2007, 02:24 PM
  #230  
Senior Member
 
fbaero10's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-26-07
Location: Morgantown, Pa
Posts: 14,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a 50 shot is like 350 bucks. lol a turbo is like 4 grand plus install.. umm yea.. lol
Old 08-21-2007, 02:25 PM
  #231  
Senior Member
 
OrngBalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-10-07
Location: West Babylon, NY
Posts: 5,893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 409Cobalt07
i was acctually thinking of nitrous.. but i m not sure about it yet. Any downsides about doing something like that?
if done wrong... yes. just do it right and don't just jump into it. build your car without it, and then if you want more than look into it. if you do decide to go this route the 2.4 manifold will help for sure since it is one solid molded piece instead of 2 glued together like the 2.2 intake manifold
Old 08-21-2007, 02:26 PM
  #232  
Senior Member
 
409Cobalt07's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-29-07
Location: Beaumont, TX
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
really? that cheap? i thought the kits kits were more than that... or at least all the ones i looked at lol
Old 08-21-2007, 02:26 PM
  #233  
Senior Member
 
fbaero10's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-26-07
Location: Morgantown, Pa
Posts: 14,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JKennedy1612
Your problem is it's a 2.2
oh god. just shut up dude and read the thread. its not that its a 2.2 he ran 17s in a 2.2 compared to other 2.2s at the track and completely stock running 16.5s ... you about 4 pages off.
Old 08-21-2007, 02:27 PM
  #234  
Senior Member
 
409Cobalt07's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-29-07
Location: Beaumont, TX
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats why i origanally purchased it. for spray i mean
Old 08-21-2007, 02:27 PM
  #235  
Senior Member
 
fbaero10's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-26-07
Location: Morgantown, Pa
Posts: 14,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 409Cobalt07
really? that cheap? i thought the kits kits were more than that... or at least all the ones i looked at lol
yea let me get you the link man. there is a 2.2 on this site running a dual stage shot. and hes running REAL fast times

http://www.dynotunenitrous.com/store...?idproduct=100

Last edited by fbaero10; 08-21-2007 at 02:27 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 08-21-2007, 02:27 PM
  #236  
Senior Member
 
iLLmaTic3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-05
Location: NY
Posts: 4,932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dude y is ur car so slow..before i had my 2.4 i had a 2.2 that some one drove into me and totalled it..but i ran a 16.2 stock and i was auto...not sure what to tell u
Old 08-21-2007, 02:29 PM
  #237  
Senior Member
 
OrngBalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-10-07
Location: West Babylon, NY
Posts: 5,893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 409Cobalt07
well obviously that is a BIG problem. i was just seeing if it is worth the money compared to something like F/I. not saying that it is any safer, maybe not as likely to put my one and only car out of commision for too long...
on a 2.2 it will probably be safer than F/I for the simple fact that you will not be using the nitrous ALL the time like you would a sc or turbo. build yourself right and you should be fine. I mean there is ALWAYS risk, but you can minimize that risk.
Old 08-21-2007, 02:30 PM
  #238  
Senior Member
 
409Cobalt07's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-29-07
Location: Beaumont, TX
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by iLLmaTic3s
dude y is ur car so slow..before i had my 2.4 i had a 2.2 that some one drove into me and totalled it..but i ran a 16.2 stock and i was auto...not sure what to tell u
thank you for making me feel that much worse over the numbers i put up lol and i really dont know what to say excuse wise. it was my first time ever running anything on a 1/4 mile track.... does that help? lol
Old 08-21-2007, 02:30 PM
  #239  
Senior Member
 
fbaero10's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-26-07
Location: Morgantown, Pa
Posts: 14,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://www.cobaltss.net/gallery/bro...=3&userid=8795

check out this guys 2.2
Old 08-21-2007, 02:31 PM
  #240  
Senior Member
 
409Cobalt07's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-29-07
Location: Beaumont, TX
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks for the link. this will definatly help me decided on something for the future of my car...
Old 08-21-2007, 02:35 PM
  #241  
Senior Member
 
OrngBalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-10-07
Location: West Babylon, NY
Posts: 5,893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 409Cobalt07
well obviously that is a BIG problem. i was just seeing if it is worth the money compared to something like F/I. not saying that it is any safer, maybe not as likely to put my one and only car out of commision for too long...
on a 2.2 it will probably be safer than F/I for the simple fact that you will not be using the nitrous ALL the time like you would a sc or turbo. build yourself right and you should be fine. I mean there is ALWAYS risk, but you can minimize that risk.
Old 08-21-2007, 02:35 PM
  #242  
Senior Member
 
iLLmaTic3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-05
Location: NY
Posts: 4,932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im not putting anyone down..i was stock and it was my first time running on a track..im just puttin it out...there
Old 08-21-2007, 02:37 PM
  #243  
Senior Member
 
OrngBalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-10-07
Location: West Babylon, NY
Posts: 5,893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 409Cobalt07
thank you for making me feel that much worse over the numbers i put up lol and i really dont know what to say excuse wise. it was my first time ever running anything on a 1/4 mile track.... does that help? lol
hey dont worry about it. it was your first time and like we stated 100 times in this thread... not all cars are created the same. they can roll off the same line on the same day and one for some reason has 5 or 10 extra hp and one has 5 less than it should... it just happens.

don't feel bad. and dont worry about the time you run, just try and improve your time... thats the real fun.
Old 08-21-2007, 02:37 PM
  #244  
Senior Member
 
fbaero10's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-26-07
Location: Morgantown, Pa
Posts: 14,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes but then again elevation and temp has alot to do with it. like i said to the one guy who ran the 16.5 on a cool like 55 degree night, boom hes gonna run 16.2s
Old 08-21-2007, 02:38 PM
  #245  
Senior Member
 
iLLmaTic3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-05
Location: NY
Posts: 4,932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the track is different...it sucks that there is really no tuning for the 2.2 yet..on the piggy back smt...2.2 guys need the tuning for sc and tc
Old 08-21-2007, 02:38 PM
  #246  
Senior Member
 
OrngBalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-10-07
Location: West Babylon, NY
Posts: 5,893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by fbaero10
xxcobalt05xx he has probaly one of the nicest 2.2's on the site. definitely has the best built engine.
Old 08-21-2007, 02:46 PM
  #247  
Senior Member
 
fbaero10's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-26-07
Location: Morgantown, Pa
Posts: 14,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yea for sure. that kids car is real nice.
Old 08-21-2007, 02:48 PM
  #248  
Senior Member
 
cobalt9123's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-22-07
Location: Winder, GA
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you should look at my bumper to gmpp intake thread, it made me faster, not sure about the 1/4 mile though, lol
Old 08-21-2007, 08:45 PM
  #249  
Member
Thread Starter
 
kloppster's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-31-07
Location: denver, pa
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
found something weird out today with my car... i was racing and when it hit 110 the tourqe converter locked in and i couldnt go any faster buty i thought LT's stop ayt 125?
Old 08-21-2007, 08:56 PM
  #250  
Senior Member
 
tonio5555's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-05
Location: USA
Posts: 2,477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kloppster
found something weird out today with my car... i was racing and when it hit 110 the tourqe converter locked in and i couldnt go any faster buty i thought LT's stop ayt 125?
On the stock 16 inch rims with Pirelli's you should top out around 120mph. Since you have swapped rims your speed governor is the same but you speedo may be off.


Quick Reply: why is my 2.2 so slow



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:32 PM.