2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

XTC Redesigned Header

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-2007, 06:41 PM
  #1  
Pacific Cobalt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
XTC Redesigned Header

Just got an email from Kenny at Cobalt Addiction.
The new redesigned header will be out in 3 weeks it's going to fit the 2.2 perfectly.
I should be getting around 165 WHP after this header and my XTC Downpipe goes on.
Wait for my DYNO results in about a month.
Old 09-20-2007, 06:44 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
XM15's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-16-06
Location: CT
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think 165whp is a little optimistic. I would expect closer to 150whp if I were you.

By the way, what kind of header is it? Shorty, midlength, longtube?
Old 09-20-2007, 06:44 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
g5mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-17-06
Location: Moncton Newbrunswick Can.
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Iam assuming its good for all models?
Old 09-20-2007, 06:45 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
JRelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-27-06
Location: Jacksonville,Florida
Posts: 6,381
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by XM15
I think 165whp is a little optimistic. I would expect closer to 150whp if I were you.

By the way, what kind of header is it? Shorty, midlength, longtube?
yes i agree your numbers are very optimistic
Old 09-20-2007, 06:48 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
shawn672's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-07-07
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wait...I thought XTC was working on a header for the 2.2 w/ SAI?
Old 09-20-2007, 07:58 PM
  #6  
Banned
iTrader: (39)
 
mkulrey13's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-30-05
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 18,569
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
ive been told 3 weeks for the past year. ive given up with them for the most part...
Old 09-20-2007, 10:00 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
shawn672's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-07-07
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mkulrey13
ive been told 3 weeks for the past year. ive given up with them for the most part...
every week they keep telling you just 3 more weeks? LOL
Old 09-20-2007, 10:24 PM
  #8  
Pacific Cobalt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by JRelly
yes i agree your numbers are very optimistic
Didn't Crate engine depot dyno 151.69 WHP with only GMPP SRI, GMPP Catback and 2.4 intake manifold Kit.
I have all that so adding an XTC Header/XTX 2.5 Downpipe shoud give me 5-10 more HP
Old 09-20-2007, 10:34 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
shawn672's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-07-07
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pacific Cobalt
Didn't Crate engine depot dyno 151.69 WHP with only GMPP SRI, GMPP Catback and 2.4 intake manifold Kit.
I have all that so adding an XTC Header/XTX 2.5 Downpipe shoud give me 5-10 more HP
no, you hit a wall at 152whp, thats what everyone else has reported, dunno if i believe it. they said the ECU or PCM basically throttle the gas

some guy dyno'd 152, but on a SS/SC header that was ported, a dp, and something else, and got nearly the same dyno sheet

edit: again like i said, im not too sure if i believe it, b/c how come when people use n2o, they're getting the exact number that their size shot should add.

IE. IF you obtained 80whp from a 75shot on a similar 4cyl, then ppl with cobalts are dynoing with that extra 80whp, but how come the computer isnt throttling and limiting the gas then??
Old 09-20-2007, 10:49 PM
  #10  
Pacific Cobalt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

Originally Posted by shawn672
Wait...I thought XTC was working on a header for the 2.2 w/ SAI?
You might be right I didnt specify if it's for SAI cobalts
Anyone tried the SCDYNE or ZZP header I need advice cause I have only seen bad reviews so far mostly about fitment issues, rusting, warping.
Old 09-20-2007, 11:02 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
shawn672's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-07-07
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pacific Cobalt
You might be right I didnt specify if it's for SAI cobalts
Anyone tried the SCDYNE or ZZP header I need advice cause I have only seen bad reviews so far mostly about fitment issues, rusting, warping.
i've heard the ZZP header is supposed to be good stuff

emailing XTC right now to get more info
Old 09-20-2007, 11:07 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
wdsoccer's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-06
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 10,510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ive been waiting for a year in october, the companyt thats making it for Cobalt addiction keeps telling them 2 more weeks. he said i will be the first to know that its out since ive been waiting for about a year
Old 09-21-2007, 01:25 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
IonNinja's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: AZ
Posts: 7,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shawn672
IE. IF you obtained 80whp from a 75shot on a similar 4cyl, then ppl with cobalts are dynoing with that extra 80whp, but how come the computer isnt throttling and limiting the gas then??
it doesn't have a choice, it doesn't control the nitrous or fuel...the jets do. the only thing it can do at that point is pull timing which you should do anyway under that type of shot.
Old 09-21-2007, 10:34 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
shawn672's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-07-07
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IonNinja
it doesn't have a choice, it doesn't control the nitrous or fuel...the jets do. the only thing it can do at that point is pull timing which you should do anyway under that type of shot.
ya but why would the computer cut back on fuel if its making 152+whp, but not do the same thing with n2o or a super/turbo charger?
You would think if this is true, the whole 152 wall, then if you strapped a turbocharger to it, it would try to fight the effects and lower your total hp...
Old 09-21-2007, 12:54 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
IonNinja's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: AZ
Posts: 7,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the ECU doesn't control fuel on a wet nitrous kit

also the limiting factor is the motor itself...at this time it can only move so much air that opening up everything possible wont benefit you any if you can only move x amount of air at a given RPM.

to overcome this you need a cam with more lift and duration to allow for more air.

with a turbo/supercharger you are cramming in compressed air so it can take advantage of the larger exhaust and intake. Also at that point your stock injectors can't even support F/I because you are moving more air then you can provide fuel for so you can't cut back on already maxed out injectors.
Old 09-21-2007, 03:22 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
shawn672's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-07-07
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IonNinja
the ECU doesn't control fuel on a wet nitrous kit

also the limiting factor is the motor itself...at this time it can only move so much air that opening up everything possible wont benefit you any if you can only move x amount of air at a given RPM.

to overcome this you need a cam with more lift and duration to allow for more air.

with a turbo/supercharger you are cramming in compressed air so it can take advantage of the larger exhaust and intake. Also at that point your stock injectors can't even support F/I because you are moving more air then you can provide fuel for so you can't cut back on already maxed out injectors.
do you do think that the 2.2 has a "152 wall"?
Old 09-21-2007, 03:44 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Brandon97Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-13-04
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its not a "152" wall since thats just merely a number spit out by a dyno, could be 135 on another or 165 on a another. Its more of a cfm wall. The motor can only pull in so much air, like stated above cams will help by allowing the motor to bring in more air. Tuning is playing a big part too as your allowing the engine to breath better but no fuel is being added.
Old 09-21-2007, 04:41 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
IonNinja's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: AZ
Posts: 7,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i'm sure you could get more power out of the motor alone just from increasing the timing a little bit.

but it pretty much comes down to needing a way to tune no matter which route you're looking to go...
Old 09-21-2007, 05:12 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Novajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-18-06
Location: Jacksonville AL
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IonNinja
i'm sure you could get more power out of the motor alone just from increasing the timing a little bit.

but it pretty much comes down to needing a way to tune no matter which route you're looking to go...
we need more than just a way to tune. We need a way to raise the stock rev limiter.

Without a higher rev limit to take advantage of more aggressive cams the only ways to pull more power out of the motor is to raise the compression and add supporting mods that put more power to the ground
Old 09-21-2007, 05:47 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Brandon97Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-13-04
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With mose tuning devices they allow you to raise the limiter. But it will all depend on the cam grind.
Old 09-21-2007, 06:06 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Novajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-18-06
Location: Jacksonville AL
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brandon97Z
With mose tuning devices they allow you to raise the limiter. But it will all depend on the cam grind.
not with our piggybacks. You need to eliminate the factory fuel cut. And that's just not possible with a piggyback system.
Old 09-21-2007, 06:27 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
YellowLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-24-05
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I only Made 138 with all my stuff.
Old 09-21-2007, 06:50 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Novajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-18-06
Location: Jacksonville AL
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by YellowLT
I only Made 138 with all my stuff.
no 2 cars are alike... also all you really have for engine performance is I/H/E
Old 09-21-2007, 10:04 PM
  #24  
Pacific Cobalt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Brandon97Z
Its not a "152" wall since thats just merely a number spit out by a dyno, could be 135 on another or 165 on a another. Its more of a cfm wall. The motor can only pull in so much air, like stated above cams will help by allowing the motor to bring in more air. Tuning is playing a big part too as your allowing the engine to breath better but no fuel is being added.
Good Point I agree that there is only so much air you can get into the engine. If only there was a tune for the 2.2 I would add a comp. Cam and the Stock SS fuel Injectors.
Come On SCT We need your HELP
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
goaliemo
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
6
09-28-2015 01:37 PM
z28addiction
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
0
09-28-2015 12:03 AM
GBRunner24
Featured Car Showcase
3
09-26-2015 06:44 PM
budah93
General Cobalt
48
09-15-2015 07:23 AM
hacadacalopolis
Parts
1
09-08-2015 11:42 PM



Quick Reply: XTC Redesigned Header



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 AM.