2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

15.5 with an auto.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2008 | 11:30 AM
  #101  
iLLmaTic3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-02-05
Posts: 4,932
Likes: 0
From: NY
my best time stock was 15.7 this was 35* at nite in good ol englishtown, nj...track prep sucked too..lol
Old 05-13-2008 | 11:31 AM
  #102  
Dunkinuts's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-28-07
Posts: 3,713
Likes: 0
From: Tall Timbers, MD
Originally Posted by RedBaseBolt
My last attempt at the strip was 15.9 at 89 mph.

That was before the 2.4 intake and header and dp though.

I dunno where I'm at now but I will say that on a dry day if I leave it in first (auto) and stop on it when I'm around 4500rpm I am at the limit of traction for my tires, they will start to break loose.
sorry but you wouldn't take me at least but was the 2.4 you were racing an auto? then sure it would be a good race. or the guy can't really drive all that well, or you drive that well and can get every bit of speed out of it. but either way cobalts FTW and just for the record i am not call you BSer or what not.
Old 05-13-2008 | 11:51 AM
  #103  
RedBaseBolt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-28-05
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 1
From: Oshawa, ONT
Originally Posted by Dunkinuts
sorry but you wouldn't take me at least but was the 2.4 you were racing an auto? then sure it would be a good race. or the guy can't really drive all that well, or you drive that well and can get every bit of speed out of it. but either way cobalts FTW and just for the record i am not call you BSer or what not.
Yep he was auto and had a Rebel Auto Works CAI installed. Other than that he was stock.

It was a good race.

I bet I would be in mid 15 second range with my latest mods. With traction of course, because thats now becomming a concern with my crappy 205's
Old 05-13-2008 | 12:05 PM
  #104  
Dunkinuts's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-28-07
Posts: 3,713
Likes: 0
From: Tall Timbers, MD
yeah i wouldn't doubt you being able to high mid 15s yeah grab some new tires and start getting on my bumper
Old 05-13-2008 | 11:35 PM
  #105  
iLLmaTic3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-02-05
Posts: 4,932
Likes: 0
From: NY
new tires will def help..those pirelli's blow
Old 05-15-2008 | 09:02 AM
  #106  
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-06
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 3
From: Gainesville, FL
Originally Posted by iLLmaTic3s
new tires will def help..those pirelli's blow
i always thought they were an okay tire. def better than most stock rubber on cars of the cobalts class.

that said, when mine wore out, i purchased Sumitomo HTR Z tires from tirerack. so far, for $55 a pop, they outgrip the stock pirellis by a wide margin and don't break loose nearly as easily.
Old 05-22-2008 | 11:51 AM
  #107  
SScoupé's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 08-10-07
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Canada
alright! Injen CAI and B&M shiftplus on the way
Old 05-25-2008 | 12:03 PM
  #108  
455rocket's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-19-06
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
From: Imlay City, Michigan
Maybe not by todays standards and compared to the SS/SC but these 2.4s are pretty quick. In the mid to high 15s we are faster than my old 88 Monte Carlo SS with a 305, and that was considered somewhat quick at the time at 15.9 in the quarter, and faster than my 89 Z24 with a 2.8 V6 which i thought was fast as hell at the time compared to what else was on the road back then.

My feeling is, is it a hot rod like an SS/SC? no but the 2.4 is pretty neat in its own right, for what it is.

Last edited by 455rocket; 05-25-2008 at 12:03 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 05-25-2008 | 05:16 PM
  #109  
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-06
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 3
From: Gainesville, FL
Originally Posted by 455rocket
Maybe not by todays standards and compared to the SS/SC but these 2.4s are pretty quick. In the mid to high 15s we are faster than my old 88 Monte Carlo SS with a 305, and that was considered somewhat quick at the time at 15.9 in the quarter, and faster than my 89 Z24 with a 2.8 V6 which i thought was fast as hell at the time compared to what else was on the road back then.

My feeling is, is it a hot rod like an SS/SC? no but the 2.4 is pretty neat in its own right, for what it is.
oh yeah, a mid 15 is better than 90% of the muscle cars ever made
Old 05-25-2008 | 06:55 PM
  #110  
455rocket's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-19-06
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
From: Imlay City, Michigan
Yeah isn't that funny its amazing what they can do with a little four banger now. Could use a little more torque but with the gas going up im very happy with this car, its a pretty good compromise in every way. Its quick, handles great, good brakes, decent ride, good mpg, looks good, decent factory stereo, best car I've ever had at any price.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigdeertz
Parts
47
11-17-2016 09:41 AM
Shane H
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
7
09-20-2015 11:56 AM
2.2ecotec
General Cobalt
1
08-25-2015 07:56 PM
roccityroller
Drag Racing
22
10-26-2011 12:05 PM



Quick Reply: 15.5 with an auto.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:15 AM.