2.4 exhaust numbers?
#1
2.4 exhaust numbers?
does anyone have any before and after u installed your exhaust what type of gains u had? also what numbers u gained after u tuned with that exhaust? also please specify auto or manual please
#5
#6
The tune helped out a lot. The car shifts faster and the pe delay is now gone. My gas mileage improved somewhat. If you keep your foot on the pedal it will burn FAST but for regular driving I avg over 30mpg in the city.
#7
Im only doing the jet stage 2 module here in a couple weeks though.
#8
how much does that cost and whatr numbers do u see from that?
Last edited by xander40; 09-27-2009 at 06:27 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#9
#10
ya i heard it was super hard to get into that range. what does a stock ss/sc put down to the wheels?
does no one seriously have any numbers?
does no one seriously have any numbers?
Last edited by xander40; 09-27-2009 at 08:59 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#11
Skip the catback and get a Header and Downpipe. 2 of the most popular brands are ZZP and Vibrant. Expect around a 10-15whp gain with just a Header and Downpipe. It will cost you between $400 and $650 for them. Do some research...
#12
how do you figure?
I saw 213 this weekend for a stock SS/SC, super humid day though
I saw 213 this weekend for a stock SS/SC, super humid day though
#14
So you're telling me you anticipate 20-30 horsepower from good weather and a tune? (171 to 190-200hp) Come on.... that's just ridiculous.
Stock dyno for a 5-speed 2.4l is low 150's. It's been dyno'd over and over for baselines. You're telling me it's possible to gain 33% of the car's stock horsepower just from some exhaust/intake mods and a tune? That's fantasy world.
There has not been a single instance of a fully bolted 2.4l putting down anything outside of the low 180's. And I can think of very few that have made that at best. It'll take cams to get anywhere near 200whp.
Stock dyno for a 5-speed 2.4l is low 150's. It's been dyno'd over and over for baselines. You're telling me it's possible to gain 33% of the car's stock horsepower just from some exhaust/intake mods and a tune? That's fantasy world.
There has not been a single instance of a fully bolted 2.4l putting down anything outside of the low 180's. And I can think of very few that have made that at best. It'll take cams to get anywhere near 200whp.
#15
So you're telling me you anticipate 20-30 horsepower from good weather and a tune? (171 to 190-200hp) Come on.... that's just ridiculous.
Stock dyno for a 5-speed 2.4l is low 150's. It's been dyno'd over and over for baselines. You're telling me it's possible to gain 33% of the car's stock horsepower just from some exhaust/intake mods and a tune? That's fantasy world.
There has not been a single instance of a fully bolted 2.4l putting down anything outside of the low 180's. And I can think of very few that have made that at best. It'll take cams to get anywhere near 200whp.
Stock dyno for a 5-speed 2.4l is low 150's. It's been dyno'd over and over for baselines. You're telling me it's possible to gain 33% of the car's stock horsepower just from some exhaust/intake mods and a tune? That's fantasy world.
There has not been a single instance of a fully bolted 2.4l putting down anything outside of the low 180's. And I can think of very few that have made that at best. It'll take cams to get anywhere near 200whp.
#16
Sigh.
#17
yeah i cant see 171whp with just intake.. seems fishy.. i dynoed baseline 145 with intake and weld on magnaflow muffler and weld in high flow cat.. after that i tuned then ended up with 159whp... seems like 180-90 would take a fair bit of work to even get that..
#18
though you seem on the lowend of the scale honestly.
#19
I wittnessed his dyno. Plus, I ran 147whp right after him on bad plugs/poor gas.
Last edited by Mindrot; 10-04-2009 at 03:51 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#20
I believe his 171 with just an intake. He dyno'd 173 I think with full exhaust and intake in high humidity in north carolina during a NASTY humid raint day. I'm quite sure that will affect his numbers
I wittnessed his dyno. Plus, I ran 147whp right after him on bad plugs/poor gas.
I wittnessed his dyno. Plus, I ran 147whp right after him on bad plugs/poor gas.
#21
You guys compare your numbers using Dynojets and dynos on rolls I bet...
Dynapack is precise and COULD be compared from one car to the other, assuming similar atmospheric conditions
Dynojet should only be used for tuning
On a Dynojet, you can change your numbers just by playing with the straps.... so that's not accurate to me
200 WHP on our cars would mean that you're at roughly 241 HP crank..... ridiculous!
That would be a jump from 171 HP to 241 HP
A fully bolted naturally aspirated 2.4 can go just over 180 WHP (a few have done it), and that's really good (180 whp is about 215 HP.... 171 to 215 is almost hard to believe)
I totally agree with you
Dynapack is precise and COULD be compared from one car to the other, assuming similar atmospheric conditions
Dynojet should only be used for tuning
On a Dynojet, you can change your numbers just by playing with the straps.... so that's not accurate to me
200 WHP on our cars would mean that you're at roughly 241 HP crank..... ridiculous!
That would be a jump from 171 HP to 241 HP
A fully bolted naturally aspirated 2.4 can go just over 180 WHP (a few have done it), and that's really good (180 whp is about 215 HP.... 171 to 215 is almost hard to believe)
I totally agree with you
Last edited by pat_07ss; 10-06-2009 at 02:15 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#22
I have a modified GMPP intake (modded similar to a K&N without the filter and heatshield) and getting a CA V2 header and XTC 2.5 highflow catted DP. Stock catback & muffler though (prefer as I don't want to deal with the cops for loud exhaust already got enough tickets with my old car with exhaust) How much HP might I put down? Also would getting mandrel bent catback pipes hooked up to the stock muffler make any real difference? Or should I just leave the stock catback and get a custom 2.5 over the axel pipe instead?
#23
You guys compare your numbers using Dynojets and dynos on rolls I bet...
Dynapack is precise and COULD be compared from one car to the other, assuming similar atmospheric conditions
Dynojet should only be used for tuning
On a Dynojet, you can change your numbers just by playing with the straps.... so that's not accurate to me
200 WHP on our cars would mean that you're at roughly 241 HP crank..... ridiculous!
That would be a jump from 171 HP to 241 HP
A fully bolted naturally aspirated 2.4 can go just over 180 WHP (a few have done it), and that's really good (180 whp is about 215 HP.... 171 to 215 is almost hard to believe)
I totally agree with you
Dynapack is precise and COULD be compared from one car to the other, assuming similar atmospheric conditions
Dynojet should only be used for tuning
On a Dynojet, you can change your numbers just by playing with the straps.... so that's not accurate to me
200 WHP on our cars would mean that you're at roughly 241 HP crank..... ridiculous!
That would be a jump from 171 HP to 241 HP
A fully bolted naturally aspirated 2.4 can go just over 180 WHP (a few have done it), and that's really good (180 whp is about 215 HP.... 171 to 215 is almost hard to believe)
I totally agree with you
you also factoring 20% drivetrain loss which is incorrect figuring he's a 5 spd car. So factor around 10-15%. So according to your numbers this would be closer to acceptable number for you.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post