2.4 SS 0-60 times
#52
well after looking at this vid. my 2.4 blows that thing out of the water. and isnt that a 2.2 cuz of the different gauges. i mean i had a 2.2 and i did like 0-60 in like 7.5 seconds..if i remember. and my 2.4 i cudnt tell u wut that is..but with a intake and a tune i ran 2.3 on my 60' so yeah..hmmm 2.2 or 2.4 is the real question? haha
#53
#56
Because the other numbers for the SS of 0-60 mph@7.1 sec and the ź-mile of 15.7 sec @91 seem right on the mark.
That would make the SS at least 1 sec. slower in 0-60 and 1/4 mile ET than my SC, and at least 6-7 mph slower in the 1/4 mile.
Which seems exactly right.
#57
Well, I wouldn't go as far to say that a single misreported entry would invalidate an entire test.
Because the other numbers for the SS of 0-60 mph@7.1 sec and the ź-mile of 15.7 sec @91 seem right on the mark.
That would make the SS at least 1 sec. slower in 0-60 and 1/4 mile ET than my SC, and at least 6-7 mph slower in the 1/4 mile.
Which seems exactly right.
Because the other numbers for the SS of 0-60 mph@7.1 sec and the ź-mile of 15.7 sec @91 seem right on the mark.
That would make the SS at least 1 sec. slower in 0-60 and 1/4 mile ET than my SC, and at least 6-7 mph slower in the 1/4 mile.
Which seems exactly right.
14.87@95.6mph (w/only 500 miles on the odo)
15.7-14.87 DOES NOT EQUAL ATLEAST 1 second lol
95.6mph-91mph DOES NOT EQUAL ATLEAST 6-7 mph slower than your cobalt lol. So if your talking about other peoples numbers. DO NOT state MY SC The whole thing is that you said atleast. when it wasnt even the amount quoted. haha and don't put down other peoples car. It makes your self look arogant even when we have the same car just a different trim.
Have you heard about the 2.4 hahn kit. 13.7 with an auto tranny....
#58
lol come on, you need to go back to school.. simple math.
14.87@95.6mph (w/only 500 miles on the odo)
15.7-14.87 DOES NOT EQUAL ATLEAST 1 second lol
95.6mph-91mph DOES NOT EQUAL ATLEAST 6-7 mph slower than your cobalt lol. So if your talking about other peoples numbers. DO NOT state MY SC The whole thing is that you said atleast. when it wasnt even the amount quoted. haha and don't put down other peoples car. It makes your self look arogant even when we have the same car just a different trim.
Have you heard about the 2.4 hahn kit. 13.7 with an auto tranny....
14.87@95.6mph (w/only 500 miles on the odo)
15.7-14.87 DOES NOT EQUAL ATLEAST 1 second lol
95.6mph-91mph DOES NOT EQUAL ATLEAST 6-7 mph slower than your cobalt lol. So if your talking about other peoples numbers. DO NOT state MY SC The whole thing is that you said atleast. when it wasnt even the amount quoted. haha and don't put down other peoples car. It makes your self look arogant even when we have the same car just a different trim.
Have you heard about the 2.4 hahn kit. 13.7 with an auto tranny....
And apparently, Reading Comprehension can not be counted as among your stronger skills.
Because I CLEARLY stated in my sig that the 14.87@95.6mph that I ran was done when I only had 500 miles on the car (I wasn't even making the full 12 1/2 lbs/ of boost yet ... around 10-11lbs.).
Sorry if I made myself look arrogant, as that was not my intention. And I'm sure the rest of us here will also forgive you as well, for acting like a total meat head.
So I don't know about the other peeps here ... but at least I will forgive you!
#59
roger that
its my birthday, and ill complain if i want too, complain if i want to.. you would too if it was your b-day tooo!!
hahaha
its my birthday, and ill complain if i want too, complain if i want to.. you would too if it was your b-day tooo!!
hahaha
Last edited by fbaero10; 07-07-2007 at 02:13 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#60
Well, I wouldn't go as far to say that a single misreported entry would invalidate an entire test.
Because the other numbers for the SS of 0-60 mph@7.1 sec and the ź-mile of 15.7 sec @91 seem right on the mark.
That would make the SS at least 1 sec. slower in 0-60 and 1/4 mile ET than my SC, and at least 6-7 mph slower in the 1/4 mile.
Which seems exactly right.
Because the other numbers for the SS of 0-60 mph@7.1 sec and the ź-mile of 15.7 sec @91 seem right on the mark.
That would make the SS at least 1 sec. slower in 0-60 and 1/4 mile ET than my SC, and at least 6-7 mph slower in the 1/4 mile.
Which seems exactly right.
#61
#63
#64
Interesting.. Mine redlines at 50mph in second, like engine cuts out. maybe the cambodian...errr Canadian cars are geared differently?????
who knows.. although now its getting a little better, still working on another video
who knows.. although now its getting a little better, still working on another video
#68
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post