2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

2.4 SS 0-60 times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2007 | 10:51 PM
  #51  
fbaero10's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-26-07
Posts: 14,117
Likes: 0
From: Morgantown, Pa
yea its cool. well im waiting til i get my hahn turbo. no point in getting a header and all that stupid stuff when i can be running 13s with just one more part/kit lol.
Old 07-03-2007 | 11:15 PM
  #52  
iLLmaTic3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-02-05
Posts: 4,932
Likes: 0
From: NY
well after looking at this vid. my 2.4 blows that thing out of the water. and isnt that a 2.2 cuz of the different gauges. i mean i had a 2.2 and i did like 0-60 in like 7.5 seconds..if i remember. and my 2.4 i cudnt tell u wut that is..but with a intake and a tune i ran 2.3 on my 60' so yeah..hmmm 2.2 or 2.4 is the real question? haha
Old 07-04-2007 | 10:03 AM
  #53  
dm919's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-29-06
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: NC
Here is my Ion 2.4L-I am usually mid 7's 0-60

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...51874511781411
Old 07-05-2007 | 12:59 PM
  #54  
silver2.4's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-14-07
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: MI
That top speed of 118mph is a typo I believe. Did anyone notice they qouted a 0-120mph time?
Old 07-06-2007 | 02:11 AM
  #55  
Schultzay's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-25-07
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
yea i saw that haha it kinda destroys the validity of their report, but o well
Old 07-07-2007 | 08:40 AM
  #56  
firemanfrank's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-07
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by Schultzay
yea i saw that haha it kinda destroys the validity of their report, but o well
Well, I wouldn't go as far to say that a single misreported entry would invalidate an entire test.

Because the other numbers for the SS of 0-60 mph@7.1 sec and the ź-mile of 15.7 sec @91 seem right on the mark.

That would make the SS at least 1 sec. slower in 0-60 and 1/4 mile ET than my SC, and at least 6-7 mph slower in the 1/4 mile.

Which seems exactly right.
Old 07-07-2007 | 12:42 PM
  #57  
fbaero10's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-26-07
Posts: 14,117
Likes: 0
From: Morgantown, Pa
Originally Posted by firemanfrank
Well, I wouldn't go as far to say that a single misreported entry would invalidate an entire test.

Because the other numbers for the SS of 0-60 mph@7.1 sec and the ź-mile of 15.7 sec @91 seem right on the mark.

That would make the SS at least 1 sec. slower in 0-60 and 1/4 mile ET than my SC, and at least 6-7 mph slower in the 1/4 mile.

Which seems exactly right.
lol come on, you need to go back to school.. simple math.

14.87@95.6mph (w/only 500 miles on the odo)
15.7-14.87 DOES NOT EQUAL ATLEAST 1 second lol
95.6mph-91mph DOES NOT EQUAL ATLEAST 6-7 mph slower than your cobalt lol. So if your talking about other peoples numbers. DO NOT state MY SC The whole thing is that you said atleast. when it wasnt even the amount quoted. haha and don't put down other peoples car. It makes your self look arogant even when we have the same car just a different trim.

Have you heard about the 2.4 hahn kit. 13.7 with an auto tranny....
Old 07-07-2007 | 01:44 PM
  #58  
firemanfrank's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-07
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by fbaero10
lol come on, you need to go back to school.. simple math.

14.87@95.6mph (w/only 500 miles on the odo)
15.7-14.87 DOES NOT EQUAL ATLEAST 1 second lol
95.6mph-91mph DOES NOT EQUAL ATLEAST 6-7 mph slower than your cobalt lol. So if your talking about other peoples numbers. DO NOT state MY SC The whole thing is that you said atleast. when it wasnt even the amount quoted. haha and don't put down other peoples car. It makes your self look arogant even when we have the same car just a different trim.

Have you heard about the 2.4 hahn kit. 13.7 with an auto tranny....
Wow, you need to chill out and relax a bit man. Too much coffee this morning?

And apparently, Reading Comprehension can not be counted as among your stronger skills.

Because I CLEARLY stated in my sig that the 14.87@95.6mph that I ran was done when I only had 500 miles on the car (I wasn't even making the full 12 1/2 lbs/ of boost yet ... around 10-11lbs.).

Sorry if I made myself look arrogant, as that was not my intention. And I'm sure the rest of us here will also forgive you as well, for acting like a total meat head.

So I don't know about the other peeps here ... but at least I will forgive you!
Old 07-07-2007 | 02:13 PM
  #59  
fbaero10's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-26-07
Posts: 14,117
Likes: 0
From: Morgantown, Pa
roger that

its my birthday, and ill complain if i want too, complain if i want to.. you would too if it was your b-day tooo!!

hahaha

Last edited by fbaero10; 07-07-2007 at 02:13 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 07-07-2007 | 02:57 PM
  #60  
Schultzay's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-25-07
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Originally Posted by firemanfrank
Well, I wouldn't go as far to say that a single misreported entry would invalidate an entire test.

Because the other numbers for the SS of 0-60 mph@7.1 sec and the ź-mile of 15.7 sec @91 seem right on the mark.

That would make the SS at least 1 sec. slower in 0-60 and 1/4 mile ET than my SC, and at least 6-7 mph slower in the 1/4 mile.

Which seems exactly right.
I'm just saying if they supposedly got their 0-120 time and say the car only goes to 118 then doesn't it make you wonder about the other stuff too?
Old 07-07-2007 | 03:00 PM
  #61  
fbaero10's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-26-07
Posts: 14,117
Likes: 0
From: Morgantown, Pa
Originally Posted by Schultzay
I'm just saying if they supposedly got their 0-120 time and say the car only goes to 118 then doesn't it make you wonder about the other stuff too?
if it is manual it prolly can hit the 120. or down hill
Old 07-07-2007 | 04:07 PM
  #62  
BlackedOutCoby's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 12-29-06
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: D/FW-(Grapevine area)
Not to mention in the original posters video he didnt hit 60mph/100kph until mid 3rd gear and my LS hits 60mph at teh top of second gear right before the shift to third.
Old 07-07-2007 | 04:20 PM
  #63  
fbaero10's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-26-07
Posts: 14,117
Likes: 0
From: Morgantown, Pa
Originally Posted by BlackedOutCoby
Not to mention in the original posters video he didnt hit 60mph/100kph until mid 3rd gear and my LS hits 60mph at teh top of second gear right before the shift to third.
my ss hits i think 65 in 2nd gear. like max. usually shift at like 58-60 mph
Old 07-08-2007 | 04:29 PM
  #64  
Flash~SS2.4's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 10-07-06
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Kelowna, BC
Interesting.. Mine redlines at 50mph in second, like engine cuts out. maybe the cambodian...errr Canadian cars are geared differently?????

who knows.. although now its getting a little better, still working on another video
Old 07-08-2007 | 05:18 PM
  #65  
stlurbanpunk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-25-04
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 0
From: STL
yeah, i can reach 60 (mph) in 2nd.
Old 07-09-2007 | 12:02 AM
  #66  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,911
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
30-35 in first 60-65 in second and i've never done a full pull through third straight through... but when going from second . third third tops at about 90-92 or so
Old 07-09-2007 | 11:26 AM
  #67  
Flash~SS2.4's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 10-07-06
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Kelowna, BC
n/m tried last night. 2nd goes to around 65.

Car seems to be pulling alot harder recently.
Old 07-09-2007 | 11:47 AM
  #68  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,911
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
Originally Posted by Flash~SS2.4
n/m tried last night. 2nd goes to around 65.

Car seems to be pulling alot harder recently.
hehe ok cuz I was about to start cracking on canadia ;-)
Old 07-09-2007 | 02:36 PM
  #69  
Flash~SS2.4's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 10-07-06
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Kelowna, BC
no no no.. not yet.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
06MetallicBalt
Mid East
9
08-17-2021 03:40 PM
Fearedbynone
South Central
1
04-14-2016 03:25 AM
biniecki
Problems/Service/Maintenance
8
10-25-2015 02:23 PM
SSLOW06
Complete Cars
1
10-01-2015 07:21 PM
dieGone
Complete Cars
0
10-01-2015 06:27 PM



Quick Reply: 2.4 SS 0-60 times



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 AM.